Wookiee

How? What kind of support do you think he was referring to and the kind I was referring to?

Where did you submit the support request?

What aspect of a company that supported a product for 6 years free of charge concerns you? Very few trials have all functionality available, saving is frequently one that isn't.

Cakewalk Sonar still supports soundfont players, just install a soundfont player that has the required soundfont.

Thank you Subvibe, probably it was an experiment to see how completely inappropriate sound sources could be manipulated.

Just telling what I am hearing. I am listening on Adam A7x's set to flat gain, 0.0dB, no tonal adjustment to the rear pots on the Adams. The Clarett Pre 8 USB goes to an IK multimedia ARC Studio room adjustment box, via balanced cables, then on to the Adams again using Balanced cables. There is some room treatment for early reflections a bass trapping. The output level on the Clarett is set so a sustained signal level peak of -1dB is comfortable to listen to.

Is the Wavestate an updated Wavestation? One of the examples sound bytes, Ski Jam 2, is straight off the Wavestation.

This one appears popular on sound cloud Yes another drone but made in a slightly different way, not a modular synth in sight. Using Roland Cloud JV1080, XV 5080 and SRX instruments as Oscillator sources feeding them through some Arturia Filters, sequencing one with Steptic Step Sequencer. Thanks for listening.

Tad hot hitting the reds on my Clarett as noted there is some very distinct saturation at the beginning and end. I also felt that the opening drums were a tad muddy. Mix needs some attention in my opinion, for what that is worth, I always remember it doesn't have to be as loud as possible people have volume controls which they can use to regulate levels.

Thank you Steve.

This has now wandered off topic, apologies @Pragi but it got hijacked for no good reason.

Make your mind up, the post I responded to you used the word conclusion, go check your own responses.

It reproduced the information as good as a quote if you can't see you are in effect doing the spammers job by making what gets hidden visible again, then we can only conclude you are in fact the originator of the spam. Consequently you will be dealt with as a spammer. Unless you report it mods don't know about it, we don't spend all day, unlike yourself, in these forums looking for spam. We have lives and music to make.

One, Mods don't have the ability to add keywords to the spam blocker, do you understand? We don't sit here all day just get rid of stuff that makes you unhappy. We have lives, though it does appear you don't. Two, by quoting the spam you are aiding and abetting the spammers by reposting their spam do you understand? Three, if you repost spammers, screen shots or otherwise you will be considered a spammer and you understand what happens to spammers don't you?

No you drew the conclusion no one else. I also feel that the majority of users are intelligent enough to understand that, though there is always going to be one.

Subject to the same rules.

You obviously haven't read the rules, having two accounts is a breach of the rules and earns an immediate ban when discovered. You didn't answer the question, please don't quote the spam, you become no better than them, report it then it can be dealt with.

@pwal don't quote it report it.

Flagging a user as a spammer automatically hides their posts, as all Mod's can see hidden posts it is impossible to know if they are visible to users. What colour are these spam posts you claim to be able to see?

Possibly the fact that they are called to load in the Pro Channel, it could like the FX Chain module, there is a basic PC canister which loads additional code that is module specific, but at their heart they are simply VST 2's.

The spam is being dealt with as soon as one of us sees it. A request for additional keywords to be added has been made and a possible more permanent solution. Are you saying you can still see them even the hidden ones?

Quite possibly.

It is not unusual for DAW providers to lock a feature to their software. Steinberg, Studio One even mixcraft lock certain of their supplied instruments and FX to their product. All the Pro channel modules are VST 2 plugins, they don't appear in the VST directory, which limits their availability to other programs. Their names are not specifically the name of the module, however the calling program knows. Simples.

Why ask then?

Again nothing hacked about the Pro channel modules all genuine VST's locked to Sonar, they to are in the shared internals/pro channels directory. Simples.