Jump to content

Astraios

Members
  • Posts

    505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Astraios

  1. ...here's another way to work around with Multi- ?. Set me a hotkey for roll-in/ roll-out in "Actual Title Buttons" and here we go… but no chance toggling the synths --> by shortcuts , even if Multidog is highlighted, hmmm? Multidog in Consolee.mp4
  2. Hi David, Thank you for your answer. Okay, i'll send a picture of my console circumstance. I only can minimize the multidock using Windows 10 shortcut --> Win+Down. Can't bring it up again with my dedicated shortcut (in Track Pane View, no prob with that) Also it's not possible to switch through the Register Synths (back or forth with the appropriate shortcuts ) like I can do in Trackpane View. these four symbols at the top of my multidog ?? belong to "Actual Title Buttons" software, which doesn't bother the functionality not at all... so when I disable the software it's the same
  3. Yeah, sorry "Console View" is what I meant...
  4. Thx for return, Michael ? Maybe this foto can help understand my item
  5. Hi there, I always wonder why (shortcut) "Multidock on/off" doesn't work in mixer mode, even this option is shown under global shortcuts (in editor)? Often it would be handy to use multidock in mixer mode. Also toggle "next/previous register" doesn't seem to work when multidock is active in mixer mode. Can somebody confirm this? greetings from Berlin
  6. Hi there ? Show/hide Clip Properties Inspector --> SHIFT+I Show/hide Track Properties Inspector --> CTRL+SHIFT+I I wonder about both commands don't show up in the search: --> function (list) of the shortcut editor? Also some other commands only show up in --> 'Assigned to:' textfield and so they aren't assignable to other combinations like the most other shortcuts. Is this wanted and if yes, why it it that way? nice regards
  7. Ha ha, sarcasm is the way you're dealing...? Good Job done, Buddy ?️‍♂️
  8. you're right guy - I'm such an idiot ? thx for reminding...
  9. ... take a look in my profile, this should answer some ....
  10. ... and what about your SPACE-Key? Don't you use it? ?
  11. "I agree the OP needs to make specific recommendations for changes he would like to see" great judgement… ? (you are the ONE, who knows… (everything)
  12. ...as you said, you never fumbled much around with this stuff, right? Try to get deeper and you will see what happens...
  13. belief me, my friend, as in the old sowjetunion socialism wasn't to discuss, keybinding and shortcut themes aren't to discus with cakewalk Leaders ?
  14. ... please, take a look at my profile - this might answer a few questions...
  15. Hi and Hello again, I still want to remember and criticize Cakewalks low level 'Keyboard Binding' solution. Had found an article: "30 days with Cakewalk - Part 1: AlmostEverything "https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/music/2018/12/22/Cakewalk-Part-1-Almost-Everything.html There you will find a detailed explanation about what is going wrong... to read there... -TERRIBLE default bindings - The default bindings are some sort of next level trash. A number of useful functions are unbound, and useful functions (like tools) are bound to overlapping keys. -Multiple Layers - You cant search just everything. You need to know if your binding is global, console, event list, step sequencer, etc… etc… You’re left to browsing 18 sub-layers of shortcuts by hand. -Slow - the keyboard shortcuts window is slow to load, slow to bind/unbind and slow to switch “areas”. -Corruption - I’ve had my shortcuts corrupted once, that’s more times than I ever want it to happen. I’ve never had this happen in any other software. I’ve lost bindings due to my own idiocy, but never had bindings corrupted on save. The Keyboard Shortcuts window is a necessary feature that’s only half-done." For me, taking lanes or workspace-philosophy isn't that much the hype, I rather prefer optimation on things I really need. Thx for reading ? With nice regards from Berlin 30 days with Cakewalk - Part 1_.pdf
  16. Hi Folks - what do you think About that? I thought about combining StepRec + Virtual Controller to one? If the steprecord functions are integrated into the virtual Keyboard generation of new notes in PRV would be very easy and efficient. Hitting the pc-keynumbers 1-0 for stepsize notes and other keys for: - move the insertion point to the increment - click here to move the insertion point to a beat - click here to move the insertion point to a clock All the best Astraios
  17. Hi Cakewalk Team BTW, why don't you combine StepRec + Virtual Controller? If the steprecord functions are integrated into the virtual Keyboard generation of new note in PRV would be very easy. Hitting the keynumbers for notes and other keys for: - move the insertion point to the increment - click here to move the insertion point to a beat - click here to move the insertion point to a clock All the best Astraios
  18. he he - it was almost a one shot Realisation ?‍♂️
  19. Yeah - now I can finally disable this this f***ing comp!!! Great deal ?
  20. Okay, now I made it - but shouldn't it look like this?
×
×
  • Create New...