User 905133

Killjoy! ? Seriously, though I like the beat.

https://www.facebook.com/The-Stolen-Minks-23055729816/videos/boys-on-the-floor/17190215930/ Just Another Punk Band from Halifax: The Stolen Minks - Boys on the Floor

Just another band from Halifax

Another Halifax connection

Connection: Both bands are from the late '60s: April Wine is a Canadian rock band formed in 1969 and based in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The Hampton Grease Band was an American rock band, beginning as a blues rock group in the late 1960s in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. TRIVIA: The band was the lead-off band for Frank Zappa/Mothers last appearance at the Fillmore East on June 6, 1971. It was at this concert that Zappa and the Mothers recorded part of the Live at the Fillmore East album. Later that evening they were joined by John Lennon and Yoko Ono, also available in recorded versions.

Connection not obvious? Songs that had what I thought were female singers when I first heard them way back when . OK, OK. Lets make it easier: songs from the golden age of pop that featured novelty falsetto. OK, then, how about unbelievable use of falsetto.

Thanks for the heads up about the new set of fixes. I am not sure if I should wait for them to fix all of the issues with Syntronik 2. BTW, I think this newest round of fixes support some of the speculation from SYN2GB:

I defer to scook's excellent advice.

See advice below about learning the plug-in.

See advice below about learning the plug-in.

See advice below about learning the plug-in.

Its not the size of your sample collection, its how you use it. ? Seriously, though, I enjoyed the video. Thanks for posting the link. I find his videos usually provide a number of interesting tips based on how he does production and sound design even if I am not interested in the specific product he is demoing.

JMO: For those of you with the KV331 Everything Bundle, since you have been getting all new releases for no extra charge (unlike others who have to pay for them), if you really feel like you are missing out on the Anniversary Coupons, maybe you could sell your Everything Bundles and get on the Pay-As-You-Go plan? ?

I am not familiar with this genre, but to me it sounds like Happy Music! It also sounds like you had fun making it.

This thread is over 2 years old. JMO: Asking about creating an INS file in 2022 deserves a new topic.

This reply was written several hours ago, but not posted because to me it seemed to be quite off topic from the original thread by bringing up issues related to hardware that were far removed from what I thought the original thread was about. However, I think (not 100% sure) that the meat and potatoes of the 2022 discussion is indeed related to issues raised in the unposted draft. For that reason, I resurrected the post. This sounds a little like what I faced in the MIDI Dark Ages (before I got a parallel port MIDI interface/router) trying to daisy chain a keyboard synth [controller+synth] --> a drum machine --> a software sequencer --> the same MIDI gear at the beginning of the chain. I call that a recipe for MIDI disaster. That's why MIDI routers were created!!! But I think I get what you were originally trying to say. Fortunately for me, the hardware sequencer/sound module combo I used during the last decade [Proteus 2500] had a really nice flexible architecture which had an option to merge incoming MIDI data with the outgoing sequencer data out of Port A, Port B, or Both) among other features. Very handy. For example, Using Port B [output] MIDI clock and up to 16 tracks could be sent out to some gear that used the clock [B is for Beatz], while up to 16 other tracks that didn't need the MIDI clock could be sent to sound modules via Port A [A is for "All Else]. For real-time performances, with the hardware sequencer's "in-the-box" MIDI settings I didn't need a computer, a DAW, and an 8 x 8 interface/router.

Did I say that? I will have to see if that's another typo. ? SHEESH!!!!!!!!!! That is what I ask if you were trying to say nine hours ago when I couldn't made sense of your headache producing comment. When you wrote "Your recent take," it sounded to me like you were claiming I said that more recently than the last round of comments. Are you now agreeing that my guess from nine hours ago was correct (but from a strictly hardware/connector point of view)? In short, is your point that once there is a single 5-pin DIN MIDI cable sending MIDI data from the output of a PC's MIDI interface, another 5-pin DIN MIDI cable cannot be physically connected from a thru port on the PC's MIDI interface because the sound module only has one MIDI input? I guess maybe that's what you meant 17 hours ago: To be clear, muting some previously recorded MIDI tracks going to sound modules while recording new MIDI tracks going those sound modules might not be your personal workflow, but some people might use it.

Sorry. I had a headache from trying to sort out what bvideo was trying to say and I typed "input" instead of "thru." I am surprised that no one picked up that it was a typo. The context of the post and the following sentence ("Have MIDI sound modules changed so users can send MIDI data into hardware by using the thru port?") should have tipped people off. In any case, I corrected the typo: SHEESH!!!!! ?

My bad. My head was spinning so much from trying to parse this: I mistakenly wrote "input" instead of through. I spent so much time trying to sort that out that I neglected to proofread the comment that inspired the headache. It should have been: I think the second sentence should have tipped readers off that "input" was a typo. But I will correct that now. Thanks for calling this to my attention. BTW, coffee has helped to clear up the headache. ?

JMO: (1) It would be a waste of toner/ink and (2) it would be very expensive. Also, (3) to get an image of the entire project on a single sheet of paper might make it too small to read, depending on how many tracks you have, how wide the tracks are, and how long the tracks are.

Your post is confusing. For example, are you saying: I think my headache is from trying to understand why anyone would ever think of sending the MIDI data from a sequencer (hardware or software) into the midi input thru of a sound module. Have MIDI sound modules changed so users can send MIDI data into hardware by using the thru port? Oh. Are you saying:

I am confused by the recent revival of this old thread. What is new from what was originally discussed in 2019? Did the way Cakewalk uses MIDI data change? Is there something that was posted previously wrong? Did anyone ever follow up on these suggestions?

As noted in another thread I stumbled onto the grunged tapes when looking to see if I had updated a few other products which some Cakewalk Forum members were kind enough to mention receiving e-mails about. I indeed used the Product Manager and it worked for me. Its always nice when things work! ? I just checked the User Area and the ones listed under Windows are now the zip versions. Not sure if that varies from user to user, but it was good to see that it works. When we consider how long a couple of malformed SYN2 files were still being erroneously installed by the Product Manager (after it was first reported and users were being told it was fixed), I think it is important for users to be well-versed in multiple methods of installing sound content. In any case, its nice to see User Area downloads working properly. @Peter - IK Multimedia If you had a role in helping other IK departments to realize the need to fix the downloads, thanks!!

I remember a discussion probably a couple of months ago, where @Bristol_Jonesey and @David Baay pointed out the very important point that even if >>we<< aren't using Screensets (such as when we exclude them from the Control Bar and Workspaces), Cakewalk still uses Screensets.

This is a known problem. Don't bother reporting it to IK Multimedia.