DeeringAmps

All good here as well. Single Pass, Loop Recording, Single Pass with Punch In, Loop and Punch In (with roll up and out), and Loop and Punch set to the same points. I'll Mark the Thread SOLVED! t @Noel Borthwick Thank You! Should I add link to Build 147 on page 2 to the title?

That's for sure! I bounced 4 side stick hits from EZD, that becomes the "source track"; nice big initial transient makes it easy to "see". Loop that back, invert phase on one and I (you or as the French would say "Vous", meaning all youse guys) should get a "perfect null". Its never perfect, and as often as not the Babyface is 1 sample off. No need for "puny humans" to introduce any error at all... (Naturally "puny humans" was said with tongue in cheek) Even the UFX was 1 sample, haven't "calibrated" the UFX+ yet. When it became obvious there was an "issue", I hightailed it for the office to sick Noel et al on it. HTH, t

Did you try “Punching In”? t

I think Wookie and Rural have it right. Sounds good! I could see it under the credits on a trailer. tom Oh, and welcome to the forum.

You seem to have fallen through the cracks with this one Colin. I'll admit I don't recall the original, but your cover sounds great. ?'s t

Loop and single pass are working perfectly! t

Only tested Punch so far, all 4 punches are aligned to one another. However all are 181 samples Early! This is with a 64 sample buffer. Single pass and Loop recording are "spot on" (well 1 sample off, pretty much typical with my RME Babyface) t

What I'm seeing with the Babyface is its the buffer plus 118 samples, so at a buffer of 64 I see 182 samples late. But Noel will have it fixed and it will be like it never happened... t

Good question @John Vere, I don't know; generally I start projects later on the timeline. But as you can see both 2101.01 tracks "started" at 0, as I would expect. Mostly I used 1:01 so I could show the "Inspector" and zoom in enough to illustrate the "lag". However, I "discovered" the problem down stream in a project, so its an "issue". I can confirm that dropping the clip late was consistent across the timeline. Interestingly, the RME Babyface was "latency plus 118 samples late" The RME UFX+ was "latency plus 35 samples late" Doing a Loop Back test (started at measure 3 BTW) confirms 2021.04 Build 98 is "spot on" in its timing. Well as "spot on" as I ever see, moving the "Loop Back" 1 sample forward on the time line (meaning 1 sample early) yields the best "null" with the source track's phase reversed. Pretty typical to what I see with both the RME Babyface and RME UFX; haven't tested the UFX+ as of yet. t Here's a screenshot of the loop back in 2021.04 Build 144

Rolling back to 2021.01 solves the problem. NOTE: I have not as yet done a "loop back" test (I will and report back if there is an issue), but I am confidant that all will be well! t

SOLVED! Link to Build 147 is in Noel's post on Page 2 (I'd link it, but its beyond my tech grade...) 2021.04 is dropping clips late! See the image below, Track 1 was recorded in 2021.01 and started at Beat 1:01 (0 sample) Track 2 was recorded in 2021.04 and started at Beat 1:01 (0 sample) but dropped at Sample 2166. The RME Babyface was set to 2048 and YES Sync and Caching was set to Use ASIO Reported Latency This will NOT do! tom I know this belongs in the Feedback thread...

You could pull the keys down a bit. Goggled Prymetherin earth day 2021; didn't get a hit That's a thing? t

Wrong! You need it, trust me; at $35 its a steal. I am convinced now though; I WILL NEVER AGAIN, PAY FULL PRICE EVER, FOR ANY IKM PRODUCT... sorry to shout, but geez. t

I do believe these are open back cans. Love mine and use the 770’s (closed back) for tracking.

I guess we are all in agreement; a very strong lyrical effort here. ?'s! t if I had some time I'd take a run at that acoustic guitar track

Jesse channeling 60's Dylan? I like this one a lot Jesse, very cool. t

More Kirby goodness! ?'s almost that "electric sitar" sound on the solo, who made those? t evidently Doug's not sharing ?

As always Mark, great storytelling, performances and production. t I left that with about 10 secs left in the tune, why does SoundCloud just randomly place my comments? Why am I asking You?

This'll lower the blood pressure for sure! Thanks. t "This'll" is not a contraction of "this will"; learn somethin everyday I guess...

What he said! t btw, ?'s back for one tiny crit; let that last note fade out naturally...........................................................................

Sounds great here on the DT 990's. ditto that! You or the vocalist write the lyrics? t

?'s, big ?'s t lef my comments over ta utube, y'all should too...........................................................................

@Bill PhillipsExactly. The template is a cwp file. I don’t use the cwt extension. All my templates are saved as “read only”, then when I save I’m prompted to “save as”. I don’t have anything near as comprehensive as Decker, but his work flow makes perfect sense. I have a basic 8 buss template I work from. As I said above, six months ago I could have thrown some energy into this. t

Very interesting interview to be sure! I think that many Mixers are known for the samples they bring to their drum tracks; seems to be a "signature" thing. Kind of validates Superior Drummer 3 (or insert your drum VSTi of choice "here"). Six months ago I would have been "all in" on your project, but as vaccinations sweep the country, hopefully the wife and I will be able go back out on the road; so its a commitment I just can't in "good faith" make. (I literally haven't been in the studio in over a month, I have a new UFX+, still sealed in the box, waiting to be put in the rack) Good luck on the project. PM a cwp, and if I can squeeze some time, I'll have a look and offer suggestions... t

Yes, move “Deals” to “General Music”. t