User 905133

On the other hand, I have tried to make more modern usage of Sampletron 2 in part with some of my own virtual "tapes" [aka clips], but it still comes out closer to an archaic process than something modern sounding.

Really! ?

If part of that is due to the hidden Edit button, in my experience it only took about 137 errors (hitting the Quote button) before I re-trained myself to an estimated 72% accuracy level on the first try and then an estimated additional 23% accuracy rate catching myself before hitting Submit. For the remaining 5% I have started to edit the accidental Quote-Instead-of-an-Edit into something other than my previous post with what should have been an edit. Seriously! I am no longer annoyed with myself when I do a Quote-Instead of-and-Edit!

Free as in Seems rather generous considering he hold several patents. Donations are accepted, though. Impressive resume, too.

Yeah. For that matter why would anyone use a flute, or a french horn, or strings, or tympani, or even square and sawtooth waves or pianos or acoustic guitars in modern music. They are all throwbacks to music made by ancient people. ? In fact, so many sounds from the past 10-15 year have become hackneyed. ?

I know I used to do tunes in 7 and 5 in Cakewalk. I am not sure I could find those project files though to see how I did it. I don't recall it as being a problem. Maybe it worked because I used a staff, not the PRV?

Another super popular favorite of college radio station disk spinners back in the day.

She bop, he bop, we bop, I bop, you bop, they bop!!!!!

Yup--Lauper took Hazard's song and completely owned it!!!! Lots of great tunes on that album, She's so unusual!

Yeah, I knew that, but now I wonder if he has also has a legal basis to have a lawyer issue a take down notice. I was going to report it to YT, but the only reporting category that came close was offensive content.

I wholeheartedly nominate this disaster (JMO) for the Hall of Shame, not just because it makes the song sound like garbage and not because it purports to be AI and the AI sounds awful in and of itself, but also because it sounds nothing like Mike Nesmith either with the Monkees or without them. As positive as Micky Dolenz has been over the decades and as anti-Corporate Take Down Notices as I am, I think Micky should encourage the lawyer for whoever owns the rights to the song/recording to demand the song be taken down.

Excerpt from a live AC/DC cover of George Benson's cover:

In the live performance video posted above (from at least 4 different angles) I see a Minimoog. The first link above should start around 1:55 and shows the Minimoog from the back. The second link above should start around 5:30. After the camera cuts away from the guitar over to the keyboards, you can see the Minimoog being played above the organ. If you roll back to before the guitar part in that section, you can see the Minimoog.** **At approx. 5:18 (after the closeup of the "Chopsticks" section being played on the organ), the camera pulls back and you can see the Minimoog. The closeup of the "Chopsticks" section starts at approx 5:03:

"Select by Filter" has been mentioned a number of times in the forum. For future reference you can search the entire forum by clicking on "Home" near the top of the forum web page and then searching for the phrase in quotation marks in the Search Bar at the end of that line. https://discuss.cakewalk.com/index.php?/search/&q="select by filter"&quick=1

Over here (US) consumer tape decks from that era usually had 3 3/4 ips and 7 1/2 ips [inches per second]. The ones we had used RCA plugs (aka phono plugs)--at least those are the names used in the US. With adapters and/or "Y" cables, they could be plugged into a PC's sound card to digitize. Lots of reel-to-reel tapes developed issues with squealing causing some people to use a "baking" technique to try to recover the tapes. I researched the technique but never baked any of my tapes. If they don't have squealing you can just take the audio out from a reel-to-reel deck and run it into a PC's sound card. There probably are newer methods, though, and software to clean up the audio. If you play them even at a slightly incorrect speed, you could pitch shift the digitized audio. An alternative to the DIY method is to hire someone with professional equipment to digitize the tapes.

I guess I don't understand what point you are trying to make with regard to what I said. From what I have seen Windows manages different display screens and allows for different settings on each. It is possible to manually set those settings (e.g., resolution and scaling). So when I said this: my suggestion was to check [implied: adjust] those settings [implied: for each display]. The fact that on many different PC/laptop configurations there might be no problem with Windows handling different display settings (i.e., without any issues), that doesn't mean that (1) with some displays there will never be an issue and (2) that manually adjusting the settings will never be useful to overcome a display discrepancy issue.

Not sure what you mean by this. So far as I have seen Windows 10 has this built in. Or are you saying your laptop has two independent video cards/chips which can be managed independently of Windows?

See also this thread which includes some music from movies as musicals.

Nick Gravenites - Guitar, Vocals John Cipollina - Guitar, Vocals Doug Killmer - Bass Greg Elmore - Drums

This makes sense to me based on what I know of how IK does what it does. As for the resale of hardware, I understand the issue @Bruno de Souza Lino is saying. For example, I do not own any IK hardware. So, for me product manager says: So if I purchase IK hardware from someone as a resale / second hand, so far as I can see there is no way I would have access to the drivers and it is unclear if IK would add them to my account / product manager (as the new owner) without the serial number. If the serial number were on the hardware, perhaps they would.