-
Posts
549 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by GreenLight
-
[CLOSED] Cakewalk 2020.04 Early Access 1
GreenLight replied to Morten Saether's topic in Early Access Program
When working on tight deadline, I'd recommend staying away from EA's to begin with. In fact, I'd say that most studio people don't upgrade at all during deadlines... I lagged 3-4 Cakewalk releases behind during an intense period, where stability was priority #1. -
What new updates would you like to see in 2020 to Cakewalk - CLOSED.
GreenLight replied to Will.'s topic in Feedback Loop
Agreed, using Patch Points requires a few clicks, but just creating two sends from one track to two (or more!) different buses is pretty quick. No? -
What new updates would you like to see in 2020 to Cakewalk - CLOSED.
GreenLight replied to Will.'s topic in Feedback Loop
Good suggestions! Hm, I'm not sure I understand this one? You can already send a track to multiple buses or outputs using multiple Sends...? And I suppose you have explored Patch Points? -
This is how my Cakewalk behaves, I belieeeve I haven't remapped the default keybindings: 😁 When the mouse pointer hovers over the Drum PRV, then ALT + scrollwheel does nothing. When the mouse pointer hovers over the regular PRV area, ALT + scrollwheel zooms in horizontally. Pressing CTRL + LEFT/RIGHT zooms in horizontally, regardless of focus. And oh, you should probably make the thread name a bit more descriptive.
-
[CLOSED] Cakewalk 2020.04 Early Access 1
GreenLight replied to Morten Saether's topic in Early Access Program
I think you should put that disclaimer up front with every EA download link, to save you some time. -
Feature request: Copying clip envelopes should be a feature
GreenLight replied to jono grant's topic in Feedback Loop
Agreed, really good idea! 👍 I'm so used to the limitation that I don't even think about it, and most often use track automation just to be more flexible... -
[CLOSED] Cakewalk 2020.04 Early Access 1
GreenLight replied to Morten Saether's topic in Early Access Program
Hm, did I understand correctly: if you already have something bound for A, the new update will add the Arranger View to A so you have two functions on A? -
[CLOSED] Cakewalk 2020.04 Early Access 1
GreenLight replied to Morten Saether's topic in Early Access Program
@msmcleod Ah, interesting, thanks for the explanation! Good to know it's there... @winkpain Yeah, yesterday I suddenly "found" a bunch of tracks I'd hidden in my project and then forgot about it... So in lack of better memory, an indicator would be nice. 😂 (My life consists of reminders...) Sorry, ending the off-topic stuff here. 😊 -
[CLOSED] Cakewalk 2020.04 Early Access 1
GreenLight replied to Morten Saether's topic in Early Access Program
I just read your thread about it from last month, what a ruckus you had! 😱 What IS that Enhanced Keyboard Editing Mode anyway? (I read the manual but still don't really get it.) If Cakewalk had had an on/off indicator for that mode, it would have been easier for you to troubleshoot. (In fact, I believe Cakewalk needs more indicators for features that are a bit tucked away: when any track(s) are hidden, when auto preview and looping is enabled in the browser, for example.) Edit: I just checked my own bindings: I've had "Solo all selected tracks" on Num 0 for years myself... -
[CLOSED] Cakewalk 2020.04 Early Access 1
GreenLight replied to Morten Saether's topic in Early Access Program
When rearranging with Ripple Edit you have to manually handle overlaps as well... so the Arranger Track should be a quicker way to do more complex restructuring? Although it might be easier to be observant and "catch" all overlap problems if you do it as you go along while Ripple Editing... Nevertheless, as you said it'll be an amazing "play tool", and probably not just in early stages but also in later stages if some alternative ideas happen to come up. There'll be no more: "Imagine that the break here builds up and climaxes to this part over HERE instead... like THIS! *trying frenetically to click at another point in the timeline at the exact right moment, but failing as usual to demonstrate the full extent of the greatness of said idea*" 😜 -
