Starship Krupa

My recommendation is to figure out what's causing your instruments to glitch. The system specs you indicate are surely capable. Have you excluded your sample and plug-in folders from Defender's realtime scanning? Have you tried running Resource Monitor to see what's going on in the background when you use those instruments?

It functions, but only gets me half of what I want. The toggle keys open the pane, but then once they're open, if you hit them again all they do is collapse them. True, I don't usually completely banish either of those panes, but I do banish Synth Rack and Help. It's about screen real estate. When I'm on my 14" screen'd laptop, every pixel counts. Yes, I could use screensets, but those take extra time to apply and they pop the view back to whatever it was when the screenset was saved. I just want a one-click way to make any of them vanish completely. Adding Close to the Docking Options menu seems like the simplest, although a keystrokable command would also be handy.

A|A|S should offer people a free NFR license once they've acquired all of the soundpacks for a given instrument. Only half kidding.

Count off the number of people involved in creating Hysteria. You're one guy trying to emulate the work of an army of professionals and consultants. Metal is a very highly produced and engineered genre, was from the start. I suggest watching Some Kind Of Monster, or if you've already seen it, maybe watch it again. Proof that legends consider packing it in. From what I understand, the album that came out of their process is also proof that legends can produce clinkers.

I have a Logitech Marathon Mouse M705, which has 4 buttons plus wheel. Pushing the wheel left and right scrolls horizontally. I have the 2 extra buttons on the left side programmed for Ctrl and Alt, which makes for some mighty fine single-handed mouse-only operation. Any reputable 4-button mouse should be able to get you there, using app-specific button assignments.

On a system that has never had Cakewalk by BandLab installed, run the web installer (not BandLab Assistant). On a fresh system, the web installer should download a full executable installer. Copy it to the target systems.

Well, "recording" or maybe in your case "mix engineering" is only once facet of making music, and plenty of the time, I'm using parts of my brain that have little to do with playing. I do see it much like learning another instrument. Not everyone is going to enjoy or excel at every instrument they pick up. You tried "mix engineering" and got fed up with it. It sounds like you gave it a hell of a shot. There are countless musicians who never record themselves, have no idea about DAW's or whatever. I have multiple musician friends, but few I can talk mix engineering with. To them, it's drudgery or geek stuff or whatever. They like to play, sing, make up songs. Recording them is a complicated chore like doing taxes. I think throughout this thread, some of us, at least me, weren't 100% clear on what you meant by "call it a day." On making a career of it? On playing entirely? Now I get that what you were pondering was whether you should keep trying to hone your mix engineering skills. I'm glad it wasn't about making music entirely. So my answer is "screw it." It sounds like it was dragging you down. Do the parts of making music that bring you happiness. If you write songs, you've acquired enough skills (and equipment) to record demos of them. There are TONS of musicians who stop there or don't even attempt to go that far. I answer questions on this forum all the time from people who "just want to record my guitar and vocals." Also, when I started recording myself, it exposed areas of my playing that needed work (sometimes brutally!). It helped motivate me to become a better player (or at least more consistent). So if that's the case with you, your time and effort and money isn't something that wasn't wasted. I don't see where anyone was poking fun at you, it seems more that we can all relate (oh the nights I go to bed convinced that I suck eternally and irredeemably and who do I think I am, at age 61 trying to do the kind of music I do, yada yada), and take it with a wry sense of humor. And I thank you for starting a discussion that helped remind me what I want out of recording and mixing songs.

Thank you. This is what I meant by where does Cakewalk store user presets. I gave it a 99% chance that you'd be the one with the 411. I wouldn't have checked "ActiveMovie." ? I'll guess that if I want to transfer these presets to my second and third systems, I can export the keys from the main one and import them to the others?

I've done some spelunking around C:\Users\krupa\AppData\Roaming\Cakewalk\Shared Presets and found where Cakewalk seems to be storing user presets for VSTi's, but not, for some reason, the same for FX. They must be kept somewhere, but where?

