kitekrazy1

So much of this now is becoming a rocket science. I find it confusing with these Intel cores. AMD seems easier. I still think of replacing my rarely used AMD FX6300 with an AMD 8 core 64 watt system. The reality for me is doing get carried away with wanting muscle car performance. I don't ever need to be able to run 200 tracks when I rarely reach 30. Overhead that I will never use. You have to wonder if MS doesn't change their mind with the TMP requirement when people stay on W10 past it's existence. Then there are 3rd party developers who can risk a loss with W11 as a minimum requirement. That would probably turn more people to using Reaper. No more updates from using W10 doesn't worry me. In the software world the amount bad updates seems to increase using something.

Sounds nice esoecially if one is too look for a budget build. This CPU is under $200

Looking for the best = multiple responses. The best is when you can demo them instead of listening to a recording. We have that of treating samples like they are bakery products as we have our own imaginary date of them being moldy. It also depends on your needs.

I hardly ever had that issue. They give you a choice. Removing user control in installations is getting less. Amazed how many aax get installed on a system.

Sometimes I don't like their bundles with two separate players. If I didn't get Fantasy Orchestra I probably would've went for Solstice but the bundle isn't that appealing. I would spend 239 just to get Solstice. Eventually a deal would come again and maybe slightly less.

When I see these libraries that are synths, much of this can be done with VSTs instead of a Kontakt library,

It's a reality when other developers take over another code.

the listener doesn't really care what gear was used I doubt even young producers care about stuff that didn't exist when they were born. I doubt they are into analog vs. digital or tape emulations. They only way they do care is because they wandered into some forums.

https://help.uaudio.com/hc/en-us/articles/14996936104468-Native-UAD-Plug-in-GUI-Blurry-or-Too-Large-on-Windows Install/Update WebView2 I've had a DAW reject that WebView2.dll UAD adds a lot of stuff to use their plugins. Great stuff but I think my life would go on if my systems is free of UAD. So I'm not a fanboy

It's still there.

We are so sorry for the delay in delivering your software! While most software orders process immediately, something about your order did not verify correctly. This can usually be resolved quickly during business hours. Fortunately, you do not need to submit another order for the software! We have assigned someone to investigate and personally see your order through the system. We'll contact you as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience My first fail ordering from them. Instant gratification lost.

https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/TRackS6MAXUp--ik-multimedia-t-racks-6-max-software-suite-upgrade-from-any-t-racks-product

Wow a company that updates their software more than their distribution app

Unfortunately I had to add that. Just another turn off of using software these days.

It doesn't show up in the license manager - only 3.4

I prefer to live with my disappointments. They are just presets. No big deal to me. They don't eat space.

no one does that

confused

I've been going thru some. I check out the low price ones so if I buy it wont be a disappointment.

It doesn't matter if you are the one taking in the revenue.

Installed and deleted UA Connect. Yesterday it reared it's ugly head during a plugin scan. Arturia does the same thing but I like them. I could justify UA Connect if I had an audio interface. Imagine if NI did the same thing............ Sad that our paid software has the behavior of viruses.

A great excuse not to spend that kind of money on an EQ even though Fabfilter is probably worth. I wonder if the average listener who know noting about music production ever says this would've been better if the EQ was right. Someone will always convince us that's not true. Yet we flock to see our favorite group perform in a venue that is nothing like a recording studio. There is a big difference between those who pay for your production and those who listen to it.

I was wondering if someone was going to comment after the after the only one post shills. Not the best marketing BTW, Sub only is probably a greater death than when Gibson stopped development. I would imagine most of the subscribers are not western based. I'm wondering when the other guitar company is going to erode the popularity of another DAW. Meanwhile another company uses their licensing as a marketing tool and it seems to work.

If you have Analog Pro you get some free presets to sample.

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/asrock-issues-bios-update-to-address-ryzen-9-9800x3d-failures-warns-of-misinformation-about-failures Yikes. I have an older AsRock board for my Intel system. It seems every manufacturer has a go around with quality issues. I've always used Asus and Gigabyte as well. There was another article that a fix was revert to a previous BIOS. Anytime there was a BIOS update on a board I read what it is and if it doesn't affect me then I pass. I'm less confident these days in upgrading hardware. Since I spend more time buying software instead of actually using it I don't need a powerful system.