Wookiee

Thanks, I suppose it does have that sense. Appreciate your taking the time to listen and comment.

Works here mix wise.

Interesting project, with interesting results.

Nicely done track mix works nicely here.

Works well here, there is something very personal about the whole song.

I suspect we all are a little Jack, mixes are definitely improving.

Yep if you saw the lyrics you might even cry, thanks for the ears and comments.

Made me smile, nice job

Sounds good here Bob, perhaps the vocal is a little stretch in the opening, ut when the band kicks in it works fine. Solid dums. Nice job

Obviously a senior manager

Pleasantly different

Enough said, mix is OK.

I could be wrong, but I believe it has something to with plugins that support GUI resizing. Some plugins, particularly old ones don't resize. Probably the man to ask would be @Ben Staton.

Not bad (I did leave an expanded comment on YouTube.)

Thanks t, strangely I can't find your comments on Soundcloud, it's say there is a comment but it is not visible to me. There are lyrics, but the DCO-106 seemed to fill that gap.

In correct much earlier when it was announced as a public BETA, in effect he breached the NDA. I am also most certainly not your dude. I have no need to lighten or lossen up, you however need to accept my opinion is not yours. I have no intention of forcing mine on you, then I ask you don't force yours on me. As you say lighten up with your unnecessary attacks. Your previous name stunt has not been forgotten.

It works in CbB but not Cakewalk Sonar, it has been reported.

@T Boog it happens in Studio as well it has been reported to both companies.

@Heath Row, again it appears that only some people are allowed to express an opinion! Other are not, is that correct. Consequently if you and him can have your opinion, does that not mean I can not? A little speed bump? His very first video on Cakewalk Sonar was not what one would call positive.

@DNnX Is this in Cakewalk Sonar or CbB?

Not criticism just an observation, if you view it as criticism that is your choice. Seems you may be quick to judge, perhaps you have not read his recent comments regarding the introduction of the Backstage pass and Cakewalk Sonar and Cakewalk Next. You are of course entitled to your opinion, but by that very assertion so am I.

@Dusk Dave I second t's suggestion, the full version allows you to normalise to a number of different streaming platforms with a simple drag and drop.

Not defending anything, just clarifying information as I understand it. But you @John Vere do like to present the negative, raise your dislikes, I don't think I have seen a truly positive post from you. It has even been suggested that you could not be what you appear. If you have been using CbB since April 2018 then you have been demoing Cakewalk Sonar for the last 6 years, if you can't see that then I can't help you. The main difference between CbB and Cakewalk Sonar is at present the method used to generate the GUI. What Cakewalk Sonar will bring when they offer it standalone we just have to wait and see. Hopefully it will offer much of what it used to offer pre it's current implementation. If you have truly been demoing 10 leading DAW's, for years it appears, why not settle on one, or two, and get on with the whole point of owning a DAW, making music yourself, with others, or helping others capture their music. Rather than spending time being critical of a company you mainly appear to dislike. I settled on Cakewalk software 32 years ago, having tried several others, before and in-between, but returning to Cakewalk because it did all I needed to make the music I enjoy.

@AB9 at present we have no idea of what plans are in place. 1. Will Cakewalk Sonar be available as a standalone product? 2. If so what will it cost? 3. How will it be paid for. All I do know is historically under Gibson they had two payment methods and a third disappointment. A. A single one off payment which purchased the current version and one years worth of bug fixes and updates, which may include new features. B. Monthly payments for the current version, which to keep you needed to pay 12 months. If you stopped before 12 payments you only had demo software. Unless you owned a previous version, then you got to keep everything upto your last payment. C. Under Gibson just 6 months before they dropped it, they did offer a single payment, on top of that years update, for lifetime updates of the core product. But that went poorly. Prior to that scheme there was a new release every 12 months, which you could choose to update or not. With that a single payment purchased you the product and around 2 to 5 update/bug fixes during the 12 months. With the introduction of S-Plat etc, they offered a bug fix release every 4 to 6 weeks, with the odd new feature. Which brings us in a circle to the three numbered points above, but with perhaps point 4. 4. What do you get with Cakewalk Sonar standalone, historically there was three version. Studio, which had the basics but not much else. Sub $100.00 (new cost) Professional, which had more functionality and a fully functional Pro Channel $200+ (new cost) Platinum, which come with lots of toys, more synths, more Pro Channel modules, more "free" third party stuff. $450.00 (new cost) Annual upgrade from previous versions of SONAR Producer for S-Plat, as the flagship was known, was around $120.00. Conclusions we have to wait and see.

@AB9 somewhat confused here not sure how a paid for subscription is a demo when everything works. Let's try and clarify. If you pay the subscription you get full access as long as you pay the subscription monthly (or yearly), that is not a demo. (The yearly subscription is a little cheaper) If you register for access to the trial, which is three days long, you get full access. After the trial period expiries, and you decided not to proceed with paying for a subscription, it will become a demo version. Is that clear?