I have found this to be true as well, to the point where I don't use it anymore. I do hear a difference when activating 2X plug-in upsampling, which is a different deal, but not with 64-bit double precision. All the 64-bit thing has done for me is make certain instruments and FX get weird when they're trying to sync to the project tempo. And not weird in a cool, useful way, just doing the wrong multiple or beat division. Since I use tempo-sync'd instruments and FX on everything, I leave it off. Here's a discussion amongst the Cakewalk cave people about it. Note that Craig Anderton, Voice of No Small Authority kinda brushes it off: http://forum.cakewalk.com/Question-regarding-FX-plugins-using-64bit-doubleprecision-m3636118.aspx

What I mean is that whatever track you have the compressor on, you can filter the sidechain signal going into it all you want (freebie MCompressor has this built-in), but when the compressor is triggered, it affects the entire track, not just the bass. I tend to use basses with a lot of triangle-wavy oscillator sync'd goodness in the lower (and even upper) mids. If I just do a simple sidechain on it with the trigger signal coming from the kick, yeah, works fine, but it ducks my entire bass track, funky blurpiness and all. When mostly it doesn't need to unless I'm trying for a Daft Punk effect. I just want the low end of the bass to get out of the way, not duck the entire spectrum. The two plug-ins I know that can handle sidechain ducking of only a specific frequency range are Trackspacer (get it from Pluginboutique when it periodically goes on sale for $29), and MSpectralDynamics, which I also have but haven't entirely gotten a handle on.

I've tried a few, and I've also set up my own mastering stack, with a bus compressor, mid-side EQ, and limiter. Right now I am really digging Brainworx' bx_Masterdesk, which is available right now as a freebie from Plugin Alliance. Before that I had the lite version, Masterdesk Classic, and liked it. It's just a collection of all the usual tools you'd have in a mastering chain: EQ, compressor, limiter, stereo controller. Classic is fine, but the pro version gives you more control. Since I have so many excellent bus-friendly FX, I vacillate between using the Swiss Army knife tools and individual ones like Shadow Hills Mastering Compressor, elysia alpha compressor, Millenia NSEQ, Lindell TE-100, etc. Meldaproduction MLimiterX is my current fave limiter, but Sonic Anomaly Unlimited is also excellent. With Brainworx stuff, always be sure to remember that you can load factory presets from the "VST3" menu in the Cakewalk plug-in UI.

I know you already sorted this, but for the sake of lurkers, no, you shouldn't need to register any audio interface before using it. Download whatever drivers from their website and go. And Macs do have USB, so that Scarlett could be plugged straight into her computer, which is the way I would do it. Since the 2i2 is "class compliant," you can plug it into either a Windows or a Mac system and it will work without special drivers, but of course you always want to use Focusrite's ASIO for production work. I always plug audio interfaces straight into the computer if at all possible, and if at all possible, not even have them share the internal bus.

It only made sense after I gave it some thought. One way of looking at a compressor is that it takes something away to bring out something else. It can help make a track "pop" and it can also push it back a bit. So if my compressor setting was knocking off the attack (I don't remember at the moment what the settings were), it would leave space in the mix for the bass track's attacks and then go back to sitting on top of the bass track. Or the other way around, the arp might have been stomping the bass track's attacks and letting the sustain bloom. It's like EQ carving; dipping some frequencies out of the piano track to let the guitar track come through (something else I stumbled upon by accident and finally understood). Well, that's a challenge, trying to figure out just what I did to get that result. ?It was serendipitous, to be sure, I was just turning knobs to see what I would get. A "mix with my ears, not my eyes or brain" moment. One issue with sidechaining is that it can be a "blunt instrument." Even if I filter the sidechain input, it still ducks the entire full spectrum of the target track. Here is where I sing the praises of Trackspacer, but I still think that I wouldn't have gotten the same results with Trackspacer without maybe opening the panel and messing about with the attack and release. Moreover, it was a good lesson and reminder that every single element of a mix affects the other elements.

