User 905133

Excerpt from a live AC/DC cover of George Benson's cover:

In the live performance video posted above (from at least 4 different angles) I see a Minimoog. The first link above should start around 1:55 and shows the Minimoog from the back. The second link above should start around 5:30. After the camera cuts away from the guitar over to the keyboards, you can see the Minimoog being played above the organ. If you roll back to before the guitar part in that section, you can see the Minimoog.** **At approx. 5:18 (after the closeup of the "Chopsticks" section being played on the organ), the camera pulls back and you can see the Minimoog. The closeup of the "Chopsticks" section starts at approx 5:03:

"Select by Filter" has been mentioned a number of times in the forum. For future reference you can search the entire forum by clicking on "Home" near the top of the forum web page and then searching for the phrase in quotation marks in the Search Bar at the end of that line. https://discuss.cakewalk.com/index.php?/search/&q="select by filter"&quick=1

Over here (US) consumer tape decks from that era usually had 3 3/4 ips and 7 1/2 ips [inches per second]. The ones we had used RCA plugs (aka phono plugs)--at least those are the names used in the US. With adapters and/or "Y" cables, they could be plugged into a PC's sound card to digitize. Lots of reel-to-reel tapes developed issues with squealing causing some people to use a "baking" technique to try to recover the tapes. I researched the technique but never baked any of my tapes. If they don't have squealing you can just take the audio out from a reel-to-reel deck and run it into a PC's sound card. There probably are newer methods, though, and software to clean up the audio. If you play them even at a slightly incorrect speed, you could pitch shift the digitized audio. An alternative to the DIY method is to hire someone with professional equipment to digitize the tapes.

I guess I don't understand what point you are trying to make with regard to what I said. From what I have seen Windows manages different display screens and allows for different settings on each. It is possible to manually set those settings (e.g., resolution and scaling). So when I said this: my suggestion was to check [implied: adjust] those settings [implied: for each display]. The fact that on many different PC/laptop configurations there might be no problem with Windows handling different display settings (i.e., without any issues), that doesn't mean that (1) with some displays there will never be an issue and (2) that manually adjusting the settings will never be useful to overcome a display discrepancy issue.

Not sure what you mean by this. So far as I have seen Windows 10 has this built in. Or are you saying your laptop has two independent video cards/chips which can be managed independently of Windows?

See also this thread which includes some music from movies as musicals.

Nick Gravenites - Guitar, Vocals John Cipollina - Guitar, Vocals Doug Killmer - Bass Greg Elmore - Drums

This makes sense to me based on what I know of how IK does what it does. As for the resale of hardware, I understand the issue @Bruno de Souza Lino is saying. For example, I do not own any IK hardware. So, for me product manager says: So if I purchase IK hardware from someone as a resale / second hand, so far as I can see there is no way I would have access to the drivers and it is unclear if IK would add them to my account / product manager (as the new owner) without the serial number. If the serial number were on the hardware, perhaps they would.

Thanks for the explanations. I don't have any IK hardware so I was wondering about the problem you mentioned. I understand the problem better now. If the bundled software is NFR, and the seller can use the software without the hardware the seller might not want to transfer it for fear of losing access to the bundled software. But if the hardware doesn't violate an NFR condition, JMO: they should provide a way for the new owner to download the hardware drivers. I'll just have to add this to my list of things I just don't understand about why companies do things the way they do. Thanks for mentioning this issue

Did you try adjusting the display resolution and/or scaling in windows?

I don't have any blue tooth devices, so I cannot test this, but would switching driver mode trigger the wave profiler in such a way that the BT device would be made available (e.g., from ASIO to WASAPI and back to ASIO)?