DeeringAmps

Good tune, I hear that. Yeah, I'd push that drum buss up some, unless as Kurt said "that's what you are going for" ? t

Another well written and performed tune Alan. This one is more than a bit light I think... t

You pulled it down? I did enjoy Existential Girlfriend. So a ? there... t

Yep, but there's lots of Tom or tom; my father always called me "little t".

Nothin' wrong with that! ? t like that bIII to IV

Much enjoyed Wooks! t a little like and comment goes a long ways forumites...

Much enjoyed. Can't wait for the final installment! t

"I think you're outta sight" well done that Doug! Always a fan. ?'s always "stay tuned" on Doug's channel, there's way more to hear... t the butterfly on the wall of McCormick's, that's photoshopped on; right?

Much enjoyed here! I think ?'s are in order. t

Fixed it for ya. What the hell is Engine and why do I NOT need it? t

?'s Well done Anthony! t

Not familiar with Jackson, but Dylan's Subterranean Homesick Blues has a lot of lyrics. It also has meter and rhyme. I'm a little old school that way, meter and especially rhyme, are not cast in stone. BUT, that's how I work. Bear in mind, generally, my collaborator writes the words; I edit for meter and do melody. I'd need a lead sheet on this to be specific, but its your tune. You put it up for review and these are my thoughts/suggestions. Worth exactly what you paid for them... I am trying to encourage, rather than discourage. t

Ant, I'm no "expert" so take this with a grain of salt. The lyrics are way too busy, you're barely getting each line in, and its not the tempo. You've got to trim the "fat" here. In this case "less" would be way "more". No where is it written that lyrics must rhyme or conform to some sense of meter; but most do. Find the "focus" of each verse and state it; line by line. This is poetry, not prose. Once you can deliver this without running out of breath, we'll talk about recording... t

Every "like" and "comment" helps. I try to encourage the community take a minute and help our forum members out. I'm afraid it mostly falls on "deaf" ears... t as to small "m" mastering, I find it bewildering, but I "solider" on getting a track "loud", there's a million limiters to "squash" a track with, its that professional "sheen" that eludes me

Very nice Tim, I especially like when the lower register comes in on the Piano (2:30ish mark for instance). t

Visually and musically very entertaining! ?'s t can't believe I wasn't already subscribed over at YouTube, but I "fixed" it. keep 'em coming...

and the ending I'll hold the like for the coming re-mix. I think I'd try for bigger, bolder drums to give it that dance hall effect the image with it implies... t

I think the Songs section of the Forum is where you should post this request. t

+1 to that. Lovely on all fronts! ?'s t

This is first rate all around. Really liked the Glarry! And the SI strings worked nicely, not bad for a "freebie" huh? ?'s t

Another I missed, but better late than never. ? t the vocal sounds great, I miss my old 688

Nice one Tim! Evidently I'm hearing the re-mix, the sax is sitting nicely in the mix here. t had hoped the link to sensual sax was a work you had used it in...

Brilliant as always Jerry! Very much enjoyed the listen. ?'s t

Don't know how I missed this. Love that kick! ?'s t

When Jim built the new machine 3 years ago it just made sense to go with the m.2. The net result was the faster load times, one of those "unintended consequences" that didn't bite me in the a-$-$. It was just recently (Legacy of Rock install) that I maxed out the 1TB capacity. I think some of the Group Buy went on the secondary VSTi drive (EVO) as well. Some put the OS on the m.2, and that seems like a "waste". Keep the OS "lean & mean", 250gb EVO's are perfect. But I digress... t