Do you know that you can drag the controls in the Track Header around to re-order them? I have it set up so that when minimized, my favorite controls are visible.

Double the number of controls and make them all assignable would be my (similar) suggestion. Of all the standard MIDI parameters, Chorus and Reverb seem like some of the least useful. (Of course if the A|A|S Player obeyed Reverb messages, that would make it one of the most useful....if if if)

What I would really prefer is if the shorcut keys were 2-way, that is hitting "B" once opens the Browser, hitting it again makes it go away entirely, that sort of thing. But I don't think that would be a popular suggestion.

I didn't notice that I had this little bugger running all the time until I was tweaking my GPU and the tweaking software offered to kill some services that it deemed unnecessary. Well whaddaya know? Who did it find running in the background a few reboots after the last time I ran Softube's installer shell? This kind of thing coming from software companies has ever annoyed me no end. If it's an "installation helper," then why in the hell does it want to be running all the time rather than during an installation? I have exactly 3 Softube FX, only one of which I ever actually use. Unlike everyone else on the market (with the exception of Waves, who have a service that serves up part of the UI's), they need an extra, always running service to unpack and copy a DLL to a specific location? And they think nobody is going to notice this or care on their highly optimized DAW computers? When I see stuff like this, and I'll include installers that still put a shortcut on the desktop whether you ask for one or not, I immediately think that the company in question has a hubris problem. "Our software is sooooo important that we can have a sentry service standing by at all times waiting for the user to run our installer (which, unlike everyone else's installers, apparently needs to have a service running to work properly)!" Also, thanks to Apple, whenever I see something that calls itself a "Helper" service it especially makes me want to punch it. "I don't NEED your help! I don't plug any Apple Mobile Devices into this computer! I check for Softube updates maybe once a year! Go away!"

I've got such a long way to go before I'd want to use this.

One for each question is best, and there are other subforums for discussing recording techniques, hardware, etc. if you think that maybe a given question would fit better over there. But here in "Q&A" is fine. My best advice is to take things slowly and bite off one at a time. Start with "record some audio and play it back," then go on to the next thing you want to learn how to do, maybe "overdub another track while listening to the first one," then "use some plug-in FX," then "mix my tracks down to one stereo track" and go from there. People will be able to give you advice at every one of those steps if you run into any trouble. Another suggestion: if you can figure out how to edit your forum signature, put your system specs in it like I have. At least computer type and interface type. That saves would-be helpful people a certain amount of wondering and rounds of questions and answers.

As it stands, if I open a pane for the first time it will open docked, which is as it should be. However, to make it go away entirely, I have to undock it and click on the "X" to banish it completely. I'm pressed for real estate on my 14" laptop, so I do a lot of view/pane management. It's mostly an issue with Synth Rack, which I don't open very often and don't need to have open or available all the time. My feature request is to add a "close" entry to the Docking Options button, which will close the pane entirely (whether it's docked or undocked). As follows:

I get how frustrating it got for people to ask over and over for these "smaller," convenience features and in turn get "big" features that it seemed like nobody was asking for. Matrix View comes to mind. Not that I haven't had fun with Matrix View, but I can imagine that if I had been waiting forever for a ripple edit indicator and a huge feature like that showed up, with no attention paid to the endless requests, I would have wanted to scream. But for 4 years now, there's been a new sheriff in town.

You mean nested folders? Cakewalk got that feature a couple of revs ago.

And yet another of the endless examples of Meldaproduction FX having crazy deep features to discover. And it's part of the FreeFX Bundle! I've only messed about with it to see how it worked. I think I only tried it in mono, but since MTuner is polyphonic, I wondered whether the polyphony is available on the MIDI out. @Milton Sica, is there a reason you're using v. 14.2 instead of the current release, v. 15.2? 15 was a pretty big update, with the addition of the "user-friendly" device UI's along with the usual optimizations and feature extensions.

I've seen this too, latest build.