Jump to content

PhonoBrainer

Members
  • Posts

    2,545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by PhonoBrainer

  1. Sweet Smooth Slow Bossa Strat Nova. Where's my sangria? Love the changes in this. Very clear lead guitar tone. Don't know if you could feature another solo lead instrument other than that guitar all the way through, tasty though it is. Nice one! cheers, -Tom
  2. PhonoBrainer

    ...

    David, thanks, I know you have discerning tastes, glad you liked it! Dan, many thanks. Hopefully, after a little more cleaning up, the end of this jingle is near.
  3. Mix clarity is great, very sparkly but that bass fills the down low just great. I hear Imogen Heap. So that's sort of like Paul McCartney You have a good voice and the ear candy is way good. Nice mix of the modern with the acoustic guitars. Got any English lyrics? My Urdu is sadly non-existent. cheers, -Tom
  4. PhonoBrainer

    ...

    James, yes please I could use help with editing out the 1940's hiss on those exposed vocal samples. I have dropped the high eq as low as I could, without killing the vocal.I don't have any "noise reduction" or such fixing plug-ins, denoisers, whatever they are. Maybe that's the next step for this. Thanks for the comments! I'll check out PSB . . . Daryl, thanks and good call on hi-hats. Generally I edit the drums last, and the early push-out was, guess what, minimal drum attention. Time to take a whack at it. And I can't carry T. Dolby's Suitcase, because I'm an Airhead. Love that guy. Thank you, I love you, goodbye. Steve SPAK, thanks so much! The "skills" are mostly high pass filtering everything to above 200 - 300hz, and even the bass gets hpf to above 50-60 hz. Pan crap around a little. Then post it and get good suggestions and hope you randomly wrote a good tune for once. DKirby, thanks for that. There's still some mud down in the mix and the drums need some love, but so far so far. I can't get in to those posh bars or clubs, I don't have the threads. But thanks for the compliment!
  5. PhonoBrainer

    Flurry68

    What was the 59th version like? Hey, just trying out some of these discount emoji. Plural of emoji, emojii? Your tune is cool and swirly. What's on the master bus? For me some elements are getting smooshed into a two-dimensional plane. Is there a "glue" compressor or something? I dunno. Is there a master bus eq that's removing the highs with an eq? I listened on headphones, and definitely appreciated the panning. Glad to know there are others with 60 versions. Is there less fancy master bus processing on version #15? might be worth a revisit, just to check. Anyway, very nice flow of a tune here. For fun, the next Soundcloud song of yours was "The Promise You Made" - great tune, and mix depth aplenty. A good reference I think for "Flurry68" . . . cheers, -Tom
  6. Inventive and cool in the lyrics department. Love that "U2" style guitar break, but your vocal compilations give it a full originality. Listening on headphones, I wanted a bit more width in the mix, especially in the first couple of minutes. Later on, the panning seems to fill out a bit wider. Perhaps that's my imagination? Just love the originality of this. Authentic songwriting methinks. cheers, -Tom
  7. Johannes Sebastian Cottrell! Enjoyable from the get-go, nothing wrong with the composition or arrangement. You are getting some good advice on string upgrades. Welcome to spending money! There are some forum folk here who really do the symphonic stuff at a very high level, hopefully they can offer you some good advice. One idea - it's a chamber music piece, but I don't hear the chamber. Feed all of those tracks into one chamber reverb preset, don't go crazy with long decay times, and high-pass filter the reverb so that the reverb plug-in isn't returning anything below 500 - 600 hz. Worth a shot. cheers, -Tom
  8. Duuuude! You are famous! That's way cool you sent that in. I used to subscribe to "Recording" and always liked the reviews of people's work. Judging by the studio picture up on the "Recording" website, you have invested some $$$ on room treatment, and I can really hear a clarity in your vocal track that didn't necessarily used to be there. I liked the organ filling quite a bit. The bass guitar is pretty dry, which I think generally is a good call, but here I might want just a bit of delay, room, or chorus. Or not, could go either way. The mix pretty much sparkles. I liked that buzzy panning synth, maybe louder on that when it's featured? cheers, -Tom
  9. Oh my. Can't believe you pulled this off of cassette. Those guitars are played and mixed great. Vocal performance is way cool, I'd push it up in the mix, and for the love of god, push those cheeseball 80's synths down a little. You are frightening the millenials. Perhaps my strong reaction is because I was a keyboard player in an 80's band and I know all those satanically insipid waveforms all too well. The ending has a restart beat? Might check that. Yep, authentic warmth for days, mixed well. Very nice job saving this one! cheers, -Tom
  10. I'm a fan. The second half of the intro, maybe add a organ/B3 noodle to make a longer intro more relevant? I like the guitar tones for their guts and realness. The mix works for me, but it's not cohesive in the reverb dept, as in "Is everyone in the same space?" - that would be not really. It's studio treatment, where the singer has slapback, the drums have a bit of natural stairwell, the guitars are up front. I'm OK with that if it's a good song and vocal performance. Which, this is. Your vocals are good, the vocal arrangement is sweet spot all the way, and the toe tapping factor is 9.9 out of 10. Ending? some beat got skipped? And the last three seconds are the noise floor being compressed up? You might look at that. Is this an album that's already baked and in the can? cheers, -Tom
  11. I'm not watching this: . . . or am I?
  12. Then, most likely, you're also not in Oklahoma, Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, or Southern Minnesota. Too bad, its often very nice there!
  13. PhonoBrainer

    ...

