Will.

Not a bad idea. This would be an awesome addition to the naming feature. I normally add it to the projects name and clips.

This is good and all, but the request needs to run still. We don't need to rely on third party software to do a task as simple as keeping the names clean.

It will help thousands of users if it was in the insert menu from the FX bin.

yep + 1

You can already change the background and foregrounds of any clip from the inspector view.

This is wrong. It is not for Audio Production, but merely to bring an HD system performance to the standard onboard sound card of the PC, for better enhanced quality and connection with HIFI systems (Surround Sounds with Dolby.) It was build for gaming sound and streaming. I'm a gamer too and I have this. These are two different worlds. If you download better Standard Asio Drivers like "Asio4All" you might get a better performance. It comes with higher latency settings from 0 to 2048 ms.

The old man used to listen to Bela every single day and he was a string player too. I would watch him hammering with two fingers on his own compositions for hours on end. Guess that's why apart from Guitar and piano and little bit of drums - Cello kinda grew on me too. I'll never be as good as him with that double bass snaps and emotions on it though. The glissando, gelato, fermata oh-man! It brings back sweet memories of him.

You can't force me to use the browser if it doesn't work for me and my workflow. End of story.

Dinosaurs died out eons ago. This is the future. Stop holding this DAW back in the past!

I have search for this, but cant find a thread for it. Option to have a "Plugin Search|Search Audio FX option" right on the FX Bin area by double clicking anywhere on an empty space in it | OR | by CTRL+Right Click (for quick access) and as an option available by right clicking and have it first in that MENU too. Reason: Not every user make use of the browser to add effects or instruments/synths. My workfow is that of in place inserts - where i am in the project and not having to move away from that. It's a quick workflow (Extremely important.) Right clicking in the clip view to bring it up will be even more helpful too.

Was looking for the evidence through all my requests, but dang! There's too many to read. ? Real-talk! I was told this in my early days of requests on the forum.? I too +1 this.

Glad I could help. ☺

It depends on the votes to your request.

I too use the Youlean Meter. Those read you see is not clipping - thats the reduction of -0.1dB and 0.3dB. The reference track is obviously translating more fuller and thicker in body - that's why you see a "red line" in reduction at the top. With the other one, the limiter of the online service you use was only catching peaks here and there, because it lacks in body. The only difference between the images: The 1st images is -3dB softer than the reference. This isn't a bad thing as Youtube require a -3dB in volume reduction so does few other popular streaming services too. Infact the 1st image LUFS reading seems spot on for "CD" which is - 9dB. Also never rely too much on LUFS readings. I often flip between 3 just to make sure they're readings are the same. I rely 60% - 70% of the time on my ears than any meter reading on plugins, although one is permanently on the master track.

Auto-tune Evo full version is free on this site. https://surgesounds.com/autotune-free-vst-software/

Question I always ask: Why? When one can play them yourself with more creativity and flexibility?

You have to save the workspace with the template. You first save the workspace and then the template.

Project3.mp4 Project3.mp4 Still: Do that input echo off on all tracks. This works, it's always my fix to this problem. I don't know how and when this gets enabled when inserting an Instrument (My case with the TTS-1), but it happens. Project3.mp4 Project3.mp4

It's more than X3. The move will be guaranteed. The fun part is, you can install Cakewalk by Bandlab on top of Sonar X3 and have both X3 and CbB on your system. How about that sauce for you?

You've got the TTS-1 in there right? Turn off all the input echoes on the channels one by one manually. I've encountered this twice this month. It's always when I add the TTS-1. Not sure how and why it happened.

+1

Guess who is 36 this year and been using Cakewalk since 2010 independently. HipHop/EDM/House/Pop - I've done it all with this in the box. Fom chops, PitchShift, Scrooge Voices - you name it. Forgot whats the name of this round spinning thingy. ? Yeah, I should frame this!

The Inputs of a Send | Patch Point from an Aux or Audio Track dont seem to work. It doesn't force the Input to Mono as with Instrument tracks inputs. Wonder if this is a bug?

This is exactly why I'm asking this. I go crazy with patch points. Anything from sidechain, isolating Drums/Vocals/Guitars or Reverbs. So this comes down to the actual question: Why does the patch have the LSR inputs but not from the send? Wont that make it more flexible? Meaning: Sending the channel straight to the L/R input from its send? It made sense at the time of asking myself this. (lol)

I think: I know the answer to this - I might be wrong too. Question: Why don't Cakewalk have Mono Sends? UPDATE: I know why this was on my mind. So . . . "The QUESTION should be: Why doesn't the Input of a Send or Patch Point force the signal to Mono?"