Milton Sica

Thank you very much for the information, but unfortunately this does not happen with Acoustica. See that I did the procedures that you perform in your editing program 3 times. As you can see, I have 3 instances of Acoustica running.

I noticed that with each Acoustica call through the Utilities Menu, Cakewalk makes a call to the program, that is: it always opens it as if it were the first time. If I have to work with "n" clips in Acoustica I realized that, apart from my lack of knowledge on how to do it, it will be open in "n" instances of the application itself. The question is: Is there a way to: 1) Open a clip in an instance of Acoustica. 2) Make edits to the wav. 3) Update the edited clip in Cakewalk. 4) Close wav editing. 5) Keep Acoustica running 6) Edit another wav in the same Acoustica instance opened first, without having to open another instance each time you edit it?

Yes, it's a large detail and a great tip. Thanks !

It worked fine when I opened the app via utilities. However, when I cut a clip in a track, instead of it opening only the marked clip, contrary to what sound forge receives, it opened the entire wav of the track. How to make it work in the same way as Sound Forge, that is: allowing the edition and return to Cakewalk only of the selected clip? In Cakewalk In Acoustica

Great. Thats work very well.Thanks !

Very good ! Could you tell here the step by step to include the program as a utility? I know there is a post about this, but I couldn't find it. Thanks

Thanks Oh yes, by hotkeys linked to RUN SCRIPT CAL. My first understanding is that it would be possible to EXECUTE A SCRIPT CAL from MIDI events, as a form of TRIGGER. Something more AUTOMATIC than the user PRESSING KEYS for execution. Example: Sometimes MIDI notes may be duplicated. I have a CAL script that CLEANS DUPLICATE NOTES. So I figured this script could run automatically whenever I duplicated a note.

I did not know that. Can you elaborate more on how to do this "trigger".

Something like the mastering plugins that use references like TR5 Master Match, that is, capturing and treating my knowledge base and proposing improvements based on them. When I created the topic, I focused on using AI for better DAW operation, such as increasing productivity beyond hotkeys, improving CAL codes, improving theme editing, etc.

This happens in some of my projects. The recorded MIDI simply stops playing. I can often overcome the problem by reinserting the same plugin and copying the data and configs to it. In other cases, even doing this the problem is not fixed. Yes, usually in projects generated and written in previous versions.

I bring two suggestions for improvement. 1) The first is that, after closing the export box, the COMPLETION marks of the tasks are removed, as they remain marked that way when opening it again, which is confusing its execution at the time I commanded it or that a message of TOOLTIP when hovering over the mouse, informing date and time of completion of the execution. 2) The second is that it is also possible to visualize a horizontal line, such as the vertical one that already exists, when moving the mouse in PLAY time of the project.

Great, great !

Personally, I think the assessments are taking different directions. One that addresses musical creativity. Another one that questions philosophical approaches and many others regarding the use of AI in the application. For my part I thought of more direct cases like: 1) Evaluate my mix and propose a better one considering my settings. 2) Generate suggestions for mixing improvement; mastering in this project considering an 80's rock mastering model And so on.

Thank you very much for the approach you brought. That's it.

Is this. Great !

Personal, important, certainly, all the manifestations brought up to now, but, when I created the post of suggestion of implementation, I didn't think to enter in controversies, nor debates on political/social/idealist issues. I thought precisely of bringing up the possibility of inserting AI-based tools that allow the execution of different tasks. I think that, if we enter into this approach, we would have to critically focus on the first ones who recorded messages on stones, those who recorded them on k7 tapes, etc. Today we have several features that implement AI rudiments such as hotkeys, cal scripts, keyboard macros applications. It was with this approach that I inserted the suggestion.

Many applications are implementing the use of the ChatGPT API in their functionality. I suggest that the same can be implemented in Cakewalk where many things could be requested and implemented by the application, such as: 1) Analyze performance improvement to be implemented in this project. 2) Adjust the configuration parameters that best suit the user's machine. And so on.

Any predictions for this release? Will there be an Early Access time?

@msmcleod Just as it is possible to show/not show, front/back of the track the vertical lines, I suggest that the same be implemented for horizontal lines, as seen in the image (white lines).

Yes. I will post there. I asked the question here, because I thought it could be something that was showing me in the documentation or even something related to the topic I'm using. In fact, there is no such functionality.

Thanks for the information, but if you look at the image, this sampling is already visible. What I need is to be able to visualize a horizontal line for each Db mark. @msmcleod Is what I'm suggesting very difficult to implement in some future version?

It is possible to show the vertical lines according to the chosen time visualization type. The question is: Is there a way to show horizontal lines according to the chosen volume visualization type? In the example of the image, I placed the horizontal lines that I would like to be able to visualize in white. This way of showing could be along the same lines as the vertical lines: ahead or behind the wave.

Very good job ! As I had already discussed. For the use of keyboard macros like this, there are several interdependencies that I think require a lot of individual effort to make the whole process, especially the "environment preparation" so that the program runs smoothly. I still think it would be a great evolution for the tool if it added more power to the CAL scripts for direct manipulation of all DAW objects, just like EXTRA IBM does.

Very good what you are doing. Most of the problems to be addressed for the perfect performance of some tasks in programs like this is that you have to do a lot of preparation of the screen that will be manipulated, because if the application itself does not have a number of SHORTCUT KEYS that can facilitate this. For years I worked as a developer in a financial institution in Brazil where I developed many keyboard macros, because the application that made the "emulation" of the IBM Terminal (EXTRA) has a very powerful language for that.