    Thanks, John, appreciate the compliment. You are correct, this one was more an exercise in getting to know some new tools. As far as electronica goes, I love it but boy it usually doesn't have enough breaks or sections - for me, they usually hang on one riff waaaay too long. To each them owns. cheers, -Tom
  14. PhonoBrainer

    ...

    Thanks, Noynekker! The voiceover guy is from an old 1940's movie where a professor holds forth. I hope all of his pompous condescension comes through the mix. I re-did the upload because the electric piano didn't make it into the render. many thanks! Expensive car sounds great. Actually, they are all kind of expensive these days. cheers, -Tom
  15. 50? Welcome to the club! I can recommend several knee surgeons. For me, the chorus, the vocals are a little buried. Do you add a guitar layer in the chorus? it's the "don't wait around until you're old" section. The guitar work is really good and fits the song in the right spots. I listened on headphones. Possibly the bass could have a notch cut out in the upper mids? So the lower part of the vocal can poke its head out more? I dunno. Personal preference - on a groove jam like this, a fade-out ending is more satisfying that just . . . stopping. My .02 Zimbabwe Dollars. Very good, driving tune. Age appropriate to the max. cheers, -Tom
  16. It's interesting. You don't often hear that combination of voices. The first 16 bars or whathaveyou are just the synth triplets? You might get us to the goods sooner. You've got the build-up covered in four bars. So what is going on while this music is playing? Video game maybe? That might be cool. Or is it the intro to a movie? I'm feeling kind of stupid, because I wanted to turn it up but the "Bandcamp" player? didn't have a volume control on it that I could see. Did you mix it softly? Is it big, loud, and epic on your end? Yeah I know I could have just turned up my system, but was curious as to how loud you mixed it originally. cheers, -Tom
  17. To prove I listened, and read the lyrics sheet, second verse, "could" is sung "can" . . . Great song, a nice lilt all the way through. It's well mixed because I can hear the words clearly while the supporting instruments fill, dip, dive, enter, exit. Nicely conceived. It's a great listen. Between the couplet at the end, you can hear someone shifting in their chair, or rattling a paper, or? Actually, the whole thing has a pretty "recorded live" feel. So that might be okay! "...story impossibly true" / rattle creak / "A story impossibly true." I dunno, what do you make of it? Probably no big deal? It does add to the feel of the "room" which might be worth it. I've liked your other songs I've heard, you guys have a great presentation of harmonies and stripped-down arrangements. Lots of dynamics. Excellent! cheers, -Tom
  18. Well I bet Van Halen could play reggae if they wanted to. I don't think they do, though. Plus they no longer exist as a band. So there's that. Cool tune.
  19. I don't want to go off topic, but nice song, I dig the lyrics and the guitar arpegg riff. Maybe the kick drum is too big and crunchy in spots. Daryl's voice is killer. cheers, -Tom
  20. First thing I did was turn it up Nice and loud! I don't usually do that. It was a great listen all the way through. Super musical, great ideas that lead somewhere. Nice changes of mood and voices. Lamb Lies Downesque. The bit around 1:30 got kind of bottom-heavy in the mix, that rhythm guitar is overpowering anything sparkly up top. For me, anyway. Drums hit all the spots very tastefully. Guitar solos and backing, just great! Oh, fantastic arrangement. The ending was super cool. This is one of your best I reckon . . . cheers, -Tom
  21. I like it, had a Corrs vibe in spots, which I like. Some don't. But the lead synth gets out of hand (louder) in spots. 2:22, the violin. I found it worked a little better when you had slightly more openness in the mix. There's just a couple of "kitchen sink" spots that left me wondering. Perhaps I'm too old. That said, the complexity generally is quite admirable, and dare I say cohesive! Well done this! -Tom
  22. Love it. Should be fun. Works best for me when it was more minimal, as opposed to the built-up sections. Still a toe tapper. cheers, -Tom
  23. Yeah my first thought was "vocals please!" For your budget equipment, its really good. Mix is nice and clear on all the instruments. Nothing really masks anything else. As for choice of instruments, I liked everything except for that dipping and diving brassy lead synth patch. You know the one. That I didn't dig at all. What is Van Halen's "Jump" patch doing in this cool reggae song? To paraphrase The Dude . . . but, that's like, just my opinion, man. I think you have a good one here. cheers, -Tom
  24. Mark Knopfler in style, what a great compliment that is! How about a combo of Paul Simon and Randy Newman on the vocals? But that's overcomparing. I liked the video and the choices you made there. Pretty mellow all the way through. The mix was bright but didn't think too much so. Don't need drum n bass for this one. Most everything about it is understated, which works. Your guitar fill work in the vocal gaps fits well. nice job! -Tom
×
×
  • Create New...