Milton Sica

I was able to download and install a version of Midi Controller Pro on Ipad 2. If it wasn't abusing your friend's time and help, could you give me a sequence of steps to do to connect to Cakewalk? Is it via RTPMidi?

Thank you very much. I will try to download. I found a way to download versions compatible with the iPad 2, with this version using an old version of Itunes that allows you to select APPs, click on GET and then on the iPad 2 try to use them.

I "inherited" my old Ipad from my wife and would like to start using it as a controller/table, midi device. I would like to count on the help of friends to indicate which apps would still be compatible with this version of the iPad. I already use TouchDown on my cell phone.

Andres, thank you very much for bringing up my doubts in your reply as well. This answer of yours gave me another doubt when I went to operate. Why on some tracks the option that the color of the track follows the color of the BUS does not appear?

Thanks. Yes, this is my doubt !

Sorry, maybe I didn't make myself clear. I know that it is possible to modify several ways of visualization, using themes and its editor. However what I asked is, if I can do some theme update in an existing project. Something like: 1) In a project I have a track with the name GUITARRA. 2) Right click and there would be some options: a) import theme, b) import theme from current track, etc..... 3) The DAW would change the theme, according to the currently used theme model, replacing the visualization of the GUITARRA track with the existing one. I don't know if I made myself explain. I hope so. Big hug from Brazil.

Is there any way to change the colors of tracks and buses other than importing tracks according to a track template and then migrating everything (plugins, etc) to the new tracks with the colors I would like to have now. It would be something like importing Theme Template. If, on import, the program recognizes a track with the same name as the imported model about changing its color/visualization characteristics.

@msmcleod This doubt came to me the other day when listening to an old project with headphones where I noticed that the Bass was much more present in one of the stereo channels. In my projects I use Bass in two tracks. In one of them I insert a treble cut equalization, in the other a bass cut equalization. So, according to my work format, I can better manage my bass mix. I use BASS MODE. Upon returning to the project I noticed that the bass input on both tracks was only receiving the left input from the Bass Mode. The PAN of each track was centered. As I was emphatically listening to the bass with more volume on the same original channel sent by MODO BASS, a doubt arose in my mind: Even though the track's PAN is centered, the passage to the Master/Bus still preserves the origin ? I wonder why when configuring the input of each track to the stereo of MODO BASS the problem was solved, that is, I started to hear the bass centered in the headphones (both sides). I don't know if this could be happening only with MODO BASS or also with other instruments.

Thank you very much for the information, but unfortunately this does not happen with Acoustica. See that I did the procedures that you perform in your editing program 3 times. As you can see, I have 3 instances of Acoustica running.

I noticed that with each Acoustica call through the Utilities Menu, Cakewalk makes a call to the program, that is: it always opens it as if it were the first time. If I have to work with "n" clips in Acoustica I realized that, apart from my lack of knowledge on how to do it, it will be open in "n" instances of the application itself. The question is: Is there a way to: 1) Open a clip in an instance of Acoustica. 2) Make edits to the wav. 3) Update the edited clip in Cakewalk. 4) Close wav editing. 5) Keep Acoustica running 6) Edit another wav in the same Acoustica instance opened first, without having to open another instance each time you edit it?

Yes, it's a large detail and a great tip. Thanks !

It worked fine when I opened the app via utilities. However, when I cut a clip in a track, instead of it opening only the marked clip, contrary to what sound forge receives, it opened the entire wav of the track. How to make it work in the same way as Sound Forge, that is: allowing the edition and return to Cakewalk only of the selected clip? In Cakewalk In Acoustica

Great. Thats work very well.Thanks !

Very good ! Could you tell here the step by step to include the program as a utility? I know there is a post about this, but I couldn't find it. Thanks

Thanks Oh yes, by hotkeys linked to RUN SCRIPT CAL. My first understanding is that it would be possible to EXECUTE A SCRIPT CAL from MIDI events, as a form of TRIGGER. Something more AUTOMATIC than the user PRESSING KEYS for execution. Example: Sometimes MIDI notes may be duplicated. I have a CAL script that CLEANS DUPLICATE NOTES. So I figured this script could run automatically whenever I duplicated a note.

I did not know that. Can you elaborate more on how to do this "trigger".

Something like the mastering plugins that use references like TR5 Master Match, that is, capturing and treating my knowledge base and proposing improvements based on them. When I created the topic, I focused on using AI for better DAW operation, such as increasing productivity beyond hotkeys, improving CAL codes, improving theme editing, etc.

This happens in some of my projects. The recorded MIDI simply stops playing. I can often overcome the problem by reinserting the same plugin and copying the data and configs to it. In other cases, even doing this the problem is not fixed. Yes, usually in projects generated and written in previous versions.

I bring two suggestions for improvement. 1) The first is that, after closing the export box, the COMPLETION marks of the tasks are removed, as they remain marked that way when opening it again, which is confusing its execution at the time I commanded it or that a message of TOOLTIP when hovering over the mouse, informing date and time of completion of the execution. 2) The second is that it is also possible to visualize a horizontal line, such as the vertical one that already exists, when moving the mouse in PLAY time of the project.

Great, great !

Personally, I think the assessments are taking different directions. One that addresses musical creativity. Another one that questions philosophical approaches and many others regarding the use of AI in the application. For my part I thought of more direct cases like: 1) Evaluate my mix and propose a better one considering my settings. 2) Generate suggestions for mixing improvement; mastering in this project considering an 80's rock mastering model And so on.

Thank you very much for the approach you brought. That's it.

Is this. Great !

Personal, important, certainly, all the manifestations brought up to now, but, when I created the post of suggestion of implementation, I didn't think to enter in controversies, nor debates on political/social/idealist issues. I thought precisely of bringing up the possibility of inserting AI-based tools that allow the execution of different tasks. I think that, if we enter into this approach, we would have to critically focus on the first ones who recorded messages on stones, those who recorded them on k7 tapes, etc. Today we have several features that implement AI rudiments such as hotkeys, cal scripts, keyboard macros applications. It was with this approach that I inserted the suggestion.