Jump to content

Will.

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,325

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Will.

  1. Will.
    For easy access to the Loop explorer which is now called Browser, just hit "B" on your keyboard and a window pane on the right side of the screen will pop open. Choose the browser folder TOP LEFT of the pane window and locate your dedicated external sample/loop folder. 12.mp4
  2. Will.
    For easy access to the Loop explorer which is now called Browser, just hit "B" on your keyboard and a window pane on the right side of the screen will pop open. Choose the browser folder TOP LEFT of the pane window and locate your dedicated external sample/loop folder. 12.mp4
  3. Will.
    Yep, CdB❎ is a typo . CbB✔️ = Cakewalk by Bandlab. ?
  4. Will.
    Just press "L" on the keyboard to get rid of the loop section (if its enabled.)
  5. Will.
    What gustabo said. Also, wear headphones when you're using the mic. The echo function was design to hear yourself on headphones as a reference, not through speakers. Lower your mic volume too, on both your OS, and mic if it comes with a build in volume and headphone jack and volume control.?
  6. Will.
    I'm not a reason user. It was taught to me in music school. I never even used it in my own projects so don't I'm one, be allergic to that! You see assumptions in thinking you know something, well it keeps your head buried in the sand. Get a manual of Cakewalk study it and come back to comment. If you can't follow instructions well, good luck in learning anything to it's core. All you do is insulting who's been trying to help you, newbie.
  7. Will.
    Dude, learn to work the DAW before talking nonsense! Don't become a cigarette butt.
  8. Will.
    But, by selecting all tracks by pressing Ctrl+A and than hold down on Ctrl as you tweak your faders, this is already possible. ?
  9. Will.
    This is cool and all, but it still doesn't speed up the work process. I've tried it and it works awesome, but on two occasions, I accidentally dragged the entire waveform envelope with. It's frustrating at times. So I still suggest visual clip gain. It is efficient and easier plus, speed up work process by a mile. Though, this does not rule out automation of course.
  10. Will.
    I'm like a 5 year old on this clip gain technique. ?
  11. Will.
    Everything asked here for "Improvement" Cakewalk already produces way better workflow than your list. You're used to reason, so now you want to implement reasons work around (which I know extremely well) to Cakewalk. It's like insulting someone's mother. ? NO! NO! NO! and that 75 of them? WOW!
  12. Will.
    Woaw! Yeah! This is a much easier way! Thanks a lot. Now, we just need to get this in visual. ?? I've done much better editing today with this method, and it is super quick!!!
  13. Will.
    1: Visual clip gain please.
  14. Will.
    Check your inbox and reply here bro.?
  15. Will.
    Still not as effective as to what me and msmcleaod talking about. It's a 2005 technique. We're in 2020, and need cleaner and more time saving powerful methods. Though, awesome little trick. It still affects the entire clip on my side and not the selected region.
  16. Will.
    What if we can skip all of this unwanted steps which is not as straight forward as my idea of visual clip gain directly on the waveform. Way easier and a time saver.
  17. Will.
    You see the problem with this Gswitz is, that it decreases the overall volume of the entire clip. You don't want to touch your the entire recording. By what I am suggesting will allow you to increase the volume, of only a certain word you want to make louder or decrease in volume.
  18. Will.
    Oh man! you had your hand full. lol. I do that when I'm in the mood for a lot of work. ??
  19. Will.
    That is what I'm crying for! You would make the community extremely happy if this could come to surface this year, after discussing it with the team. Appreciate that msmcleod.
  20. Will.
    I do the 16-32 backing vocals a lot, and that is why I brought up this topic. LOL! My approach is 95% exactly that same as your rack.
  21. Will.
    I here what you say, but why not eliminate some of that automation ride and add the slider or knob with the ability to only even out or decrease a spike?
  22. Will.
    Targeting a specific area/word/letter/breath to increase or decrease the clip volume, will be happening in real-time with a little slider or knob popping up on keyboard command. Is that the non-destructive normalization we're talking about?
  23. Will.
    That's why my suggestion on this non-destructive ability to normalize/gain only the word, letter or spike, will focus only on that area you want to edit fix/edit.
  24. Will.
    but with a gain staging ability in lowering or increasing only a letter or single word in the waveform. Surely it wont bring latency as you would have the ability to bounce your gain edit. I mean isn't that what happens when you apply the effect after you're happy with your increase/decrease in volume only on that specific area within the waveform?
  25. Will.
    What is your approach when processing backing vocals? Do you EQ, Compress, limit or use filters?
×
×
  • Create New...