Mr No Name

It's amazing the amount of music I have listened to over the years that I thought was original work only to find out years later that they were copies or cover versions of older music. the younger generations won't know they will think it's a new tune, it's the trick of it, the slight of hand. Elvis was almost always copying or covering other peoples music from earlier times I was informed, how many people are even aware of it ?

out of interest what do you rate as the great compressors?

it's unusual to hear a song with the chorus at the beginning and the end, I like it, a break from convention.

just had a look on their site after posting this and seen they had a magnetic tape bundle which included the studer A-800 aswell for another £10, seeing as it was less than a day since the purchase the good people at UAD agreed to let me change my purchase. good deal, both tape machines for £49

picked up ampex ATR-102 for same price native ,only just went native, exept £39 instead of $,

Could they not be bothered to do magnum k at the same time?

render in real time as said above.

they said this about the gramophone, we survived.

it's all a process of elimination.

Hello, do you have the input echo button pressed in?

As the title says, Now you have the new softwares up and running, make Cbb (by or now not by bandlab?) Donationware. If it is available going forward for people to access, ask for a donation, Donationware. I'm sure many people would. That was it. Thanks.

I managed to authorise through the help menu, luckily I didn't have to use much mental energy, about a kilojoule's worth. Regards.

apologies for the late reply, I haven't been on the forum, I wouldn't know how to answer the question my technical knowledge on these things is limited. I don't even read the manuals.

Do you people just spend all your money on plugins ?

I demo'ed these a while back, was quite underwhelmed with them tbh, bit bland and one dimensional imo.

I had the idea of a cloud based DAW about 7 years ago, wish I would have patented it, could have been rich.

do they actually improve the plug in after a WUP? or is it just less of a ballache to install and have a higher version number? I do believe alot of mac users are fans of waves.

it's more likely waves central broke waves, it likes to do that.

Oh ok, I wasn't aware of that.

No, the individual channels, when you load a synth, try dragging the synth to load on a seperate channel of its own each time, Instead of loading via the synth rack.

Have you considered accessing them from the channels individually and ignoring the synth rack?

robot mastering engineer with 6 fingers ? tbf I have heard good reports about the version 11 but I have no intention of trying it myself. on a side note bandlab have a self mastering algorhythm, which I tested to try, and although not fantastic, wouldn't be bad for a rough loudened master. and also is free.

it has a thing that "listens" to your song and masters it accordingly, so yes, some type of AI, not a very bright one.

Ozone 11 is supposed to be better, maybe they got better on that one. it seems whatever you put in there even if it's - 5 lufs, it will try to make it - 4, instead of saying "hang on a minute" and realising it sounds rubbish and should be at -8 lufs. The moral of this story is don't use ozone to master your songs, use a person.

get rid of it, I used the elements 10 version to "master" an already mastered track as an experiment, It sounded awful. if it really was as clever as it thinks it is, it would have known it was already mastered.