John

Clearly what I said made no difference to some. Therefore I have no choice but to lock the thread. Also to abuse anybody is not permitted.

I'm with you on your points Michael.

Who are you addressing this to?

If you have an Nvidia GPU it may be installing audio drivers too. Delete or disable them.

I'm not sure why the question. But I have had no problems with Cakewalk. It works.

I don't know enough about it to have an opinion. What little I do know is it is the mixing equivalent of Ozone for tracks. I am not sure why one needs it. With Cakewalk and all the PC modules plus the linear-phase plugins give Cakewalk a lot of mastering mixing power. I picked upped Hawkeye that I like very much . If one uses Insight 2 this is in my view a better Insight.

This has gone on long enough. People have tried to bring you up to date have even gone back and provided threads from the old forum that explained what happen and how. You have every right to ask a question and get an answer. That has been done. There is no reason for this thread to go on. The one thing that to me crosses the line is personal attacks. Please refrain from getting personal with another member. I think it it time to call it a day on this thread. I wont lock it now but I will if this keeps up.

I have always given Ozone respect. It is a great tool well made and with an outstanding GUI. My favorite version was 5 but 8 advanced is growing on me.

From Wikipedia History Development In the early 1980s, there was no standardized means of synchronizing electronic musical instruments manufactured by different companies.[5] Manufacturers had their own proprietary standards to synchronize instruments, such as CV/gate and Digital Control Bus (DCB).[6] Roland founder Ikutaro Kakehashi felt the lack of standardization was limiting the growth of the electronic music industry.[6] In June 1981, he proposed developing a standard to Oberheim Electronics founder Tom Oberheim,[5] who had developed his own propriety interface, the Oberheim System.[7] Kakehashi felt the system was too cumbersome, and spoke to Sequential Circuits president Dave Smith about creating a simpler, cheaper alternative.[7] While Smith discussed the concept with American companies, Kakehashi discussed it with Japanese companies Yamaha, Korg and Kawai.[5] Representatives from all companies met to discuss the idea in October.[5] Using Roland's DCB as a basis,[6] Smith and Sequential Circuits engineer Chet Wood devised a universal synthesizer interface to allow communication between equipment from different manufacturers. Smith proposed this standard at the Audio Engineering Society show in November 1981.[2]:4 The standard was discussed and modified by representatives of Roland, Yamaha, Korg, Kawai, and Sequential Circuits.[5][8]:20 Kakehashi favored the name Universal Musical Interface (UMI), pronounced you-me,[7] but Smith felt this was "a little corny".[9] However, he liked the use of "instrument" instead of "synthesizer", and proposed the name Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI).[9][2]:4 Moog Music founder Robert Moog announced MIDI in the October 1982 issue of Keyboard.[10]:276 At the 1983 Winter NAMM Show, Smith demonstrated a MIDI connection between Prophet 600 and Roland JP-6 synthesizers. The MIDI specification was published in August 1983.[5] The MIDI standard was unveiled by Kakehashi and Smith, who received Technical Grammy Awards in 2013 for their work.[11][12][13] The first MIDI synthesizers were the Roland Jupiter-6 and the Prophet 600, both released in 1982. 1983 saw the release of the first MIDI drum machine, the Roland TR-909,[14][15] and the first MIDI sequencer, the Roland MSQ-700.[16] The first computers to support MIDI were the NEC PC-88 and PC-98 in 1982,[17] and the MSX (Yamaha CX5M)[18] released in 1983.[19]

It sounds to me like a huge deal. If you want us to look at this you need to give a little bit of info about your system. OS, Audio interface, Memory amount, CPU and GPU. The more information the better. What steps have you tried so far. Is there a time when this crashing wasn't happening?

The thread is not in compliance with being non political. Please refrain in future from posting this kind of thing.

PBS sometimes hits a home run!

It seems every time I use an assistant to DL something I often have to update the assistant before I can update the item. I think some of it is due to security. It may not have anything to do with security but I do believe they do need to know for sure who is downloading.

There is a ton of stuff on Ozone and mastering in general. I'm not going to reinvent the wheel on a forum. I have written a lot myself on the old forum on this subject. What I have seen and come to know is Ozone is a very fine plugin. Yet, it can ruin a mix very easily. Also, not everything needs Ozone or mastering. I think if the user has an notion of what they want in the sound, how they want it to sound; and from that get a mix as close to it as they can they are better off in the long run. It really doesn't matter what is used to get there. The Izotope Mastering Guide is a good place to start. In the end I said what I said because I believe it really is true and it boils down to that point.

When you type in the "control panel" it will show in Cortana as a program icon. Drag that to your desktop or pin it to your taskbar and start page. This will give you easy access.

Do you have the latest version of Bandlab assistant?

Hotel California. ?

My advice is a little Ozone goes a long way. When using it restraint is the key.

You do know that CW no longer exists. The servers are not going to have much traffic going out.

Not only do I install a platinum version but I go back to Sonar 8.5 to pick up Pantheon and a couple of others. I don't install the core program but only the plugins I want.

Another word for two way communication is feedback.

I do everything on my computers. That is the point of software. Without it a computer is a block of nothing. Add software and it can do anything you want it to do. I suppose that if you run a business centered around a computer it should be dedicated to the job for that business. Otherwise, I see no reason to limit ones self to only doing one thing and only one thing. I do video I also do photography and yes I do music. Each is done not for myself alone but others and I do a lot of documentations of events. I do DJ work too. I have laptops, desktops and tablets to help accomplish the jobs I do. When I not doing anything for anyone I will on occasion play a game or two.

You should have an audio interface for recording the sound from the deep mind 6. If you are using the internal sound chip of your computer it can exhibit the symptoms you describe.

And so have I. What I am trying to do, perhaps badly, is to tell you is I still have no idea what you are after. You have yet to make a definitive statement. Spell it out in easy to understand statements and, who knows, I might agree with you. Talking about Ableton live is no help to me. I don't have it or have used it. All I know for sure is you don't like the way keybindings work in Cakewalk and that is all I know from your postings. If you want anyone to agree with you, you need to be persuasive.

All very good points. One huge reason I leave the defaults keybndings alone is communicating with others . Those keybindings that are not bound I do bind to keys of my choice. The OP may not know that Cakewalk can import keybindings from other DAWs. There is one for Logic and one for Cubase.