Milton Sica

Thank you very much. In order to improve more knowledge and improve the production of my own songs, I am going through old projects. Coming up against my own ignorance when I started the journey and envisioning improvements I could put into my future creation flow. Most of the projects I've been working on are already on social media and, when I listen to them, I actually see myself in so many things I've learned since then. In this case, I thought I could use the EFFECT PRESETS model, too, instead of referring to SEND one by one. For example: Send to a COMPRESSOR, then to the NEUTRON UNMASK and so on.

Yes. I thought about that too, but not whether there would be any loss or type of problem in the treatment of what you receive and send. Not to mention monitoring issues. What do you think ?

The use of chains of effects has been a very productive way of working. A little while ago, after having the need to make several SENDs, I reflected that, if that were the case, I could also create SENDS Chains to, in a single insertion, send them to several paths. An example of use that would have to send: UNMASK plugin on the Guitar bus UNMASK plugin on the keyboard bus MCOMPRESSOR plugin on the drum kick bus. The question is: Is there a way to create a CHAIN OF SENDS?

I posted in the main topic that I started to face problems with normalization when performed on multiple selected tracks. I already reproduced the error in several projects. I gave up normalizing that way.

Just read the release approaches.

Good thing we're not talking about cars. I don't know one person in the whole world who would buy an automobile knowing it has a known amount of defects/bugs. That's what I'm talking about. If it were a car, would you buy it and put your life/family in it? And I close my posts on the topic.

New SONAR ???? Older users, we are sure that this is not a NEW SONAR, but an application that has enjoyed all these years when it was sold as free and had the collaboration of the entire user community. What comes around, and I'm testing the early access version, is an attempt to sell something said to be new, but "current" as we know it to be.

Because I think it's a huge mistake in the company's strategy to go for a free-pay movement and an application that, we know, has numerous bugs. The question is quite simple and direct: who will pay for a tire that, at any moment, will present a puncture ???? The least one would expect is that the application delivers everything it promises without errors. You're talking about a "banana" as if nobody knows what's inside the skin. Excuse me, but your corporatism adds nothing to what we, users, want. If we're going to pay for the "banana" we want to know everything inside and how it works.

Because I think it's a huge mistake in the company's strategy to go for a free-pay movement and an application that, we know, has numerous bugs. The question is quite simple and direct: who will pay for a tire that, at any moment, will present a puncture ???? The least one would expect is that the application delivers everything it promises without errors. While it was presented as FREE, we users noticed some bugs, but I don't know of any that pay any dollar to receive errors.

Neutron Visual Mixer. 1 - Insert as many STEREE BUSes as there are in your production line (VOICE, VOCALS, FEMALE VOCALS, DRUMS, GUITARS, GUITARS, KEYBOARDS, PERCUSSIONS, ETC.) 2 - Insert the RELAY plugin in each of these BUSes. 3 - Insert the NEUTRON VISUAL MIXER plugin in the MASTER. From there, all you have to do is distribute the elements according to your taste. I think this saves a lot of academic approaches on the subject that you can return to in the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvZe9R1UOt0&pp=ugMICgJwdBABGAHKBSBjb21vIHVzYXIgbyBORVVUUk9OIFZJU1VBTCBNSVhFUg%3D%3D

Hello, Thanks for the help. I've been using this theme and applying some improvements to my way of using it. I was trying to change the color of the Check Box marked in the image, because, when marking, it did not show the check. When trying to edit it gave the error and I discovered that the problem is that I installed Windows 12 and the path of Paint changed. Corrected the path and went back to editing. In the version that had the CHECK BOX when checking (a blue one) it did not show on the screen. I changed it to red as seen in the image and now it appears.

When trying to open a BMP to edit the image in a theme I am getting error message.

Hey guys. I don't know if this is the issue group to post this topic. I will be in Austin/TX between the 25th and 9/29/2023. It would be really positive if you could meet with a Cakewalk partner who lives in the city to exchange experiences and everything else related to music production. If any of the friends are available during the period, kindly call me in private. Hug.

Don't work.

I got a little closer to what I would like to do. 1 - Insert midi clips. 2 - In each of them I changed the tuning. That worked. I couldn't access your links about inserting pitch markers. Which is exactly what I want to do. Creating melodic bass lines, etc.

I want to take the samples from the basslines and change the bars to the notes/chords I want. In ACID I did a lot of that, but it was with wav samples. With MIDI sequences I don't know how to do it.

Thanks for the answer. I will try to be more clear. I want to know if it's possible to do something like the image, that is: change the sequence of the midis notes for the chords. C - F - G - C Note that the midis notes remain at their original values.

I've always been interested in inserting samples of standard instruments into a MIDI track and being able to change the tonalities. Something like C - G - F - C . I was able to do a lot of things by positioning each sample within the MIDI grid on the desired note. With the evolution of the application, I think there could be a more modern way of doing it. Something in JOINTS. If anyone can help me thanks. My wish is quite simple: Include or midi samples and be able to change to a desired chord sequence.

I believe the answer to my question lies in the correction brought by the latest version of the plugin.

I use the free MT POWERDRUMKIT 2 plugin in my productions, separating each piece of drums into a specific channel that receives the stereo from the plugin for each piece. I've noticed that the SIDE-STICK sometimes ends up sounding like the MIDI note is doubled, popping/clipping, sometimes even reverberating. My question is if this is a known plugin issue or something you can fix either in the plugin settings or with a plugin on his channel. Details: the project is completely flat, that is, there is no plugin or any other treatment in the channel or master. Any suggestion ?

I think most of us still don't realize that the relationship has completely changed. When the programs are free/free, what is created is a participatory, collaborative community, where everyone seeks the same end, which is the constant improvement of the program. The company, unilaterally, which is its full right, will change this relationship. It's kind of like a marriage where the couple owns a joint business and one of them files for divorce but wants to keep the business. The relationship changes completely. It is no longer partnership/collaboration, but consumption with completely different relationship rules where even that affectionate codename (BAKERS) no longer makes sense.

I think most of us still don't realize that the relationship has completely changed. When the programs are free/free, what is created is a participatory, collaborative community, where everyone seeks the same end, which is the constant improvement of the program. The company, unilaterally, which is its full right, will change this relationship. It's kind of like a marriage where the couple owns a joint business and one of them files for divorce but wants to keep the business. The relationship changes completely. It is no longer partnership/collaboration, but consumption with completely different relationship rules where even that affectionate codename (BAKERS) no longer makes sense.

There's so much talk about those pixels that I was remembering someone's comment on the forum that DAW is for music creation. Unless I have missed something and have to learn to use PHOTOSHOP , COREL DRAW .....

I have a proposal to make to friends of the community, considering that, apparently, at least not until now, registration and participation in the forum will still not be charged. Therefore, I think we should leave this post aside and create a topic where we, users, could actually help each other. The topic I propose is that it be an evaluative approach of all DAWs available on the market, considering prices, features, etc. In my case, I live in Brazil to buy $1 dollar I pay R$5 reais, 1 Euro pays R$6 reais, 1 pound pays 6.50 pounds. When DAW was free this financial reality did not exist. Now yes ! Which, of course, must have been included in the world-scene assessments of its use.