I'm hoping you're right. To be honest, in this modern way of releasing small/incremental software updates often I've been bit by more bugs than ever before, and I'm not talking about Cakewalk here. And I also believe the constant releases encourage developing low hanging fruits in general, at least to some extent... so I am thrilled that Bandlab is creating something that takes a long time! 😁 I've been a bit worried that we've not seen any really big updates since the Bandlab phase started. Don't get me wrong, I love the updates we've been getting and am very grateful indeed, but I've started to become a bit nervous that we'd not be treated with "big new features", like stuff you see in releases such as Cubase 10. That would risk making Cakewalk dated in the long run. So again, I am thrilled that Bandlab is creating something that takes a long time! I'll gladly wait, even though I started this thread... ☺️
-
Hehe, yes I was around then as well, I've been around since Pro Audio 8.5 or so. (In fact, I invested in the lifetime updates almost exactly one year before the demise of Cakewalk Inc.! 😁) I agree with all your arguments and sincerely hope you are right. But I myself cannot claim any inside knowledge into the finances of Bandlab or rather more importantly, their priorities. As a "free side product", I do get a feeling that it might "sit looser", relatively speaking, compared to a product that actually makes the company money, but if the company is rich, then we're good. (And I did get the impression that Meng was indeed rather... solvent. ) Sorry, I did not intend to start a full scale debate about Bandlab's business model, so I'll just end it here. I'm off to re-explore the great SysEx features of Cakewalk with my almost forgotten Access Virus B! 🎹
-
Cakewalk By Bandlabs for Apple MacOs
GreenLight replied to Salomão Borges Vitorino's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
English: A few years ago, Cakewalk tried to create a Sonar version for Mac OS, but it was ultimately cancelled. Please see (and translate) the discussion below for more details. Google translated into Portuguese: Alguns anos atrás, o Cakewalk tentou criar uma versão do Sonar para o Mac OS, mas acabou sendo cancelada. Por favor, veja (e traduza) a discussão abaixo para mais detalhes. http://forum.cakewalk.com/The-SONAR-Mac-Prototype-a-collaboration-between-Cakewalk-and-CodeWeavers-m3593807.aspx -
Great tip, thanks! I already use X-Mouse Button Control, but hadn't thought of actually mapping keys to Cakewalk specifically. Brilliant!
-
Considering the recent relative silence from Bandlab, I just wanna double-check that development of my favorite DAW is still ongoing? (If it was a paid product I wouldn't worry as much, but the future of a free product just seems a little less certain, that's all.) Stay safe and keep on truckin' everyone! 🚚😎
-
I searched and found the thread below. Maybe some of the answers might help? Good luck!
-
Feature Request: Native Instruments NKS Support Please
GreenLight replied to JonnyS's topic in Feedback Loop
Well, NKS integration seems to be a popular request, so who knows... -
Capture recording - Best recording option ever
GreenLight replied to Sonarman's topic in Feedback Loop
Agreed, this is a brilliant feature in Live and Logic that would be great to have in Cakewalk as well! Check out how it works in Live (I've linked to about 1:23 where the interesting bits start): -
Is BUS AUTOMATION supposed to be latency compensated in CbB
GreenLight replied to Gill20's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
...but I'm not sure I agree with Shane McFee's analysis that Cakewalk's popularity is dwindling... judged by this forum at least, there seems to be a lot of new users around, which is great! -
Is BUS AUTOMATION supposed to be latency compensated in CbB
GreenLight replied to Gill20's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
What version of CbB are you using? I've actually stayed at 2019.09 so far, as the later releases introduced a lot of buffer changes that seemed to caused a lot of stir. Maybe they're solved ny now, but I'm in an important phase and can't have disturbances. Sorry if this is obvious, but as you mention "buzzing" and distortion in a heavy project: have you tried different (= larger) ASIO buffer sizes? In another thread recently, someone was complaining about latency but used plugins that absolutely required big buffers to work properly, like Output's Kontakt stuff etc. Edit: Thanks for the tip about True Dynamics by Kazrog, will check it out. Seems they adore it at Gearslutz. -
Is BUS AUTOMATION supposed to be latency compensated in CbB
GreenLight replied to Gill20's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
Hm, weird, I have not had problems with the timing of bus automation, I have been automating many bus volume levels and bus effect parameters during the years. Also to create cool effects & cuts. Are there any specific plugins that cause issues?