DeeringAmps

You left out the “or so”. Let me be clear, I have no “inside” information. Just years of being a customer since Cakewalk Pro 3.0. t

Those are guaranteed to bite you in the ar$e!

Think this will stop all the "hand wringing" upstairs and down? DOUBT IT! But rest assured, all of those whose sphincters are in a knot, Noel and the crew WILL NOT leave you "twisting in the wind". The "NEW" SONAR will open all your existing .cwp files AND all your old .wrk files; (and all the "questions" ad nauseam you have raised). I personally guarantee it! As Howard Hughes, famously said, "If this goose don't fly I will leave this country and not return!" Better yet, if the "new" SONAR does not open all your existing .cwp files, I will personally refund the $200 or so you paid for it!* There, that is all children, you can now return to your regularly scheduled programing... t *limited to the first ten who can demonstrate that a "working" cwp file will not open in new SONAR

10 bar progression? Way COOL!! always enjoy your work, big fan! t

I’ve never bonded with Neutron or Nectar. Relied on Ozone, but lately it’s just the EQ match followed by Lurssen then the FabFilter limiter to catch any stray peaks. My small “m” mastering is still evolving… t

@Lynn Wilsonthanks for bumping this back to the top of the page. I was going to do it myself. Its interesting how some tunes “fall thru the cracks”. I love Freddy’s tunes… t

Was anyone ever impressed with LANDR results?

The Who, Rush, Yes; I “get” them all. But I’m an “old” guy, maybe all my “taste” is in my mouth. THAT would be sacrilege! t

@kennywtelejazzthanks for putting up the list. I avoid most commercial sites due to the endless ads, links etcetera… t

Good question p! I “check” on cans, buds, and even the iPhone. But I still prefer “working” on the monitors. Old man, old ways die hard… t

Apologies to @bluzdogin advance, I don’t want to hijack your thread. @Jim Roseberryhow do the captures compare to Tonex? t

?'s left my comments and like over at YouTube; did you? t

All 250 of them are Jeff Beck! Not a tough decision. Beck was playing the blues with the Tridents while Clapton was dreaming of being a “Bluesman”. Jeff was laying down the Psychedelic Rock when Chas Chandler brought Hendrix to London. Jeff owned prog rock Head and shoulders above any who came before or after that is all… t

Jerry you never cease to amaze & delight me! ?'s t

? t

Agreed t

?

Mark I'm listening on some ATH-M50's (not my usual) so take this as a maybe. I'd bring the vocal and cello up (more like the solo guitar) and or the piano down in the verses. I'll try to listen again on my goto cans and get back if I think I'm off on that... Had another go with the DT-770's: Vocal up Piano down in the cello solo Love the tune. t

The C drive on my office rig “puked”, Win 10 is reinstalled, CbB and all my ToonTrack. FUG it! I went ahead and installed PM; no issues with MS Defender... t

Yep! Not your "job" Freddy! Let the "critics" handle that. Write, record and post... t

Good advice that!!

I’d go with encouraging them to rehearse it a bit more. I get that having “your guys” is way more important than “perfection”. Keep on rockin’ Barry! The material is excellent and your performances are as well. “Strock” the band, don’t lean on them. Most importantly, enjoy! t

Nothing wrong with “noodling” round the blues! t

Always a fan! ??’s t

Barry, I’ve been kind of “lurking” on this one since you put it up. I didn’t have a bunch of “issues” with the original to tell the truth. I think this says a lot about getting it “right” at the tracking stage. I realize that sometimes we have to make the “best” of what we have though. Your songwriting and performances are excellent as always. Is the final mix “better”? Yes, but it seems you “struggled” to get there. Tighten up the tracking, mix it and move on. Not trying to be “critical”, just thinking we all let the “technical” side dominate the “creative” side. It’s a “buzz” kill for me…. t almost forgot ?’s