Jump to content

martinh

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5 Neutral
  1. Yea. I'm not suspecting bad intent yet, but I've spent too long dealing with business law not to seek clarification of statements like: "We have no intention of pulling the rug out from under existing Cwb users." While this may seem reassuring, I've see similar language parsed as: "We have no intention of pulling the rug out from under existing Cwb users, and that's why we're offering them the opportunity of buying Sonar subscriptions when when we shut down Cwb." Or; "We had no intention of pulling the rug out from under existing Cwb users at the time we made that statement, because we had not decided on a final product and pricing structure." As I said, it's their product and they can do what they want, I paid for Sonar Platinum before, and I'm planning to go on to "new" Sonar if its not prohibitively expensive, but I do rather wish they'd be upfront about this issue - yes or no . Anyone from Bandlab care to comment?
  2. Outside the issue of the desirability of Sonar as a new ( and potentially very good) paid product that i will probably buy, be it on a subscription or single copy model, I'm still seeing a lot of ambiguity whether users will be able to "freeze" a Cwb system and continue to run it in the future. None of the statements from Bandlab staff in this thread confirm, to me, that the "end of support" of Cwb does not include turning off the the current authorization server, and that the first time Cwb attempts its periodic reauthorization after the end of support, it will fail and shut down. I'm not saying that Bandlab cannot do this. They have no contractual obligation to continue Cwb that I can see. But it would reassure a lot of users if we could have an unambiguous answer to this question.
  3. I have to admit the financial loss was minimal compared to some other software/equipment I have purchased over the years . My irritation was more with the entire Henry Juszkiewicz dog and pony show and the fact that new ( and not always useful) features were clearly being prioritized over stability and bug fixes. IMO Bandlab had done an excellent job on stabilizing a platform that had a deserved, if sometimes overexaggerated reputation for locking up to a white screen in the middle of a project. My '72 Deluxe is still going strong
  4. I’m still on the fence here. This seems like a positive development as the product was clearly costing Bandlab money to develop and stabilize but not generating any cash in return, and probably not driving a lot of sales for other Bandlab services. This could not go on. IMO, things will be fine if a couple of conditions are met. [1] An existing Cwb installation should continue to be viable, even if it requires re-installation because of a crash, i.e., the last version should be available as a stand-alone .exe, and no longer need to "phone home" or be authorized by a server. [2] “New” Sonar should be available on a pay-per-version or per-year model that also remains viable in its present state if a user chooses not to continue to upgrade. (Yes I was one of the fools who trusted Gibson with 100s of dollars for “lifetime updates,” which is why I have some cynicism here. ) If , on the other hand, they go to a model where a subscription is required to keep existing software running, that would be the breaking point for me.
  5. Folks: A couple of bizarre things have started happening since I installed 2020.09 1) Certain reverb plug ins have started to sometimes give a huge "crash" of reverberation when I hit play, Waves Abbey Road plates (VST3 version ) and Softtube TSAR 1R (VST3) are both doing it. On the Softtube, sometimes it would not die down, but would continue looping into something like white noise. Sometimes it will do it once or twice when working on a single project. 2) Occasionally the output to the master bus simply disappears. no meters, no sound . the only way to get it back is to stop and start Cakewalk. I'm a bit mystified because no-one else has reported this, but it definitely started after 2020.09 was installed. System is an Intel Core i7-5960X CPU @ 3.00GHz , 32Mb ram, Windows 10 pro version 21H2, 64 bit. MH
  6. Me too . If you move to another part of the project without stopping the transport, Drum Replacer loses sync.
  7. Thank guys. I'm glad its not just me. I found that I can get the waveform to come up eventually, but sometimes it seems to take several clicks on the clip to get it to draw, and on one occasion I could not get it to draw without exiting and re-starting. MH
  8. HAs anyone had any problem with drum replacer recently? I'm running 2019-07 build 79 64 bit. The DR editor comes up, but it doesn't show any wave forms at all in the display?
×
×
  • Create New...