-
Posts
5,716 -
Joined
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by User 905133
-
https://www.roland.com/uk/blog/rd-stage-pianos-history/#:~:text=In 2001%2C the next big,the JV and XV Series. https://cdn.roland.com/assets/media/pdf/RD-500_OM.pdf https://www.roland.com/global/products/hp700_series/#:~:text=Roland's HP700 series supports your,instrument that grows with you. https://static.roland.com/assets/media/pdf/HP704_702_eng02_W.pdf
-
In another thread on a different issue, David Baay wrote something that explains what I wrote (see above): This makes sense!! Thanks.
-
Instrument files (*.ins) shouldn't affect whether or not CbB (Cakewalk by Bandlab) sees your interface. Years ago I borrowed a Mio usb to midi interface cable to test drive and it worked very well, but that was on an XP SP3 PC. Does the interface show up as a midi device in Preferences > MIDI > Devices? A screenshot might help to figure out what's going on. Also, under MIDI > Playback and Recording, does it say MME or UWP? Update: For the Roland Instrument file which contains the definition for the RD-700GX, see the links on this page . However, the manual I found for the Digital Piano RD-700 is copyrighted 2001, which is not quite 30 years old. What model do you have? If yours is really from 1994, there might not be an *.ins file for your model. The earliest Roland.ins file I have is from 1998. I sometimes have good luck searching for *.ins files on the internet, so I will look to see if there is an instrument definition for your model.
-
What do you mean when you say Cakewalk was designed to attract people to the bandlab platform?
-
Message I started: but when I came back to finish up, John Vere had written: But there seems to be a new problem (or a manifestation of the original problem that didn't get fixed): First of all, are you using the same file or did you make a "Save As" copy of it to try to repair? That might or might not be necessary; that's just what I have done. Second, are you loading the project in CbB's Safe Mode? Not sure it will help, but it might be worth trying. NOTE: There are plenty of people trying to help you with this one and I am hesitant to interfere, but since no one else mentioned these two points, here's my "two-cents worth" just in case they help.
-
The only time I lose the metronome is when I accidentally change it to MIDI. So, last night I tried to get rid of (exclude) the grooveplayer in the Menu-based Cakewalk plug-in manager. It was excluded (or so it said), I rescanned plug-ins, and I even restarted CbB, but I couldn't make the Metronome fail to sound. I still have the metronome today. So I renamed this: to GroovePlayer.pulled & rebooted CbB. That gave me tht Missing plug-in error warning box which included this: GroovePlayer (Track: 'LRS track bus'). And that's how I got rid of the Metronome. So I shut down CbB, renamed it back to GroovePlayer.dll, rebooted CbB, and viola--I had the metronome back. Note: I have some older Grooveplayer.dll files in storage areas of an external BU HDD, but I don't think those are being picked up by CbB. They are older than the one from 4/24/2018 (9/12/2013 and 8/10/2011) and are smaller (the 9/12/2013 file is either 795 KB, or 659 KB for the x86 version; the 8/10/2011 is 682 KB). Perhaps these details can be helpful in determining if you have the correct dll and if it's in the right place. As for editing the registry, I don't mess with that.
-
I also had a version of some audio software Magix did that was geared towards kids. I think it was in the Win 98 SE era and might have had the word Jam in the title. I might still have the manual somewhere. Maybe it was called Music Maker; I'll have to look. I used Cakewalk and I got the Magix thing because one of my kids was interested in making music and I thought Cakewalk was a bit too advanced. Anyhow, maybe Magix had Music Maker and Movie Maker as an audio-video product line.
-
OOOPS. I guess no one suggested to @DNnX to add - SOLVED to the Topic.
-
The planned narrowing down of reactivation windows for Cakewalk by Bandlab ?
User 905133 replied to Mr No Name's question in Q&A
Would you be kind enough to post the link to the specific post where this is stated? Thanks. -
Future Re-install of Cakewalk after Sonar is Available?
User 905133 replied to dalemccl's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
What are you basing this assertion on? If its from a reputable source, please post the link. If it's just someone's opinion, does the source say it's a fact or identify it as speculation? If it originates from you, what facts did you put together to come up with this conclusion? -
Thanks for the clarification. I have the manual for Sony's Screenblast Movie Studio (2003). I am sure I test drove the software when I first got it, but I have no files on my current computers. There might be some tests I did on an XP SP3 PC. For a few years I played around with Nero software, even tested editing some OBS captures with it.
-
I get these things: I just checked with Everything (Void Tools) and the zip files for the Sound Libraries I have been updating are definitely eating up my drive space. I have also been taking screenshots of My PC to keep an eye on the free space on my HDD. Not sure if the Sound Libraries will install properly (assuming I don't run out of GBs). But the last IK Product Manager update I did has the % meter.
-
Looks like Tonex CS has also been updated:
-
My recollection is that Sonic Foundry sold both Sound Forge and Vegas to Sony (both of which Magix later acquired). I didn't follow the products closely, but I believe Sony tweaked / rebranded these products (both had Sony Screenblast versions at one point and there was evidently a Sony Screenblast version of Acid, also acquired from Sonic Foundry). As I understand it Magix took the Sony versions and tweaked / rebranded them. I thought Movie Maker was a Windows Product. 1999 SOS Article on Sonic Foundry's Vegas Pro. I don't really know the complete history; so maybe somewhere in there Sony also acquired software from Windows and merged it into their version of Vegas? In 2003 Sony called a version of their video editing software, "Screenblast Movie Studio." In my admittedly limited experience, "Screenblast" referred to the non-Pro versions of various products Sony acquired.
-
Very well done (clear, focused, positive, etc.) set of explanations / demonstrations showcasing a whole lot of features Next offers.
-
Welcome back, I think. In 2020 you wrote: Now you jump onto a thread from 2021 with: It seems you came back to complain about something not covered in the post from 2020. Why?
-
As the OP stated: Also, please note that the OP hasn't been around since almost a year ago when the initial post was made. Please note, I voluntarily removed my posts because they addressed other high-contrast possibilities (i.e., non-100% Black and White solutions): I'd suggest if others are interested in requesting and/or discussing high-contrast themes, that is a a different topic.
-
I didn't assume anything of the sort. If you took the time to read what the OP wrote: when you read what I wrote: you might have realized that I was simply verifying what the OP stated. That being said, I think it's fair to say that if something has worked continuously in Cakewalk/SONAR and suddenly no longer works in Cakewalk Sonar, it might be of interest for the developers to know that PSYN II didn't make the transition into Sonar. I made no assumptions about the cause; I made no assumptions about possible remedies.
-
Since Cakewalk Sonar correctly picks up the presence of PSYN II, but fails to properly display the PSYN II's UI, it seems like a bug to me. If Cakewalk Sonar correctly displays the other legacy instruments, it seems to me it should also display PSYN IIs UI correctly.
-
Since Cakewalk Sonar correctly picks up the presence of PSYN II, but fails to properly display the PSYN II's UI, it seems like a bug to me. If Cakewalk Sonar correctly displays the other legacy instruments, it seems to me it should also display PSYN IIs UI correctly. UPDATE (2024-03-27): See Canopus' suggestion:
-
HOW TO RECORD KORG M50 COMBI SOUNDS IN CAKEWALK
User 905133 replied to Steven Gerard's question in Q&A
Glad you solved the issue. By the way, when I wrote this? and these? I was not asking, "Have you looked in this and these?" I was asking if this? and these? are the docs for your gear. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I looked through the first manual (this?) and didn't see anything that would help, so I looked for more manuals and wanted to know if I was looking at the correct manuals for your gear before reading through those, too.