pwal³

maybe temporarily disable "w" after the first click, until the process has completed?

for the end user, if the bakers fixed all the known issues before introducing new features or changes to existing features, it would be less confusing (eg, is it a bug or is it a change to the feature?) /fwiw

+1 for the voxengo plugs

i'd be lowering the louder VSTs, rather than increasing the quieter ones, fwiw

ctrl-tab is the windows standard for switching between child windows of an app - good to hear that it still works for some things

***** apple's marketing strategy

he doesn't understand how lenses might help

ah, thanks for clarifying

are you sure it should be ALT-z and not CTRL-z? CTRL-z is the windows standard for undo

that's a paid update, fwiw

give the op a chance! he only asked the question yesterday

seems like a prompt for the qa team to do a quick sanity/regression test @ anything-other-than-100% or so

this post is a great example of how to share "steps to reproduce" when reporting an issue 👌

iirc, this setting being not on 100% also caused issues in the past?

Me too

Old issue, sonar used to handle this (gapless playback!) but that got dropped a few versions ago, so now I'd it works when transport is stopped its not considered an issue

also, it will only utilise 32bit plugins, so you'd have to have all those installed too - basically the reasons i moved to live - not muti-core aware, cannot use extra ram and 32bit only

so was it anything to do with cakewalk, or just something to do with kontakt? if it was todo with cakewalk (were the same issues apparent in stand-alone mode?) do please share your complicated solution

what is that dll it's stuck on? (image is too blurry to read...)

and then log in at least once every 6(?) months to avoid the dreaded "demo mode"

could that be whether you have "Num Lk" on or off? numlok has to be on for the numpad numbers to be recognised as such

yeah, i suppose that my point is that the forum would handle this correctly if they configured it right, but i get the impression that, like the last place, "it is what it is" and is not on anyone's task list

same... maybe it's to keep the forum un-perfect like the old one?

so yeah, the above image passes the file-size (~150k), and i stretched it with the handles, but above a certain original pixel size it gets all fuzzed up

good tips - does this help the "enlarging a thumbnail"... above is 1600x873 original size - i can stretch it with handles but it looks fuzzy