Wookiee

Personally it would have to be Sonar, I see Next as an introductory DAW, possibly even competition, but with more function, with a certain fruit based computers supplied DAW.

Thank you, most kind, glad you had an enjoyable Sunday moment ?

Thanks, I suppose it does have that sense. Appreciate your taking the time to listen and comment.

Works here mix wise.

Interesting project, with interesting results.

Nicely done track mix works nicely here.

Works well here, there is something very personal about the whole song.

I suspect we all are a little Jack, mixes are definitely improving.

Yep if you saw the lyrics you might even cry, thanks for the ears and comments.

Made me smile, nice job

Sounds good here Bob, perhaps the vocal is a little stretch in the opening, ut when the band kicks in it works fine. Solid dums. Nice job

Obviously a senior manager

Pleasantly different

Enough said, mix is OK.

I could be wrong, but I believe it has something to with plugins that support GUI resizing. Some plugins, particularly old ones don't resize. Probably the man to ask would be @Ben Staton.

Not bad (I did leave an expanded comment on YouTube.)

Thanks t, strangely I can't find your comments on Soundcloud, it's say there is a comment but it is not visible to me. There are lyrics, but the DCO-106 seemed to fill that gap.

In correct much earlier when it was announced as a public BETA, in effect he breached the NDA. I am also most certainly not your dude. I have no need to lighten or lossen up, you however need to accept my opinion is not yours. I have no intention of forcing mine on you, then I ask you don't force yours on me. As you say lighten up with your unnecessary attacks. Your previous name stunt has not been forgotten.

It works in CbB but not Cakewalk Sonar, it has been reported.

@T Boog it happens in Studio as well it has been reported to both companies.

@Heath Row, again it appears that only some people are allowed to express an opinion! Other are not, is that correct. Consequently if you and him can have your opinion, does that not mean I can not? A little speed bump? His very first video on Cakewalk Sonar was not what one would call positive.

@DNnX Is this in Cakewalk Sonar or CbB?

Not criticism just an observation, if you view it as criticism that is your choice. Seems you may be quick to judge, perhaps you have not read his recent comments regarding the introduction of the Backstage pass and Cakewalk Sonar and Cakewalk Next. You are of course entitled to your opinion, but by that very assertion so am I.

@Dusk Dave I second t's suggestion, the full version allows you to normalise to a number of different streaming platforms with a simple drag and drop.

Not defending anything, just clarifying information as I understand it. But you @John Vere do like to present the negative, raise your dislikes, I don't think I have seen a truly positive post from you. It has even been suggested that you could not be what you appear. If you have been using CbB since April 2018 then you have been demoing Cakewalk Sonar for the last 6 years, if you can't see that then I can't help you. The main difference between CbB and Cakewalk Sonar is at present the method used to generate the GUI. What Cakewalk Sonar will bring when they offer it standalone we just have to wait and see. Hopefully it will offer much of what it used to offer pre it's current implementation. If you have truly been demoing 10 leading DAW's, for years it appears, why not settle on one, or two, and get on with the whole point of owning a DAW, making music yourself, with others, or helping others capture their music. Rather than spending time being critical of a company you mainly appear to dislike. I settled on Cakewalk software 32 years ago, having tried several others, before and in-between, but returning to Cakewalk because it did all I needed to make the music I enjoy.