Jim Roseberry

Those who think most professionals are using Mac: I get calls on a daily basis from professional composers... who simply can't get the speed/configuration (from Apple) they need to effectively work. If you watch TV/Movies... a custom PC was used to create the music on almost all of them. Composer Tim Wynn was a long time Cakewalk user (has since switched to Cubase). Tim is now scoring feature films for the likes of Marvel. I can say with 100% certainty that he's not using a Mac. Nor is his colleague Ernie Lee... as we just shipped his new machine I do think the Apple Mini is a slick little machine. It's pretty cool for what it is (small form-factor simple machine).

If it takes someone more than about 15 minutes to tweak Win10 for maximum DAW performance, they don't know what they're doing. If it takes hours/days, they're learning/experimenting. I build/configure machines literally every day. (Have done so for 25+ years) Lots of tweaks involved... but I know exactly what needs to be done... and it's the same every time. I'd liken building/configuring PCs to Algebra. If you know how to solve the equation, you'll always get the right answer.

A bit over-blown. Win10 needs properly configured once. For someone who knows what they're doing, that process isn't lengthy (probably about 15 minutes). We have Apple machines here to support VE Pro clients. I tweak OSX as well (disable power-management, etc).

I recall someone on these forums saying that the 12900k was faster than the M1. He had actually benckmarked both... comparing side-by-side. Don't know who that might have been... 😁 The 12900k is an amazing CPU. Yes, you need robust cooling. Heat is nowhere near Threadripper. IOW, It's possible to build a quiet machine.

One great machine with something like the 12900k and a RTX 3xxx series video card (with 0dB fan mode) would excel at both running DAW applications, video editing,... as well as games. You don't want to build something like this fully passive-cooled. You could... but it would be a thermal-throttling disaster. 😉

If you're talking about more recent make CPUs (5950x and 12900k), robust air-cooling isn't enough when the CPU is under heavy load. Closed-loop water-coolers are maintenance-free. You don't need to add coolant, etc. With a water-cooler, you're dealing with both fan and pump noise. Important to get one with a quiet pump (quiet fans are easy) You'll see guys on YouTube building Threadripper machines using a NH-U14S or NH-D15 (large air-cooler). Yeah, it's quiet. 😁 Put that CPU under load... and it thermal-throttles CPU clock-speed WAY down. Kind of defeats the purpose of having a $1k+ CPU. The same is true for the 5950x and 12900k (just not as extreme).

All is well here... Certainly didn't mean to drop-the-ball! I was thinking you'd decided against getting a machine... and that's the last I remember of our conversations. FWIW, my Email is easy to remember (jim@studiocat.com) You're always welcome to send an Email... or give me a call/text.

8700k has six cores at 4.7GHz Max Turbo 9900k has eight cores at 5GHz Max Turbo It's an upgrade... but not a huge difference in performance. Both CPUs are socket 1151.

All about performance expectation... If you expect workstation type performance, laptops aren't the solution (M1 or otherwise).

Fast... compared to what? The 5950x or 12900k?

Define your expectations. If you expect the M1 to compete with hard-core "workstation" CPUs, it doesn't do that. The 5950x smokes the M1. The new 12900k bests the 5950x both single-core and multi-core.

Typing isn't faster... but the 12900k exists in the here/now. If you want to run heavy loads at lowest possible latency, there's not a better CPU.

I'm typing this on a 12th Gen i9-12900k based DAW. 😉

When it comes to low latency audio, the 11900k is a performance step backward (vs the 10th Gen 10900k). The newest 12900k (12th Gen) smokes them both.

Yes, the last three speaker types are bass specific 12" and 10" speakers. You can also "resize" (virtually) any of the speakers... so you could create a 15" or 18" version (to mix along side the stock speakers)

How is everyone liking this synth? On paper, it looks amazing... Is it capable of using multiple CPU cores?

Speaker Shaper sounds great. My favorite of all speaker-sim plugins. IMO, on par with the UA OX Amp Top Box (hardware)

At $500, the Poly-D is a lot of fun. You can program Mini-Moog type basses/leads quickly.

😁 It's a simple phrase... but certainly true Tosklink the the optical port used to carry either Optical S/PDIF or Lightpipe. I've used a LOT of different (Tosklink) Lightpipe/Optical-S/PDIF based gear over the past three decades (digital mixers, audio interfaces, external converters, keyboards, etc). It's always worked. If something is defective, that's an entirely different matter.

A single Lightpipe connection has enough bandwidth to carry 8-channels of 44.1k/48k audio. If you wish to work at 88.2k/96k, many devices allow you to use two Lightpipe ports together (called SMUX). IOW, It takes two Lightpipe ports to achieve 8-channels of either input or output at 88.2k or 96k. SMUX (88.2k or 96k) is the only reason you'd need two cables for either input or output. If the DP88 was setup as word-clock master at 44.1k or 48k: You'd need the DP88's clock setting to be set to Internal You'd need a Toslink cable from the DP88's Toslink output to the MOTU's Toslink Input. Both the DP88 and MOTU Toslink ports would need to be set to Lightpipe (not optical S/PDIF) The MOTU would need to be set to receive word-clock from its Toslink input As long as everything is properly functional, it has to work. These principles apply to any combination of gear connected via Lightpipe.

When you're connecting two devices digitally (via Lightpipe), the both must be sharing a single/common clock source. That means either the audio interface or the DP88 must be the master clock. Once you've decided which is the master... the other unit must look to its Lightpipe input port for word-clock. (Word-clock is imbedded in Lightpipe) Once both devices are running from a single/common clock, the small pops/ticks will be gone. If you try to merge two digital audio streams... each running on a separate clock, you will always experience small pops/ticks/etc.

I've been running an Orion Studio Synergy Core for a few months. Absolutely rock-solid When connected via Thunderbolt, current Antelope audio interfaces can yield sub 1ms total round-trip latency. (Obviously the machine has to be able to keep up with the load... or you'll hear glitches) I view the onboard DSP as a bonus (not the primary reason for choosing/using the interface) Antelope has a way of over-complicating things (names of products, manuals, etc) If you can get beyond that, the interfaces are excellent. The onboard DIs and preamps are the best I've heard from any audio interface. Ultra low-latency performance is amongst the best currently available. Routing/mixing flexibility is similar to RME's Total-Mix (but with more DSP options). Converters and clock are (IMO) the best you'll find in any current audio interface. Almost all of our professional composer clients are using Antelope audio interfaces.

You won't gain anything by managing the VM Swapfile manually. You don't want Windows to start using the VM Swapfile (in lieu of enough physical RAM). Even if it's on a SSD, it's terribly slow compared to physical RAM. This will kill performance...

It was sorted within 30 to 60 minutes. SQ80 sounds pretty good (messed with it for just a couple minutes).

Bought the upgrade to V Collection 8 + SQ80. Got the V Collection 8. Don't see anything in my account about the SQ80.