Wookiee

Missed mIX 1 Mix 2 Nice.

Did you follow the instructions about removing restrictions to the BIOS?

Really wow I didn't know that, which I obliviously did. It is however still the XLN plugin management tool, whatever name it has, as it helps users manage the installation of XLN plugins, does it not? As you have corrected me so efficiently then perhaps you should advise the OP of my stupid mistake.

Have you changed the .inf file as instructed in the article you quote in the first post here? Why Roland put the restriction in 8s bizarre but there it is.

Check activation of AD drums in their plugin management tool.

What is the actual error that is stopping you.

@ZincT do you have the Sandbox feature enabled in Preferences > VST > Scan ? This can help get around the sticking issues by pushing tricky plugins into a sort of private scan to allow the others to continue.

@Michael Crepps check your auto zoom settings in Preferences

You need to report this properly to support@cakewalk.com with a sample project and full specification of you PC. Reporting it here can't guarantee support will see it quickly.

I don't use loops or samples, I record what I need.

Actually why are you stretching something you recorded? Why not record the right length?

@Cobus Prinsloo there is an option to select automation, with clips, when copying, you may need that to be selected.

@Andrey_rbkPage 632 describes the differences between different type stretching and the difference between offline and online render. Did you read that?

@Andrey_rbk the loop algorithms are changed in Preferences >Audio. I would recommend reading the reference guide on how and what the different type work and do.

@Benoit Alary TTS-1 Was removed at the request of its owner Roland. Do yoy have a history of Cakewalk Sonar ownershownship pre Bandlab?

Sending an empty template is meaningless, whilst it may contain some information the additional data from recordings may, help. It is your choice, I am just trying to get you some help, if you don't want to follow my suggestions that is your decision.

Then we will consider the matter closed.

@IgoRr I note you mention DaVinci Resolve, did you follow the instructions for updating the C++ etc libraries? As there is a known issue with Resolve installing corrupt libraries? As reporting it's simple. 1. Zip up the project, less any actual audio, to a zip file. The physical audio is not needed and just makes for an unwieldy large file. 2. Send an email to the address provided adding the zip file as an attachment. 3. Detail, the exact version and build of your OS and the exact version of your graphics device and its driver. They can then examine the meta data of the file and see if there is an issue with the GUI build and draw instructions.

@IgoRr just purely as an experiment, don't select all the channels first just try turning one on first. I had a similar issue it was a display issue, the channels were on, just not displayed as such. If it works report to support@cakewalk.com with the project and the graphics driver details.

Because I missed the word YOU out of the question why do YOU use it. Simples

@pwalpwal back in the 90's there was a lot of very unnecessary infighting between the technical press. During the 80/90's transition you have to remember it was not a matter of PC/Apple but also Amiga's, and Atari's and all the other computer platforms trying to dominate the DAW market. There was lot of evidence that those who could afford to "pay" the press got exposure. Twelve Tone Systems, the company that gave birth to the Cakewalk products was a really small one or two man band, who had no money could not afford to make such payments. Unfortunately those who have so called "power & influence" are very fruit based computers biased. Consequently they push the fruit based computer platform.

Two questions. 1. If it isn't main stream why did the piano great Mr Ray Charles use it in his studio? 2. If it is not mainstream why are you using it? Would you not rather be in with the cool kids, down with the main peeps, in with the mainstream crowd.

Historically Cakewalk always got slagged off in the early music technology press for being PC only and only supporting DX & DXi plugins. When the omnipotent beings gift to all electronic musicians was either Logic or Cubase. Irrespective of how clunky they both were on either PC or early Apple platforms. It is also strange how when Apple purchased Logic and dropped Windows support, the fact that Logic was now a single platform DAW was not an issue, but fir Sonar it was. Neither was it an issue that it dropped native support for VST & VSTi plugings, which it still doesn't support without some serious cludging.

Err don't comprehend, just because something is the only one, which is actually incorrect Sonarisn't the only PC only DAW. . If you don't test on a PC then you can't be testing for use in any DAW running on a PC from, Cubase, to Studio One, from Mixcraft (which is PC only) to Bitwig, from Pro Tools to Reaper.

@pwalpwal can I ask why you want Cakewalk to support what was; 1. A 1990's workaround for audio interfaces that did not have a native ASIO driver? 2. A Windows XP WMD/KS driver in a wrapper to disguise itself? 3. A driver that fails Steinberg's own basic ASIO driver test? Not sure why in 2025 you want to go back to a 30 plus year old technology. Why not ask Microsoft to design a native Audio API, like the MAC Audio Units that is as efficient or more efficient than ASIO or AU? That would be a much more interesting demand.