-
Posts
1,104 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Everything posted by Soundwise
-
The plugin is properly registered yet somehow limited in functionality. Can't make it do its thing - set settings automatically. Is it just me?
-
-
Quite an eye candy this new DAW!
-
Revenge of the Sith Dirk.
-
It doesn't do anything obvious, pretty much like in some cases it's hard to tell whether a DI box really does something or it's kind of a fifth leg in the signal chain. Since I live in exile, far from home where I had mountains of gear, this plugin seems like a viable substitute for normal DI boxes, which IME help to go from good to great tonewise while recording high impedance sources like guitars and basses with traditional passive pickups.
-
Heck! I paid $30 and thought it was a good deal. ?
-
Easy! You just load the plugin, then it prompts you to drag-and-drop a patch file onto it. It's a simple file But you need to download the zip archive from Github and unzip it.
-
I had a similar experience with Ugritone in the past, so now I just steer away from them.
-
They probably are in the process of changing prices. A few minutes ago Shibalba was $10, now it's $5.
-
It's not bad bad, IMO. But if you compare size (disk space + memory footprint) vs instrument options and/or sound quality, you may start questioning the rationale behind acquiring this tank of samples. In that regard, ST3 was much better.
-
-
Came for a deal but found a new programming language.
-
Looks like Dirk Ulrich is back and determined to push his brain works up the hill.
-
I own licenses for Action Strikes and Action Strings 2. However, As per Marcellus, something is rotten in the state of Denmark (c) No wonder, Mr. Ulrich was upset with NI.
-
Looks like a small step in the right direction. I wonder if it is able to correctly detect the key for the "Flight of the Bumblebee" or "Prelude No. 1" (BWV 846).
-
Wait! Do you mean, that I also have to actually play the guitar?
-
ST AmpRoom presets sound great. However, when I run any of the included amps in isolation, it's a far cry from what a good amp sim should be like.
-
UPD. I think I know what you mean. This seems to plague AT5 when it's copied across multiple channels. When you add instances one by one - no path toggling is needed. That being said, it's worth noting, that up to five instances of AT5 take about 13% on my machine, each. However, with six or more, CPU usage rises significantly, going over 20% per instance on my machine.
-
1. Default AT5, no changes. CPU load 11-13% https://pasteboard.co/OhwIDvzQO07Z.png 2. Split path, CPU load 16-18% https://pasteboard.co/PUlH8DyPRymk.png 3. Back to the single path. CPU load 11-13% https://pasteboard.co/O2eqccEexiVa.png Am I doing something wrong?
-
I was also checking CPU usage in S1. What's the trick?
-
Looks like they have also improved performance a bit. It used to be worse than AT5 in terms of CPU power consumption, now it's noticeably better.
