Wookiee

Incorrect read my reply above. And Incorrect if you didn't have the plugin nor the resources to obtain the same plugin it is the same problem As you note solution bounce the track to audio. The other question is why are you opening it in older versions, when you know the older version doesn't have x-sampler?

It is just a just a VST instrument, but is not in the standard VST directories because it is locked for use only in Cakewalk Sonar. I believe it is in the Shared internals directory.

Again if it is a new functionality then it will not be available simples. I didn't say the project would be complete. It would be like opening a project from a "friend" but you don't have one of the instrument plugins he/she/it/they/them uses. Exactly the same issue.

It is not that I don't like the song, just not a fan of the use of repeatedly repeating the same one or two words. So much "modern" music seems to rely on repeating the same one, two or three word phrase.

As ever miss quoted, I clearly stated certian functionality available in newer versions will not be available in older versions. Like the arranger, or x-sampler.

Sometime, with certain contributors I don't sit in front of my monitors I go for a walk around the house to see how the mix percolates. It percolated well, balanced solid mix.

Mix sounds fine, but I have to confess not a fan of repeated one or two word lyrics, The "Rabbit proof" hole just got to much.

Good mix and production, interesting vibe on the vocal, solid club bass.

Nice clean mix, well placed and balanced, vocal clear and present but in the mix. Good job.

@Pragi projects created in the new Sonar can be opened in CbB and older versions of SONAR. The only thing will be, functionality available in new Sonar obviously can't be available in the older products. Solution once opened in the older product save as new name to preserve the new file. Projects created in Cakewalk Pro Audio can be opened in any later versions of Cakewalk software called Sonar or Cakewalk by Bandlab.

Thank you sir, they are indeed mysterious boxes, but each time I play with them, they reveal more of their depths, nice to know you enjoyed its progression.

Probably limited functionality, most trials are.

Have you paid a subscription?

Hi Nigel, both, the pianoish is Arturia the twinkly is Cherry's with the arpegiator. They actually sound quite different the Cherry, IMFO, (F=furry) is warmer less digital sounding, the Arturia is a little more open but had a more digital sound, well to me. Cherry's appears to closer to the original, where Arturia have not included the Arpegiator but there is a sequencer in the effects page. Cherry's is very WYSIWG, Arturia's needs digging to get to the FX. Thanks for the ears, time and kind comments.

Thank you Bjorn, I have read a number of music theory books, the Pink & Blue plus others which as you say tell you what chords should follow, but never why. My method of finding other chords involves normally moving the wrong claw. 😀

Have you run the free Resplendent LatencyMon program, it will tell you what process is causing your latency issue. This is going to be of no comfort to you, I purchased a new PC in September last year, i9 13900k from a DAW PC specialist company, could not get it to run an acceptable audio program. Sent it back in the end, got an i9 14900K from another DAW PC specialist it runs fine. Try running LatencyMon and see what it tells you.

@Jon White you give no system details, I regularly run Sonar at 96 samples using synths from Arturia, Cherry Audio, GForce, Korg, along with guitar through an amp sim. Recording and monitoring in real-time, without issue. Perhaps if you provided details of your computer, cores threads speed, amount of RAM, number of disks, your audio interface make model and the audio driver, the number of samples in the buffer. The "minimal" loading plugins might help. Failing to provide such information in the first instance and just dissing the product is not indicative of someone who really wants help, just to rant.

Thanks and thank you for the comments on Soundcloud.

I believe the scanner has been updated to account for this issue, however it would be wise to report to support as a precautionary measure.

@altoricky try a rest and rescan. Steinberg thought it be really great to change the "where are VST3's stored" rules by adding the requirement to a directory with .VST3 on the end so. Where say it would have been; Program files/common files/VST3/joessuperinstrument as the top level directory for the plugin, it has now got to be; Program files/common files/VST3/Joessuperinstrument.vst3 as the top level directory for the plugin.

Thank you sir. Nice to know that my keyboard meandering resonates with someone else.

@FreeEarCandy you are the second person to bring Schrodinger's cat to my attention this week. Such that through the power of thought experiment alone, I fired up the Falcon, nipped back to 1935, and checked what he actually put in the box, they are not going to be happy if they ever open that thought.

Mix sound fine here perhaps a little hot need to turn down the volume on SC.

Most has probably been said, but it is hot for my taste, the snare sounds like it has had all the life squashed out of it. But if you are happy with it then... As noted above the mix needs some work, apologies.

The mix is tad hot for my tastes, other than that a mix and production up to your normal standard