CSistine

Thanks! This means there must be a setting in my project/preferences that makes a difference, whatever it is! I can't imagine something else, because there is nothing that I did in addition in such a new project. I use v1.3.0 of InfiniStrip. As it does not crash in Sonar Platinum I tried now to create there a new project with the same template that I use in CbB. Though this gives a warning (newer version) it works and does not crash, i.e. it is not the project configuration that is relevant. Now I will spend some time to compare the other preferences, perhaps I can find out what is the culprit setting.

Did you set the track interleave to mono (before or after)? If you put it on a stereo track, then there's no problem!

Now I have tested with CbB 2023.09 and it is still a crash (but not in Sonar Platinum)!

There are also the 2 harpsichords from Sampletekk: https://www.sampletekk.com/historic-keyboards I like especially the ST Virginal for integration in rock music. I prefer it over the one of Experimenta or the one in the Kontakt Factory Library.

"bunch"? They bought almost all what was the source of Cakewalk Inc.! Only that's what I wanted to state. Actually I didn't and don't want to argue about that old stuff, but it provokes me if people sugarcoat BL. There have been a lot of promises and indications in the last years and most is not true anymore. Just read the old theads. But maybe I (and some others) have just a growing fantasy, i.e. it's all pure imagination! That's what I said in other words, too!

Do you really think this is righteous? Because they just did some sort of hedge lawyer thing to skip the liabilities? IMHO they have bought Cakewalk, by all means what was the value of the company! What else had Cakewalk been? But you are correct regarding the law it looks all different, it is totally legal what they do. Our fine constitutional states, democracies support this best behavior. They concentrate more to give a hard time to John Doe!

This is not true! You may purchase the discounted license $60, if (from the Reaper page): You are an individual, and REAPER is only for your personal use, or You are an individual or business using REAPER commercially, and yearly gross revenue does not exceed USD $20,000, or You are an educational or non-profit organization. In addition to that I have to mention that Either the $60 or $225 are valid for many releases/updates (years) You can install a portable version that is very safe for any purpose, because there is no need for internet connection/servers!

My knowledge is based on Europe. And I'm surprised that in the U.S. it seems to be quite different! I just know that in Europe (northern + central) generally the wages have almost not changed in the last decade, only the prices have increased a lot in the last 2 years (not before)! But I must admit I don't know this about the U.S., I just expected it is about the same.

Thanks a lot! I did not know this for all the years I worked with Sonar. It makes life so much easier changing MIDI values in the Event Inspector! Regrettably it does not work in the clip/track properties.

I wonder why? Here wages have almost not increased and I think that's the major cost factor for them!

It's interesting that in a time where many people have less money to spend, the prices of several plugin providers have raised significantly (>20%)!

It will! I am also using 2022.11, since the latest version does not support offline authorization until now! ? But I had re-authorized my pcs before the old offline-auth was abandoned.

It's not buying a package what I've meant, it's more the ones with a hundred of separate add-ons (like e.g. Overloud) that are costly in the end! And the other question to you: Do you really use most amps, cabs in the package? In packages I often use barely 20%. Hence it is not really a deal! ? What I forgot to mention (one time positive ?) is that there are some amp packages (e.g. like Guitar Rig ?) that are not so update prone and the reason is that they do not have add-on philosophy!

I like the older stand-alone amps from Audio Assault, have most of them. But the new model with amp-locker where amps and pedals are hoarded and are add-ons is not my taste (like IK, Overloud, ...). I hate that these kind of hubs grow in size, have so many updates to no avail (if you do not buy the new add-ons) and are so huge on the screen. And in the end the add-on style is more expensive. But YMMV.

IMHO this is definitely a good example of a failed software design by Celemony (but they are by far not the only ones in that boat)! For me it would absolutely make more sense to store the rendering cache somewhere in the project folder instead! If you want to clean a project, then everything belonging to the project should be in there (except audio files that the user explicitly links from another place as it is possible in CbB and some other daws).

It is sad that such a big company is not able to show the current versions and changelog on the download page! There it is still 2.6.0, resp. 2.7.0 !

Wanted to get console AMEK. But regrettably it has no direct value input and for a channel strip this is crucial for me (have some others that support it)! I'll pass! Other than that there are only bits and bobs that I don't have and are interested in a bit! So no PA again!

I have the Aurora choir from ARIA and I am not convinced of this product at all! Was wasted money!

Forgot to add: One thing that I hate with all these machine authorizations (e.g. Splat, CbB) is that you don't know on what components they are based! Like that it is always a surprise when you change, remove or add a system component whether they still work! It is totally user-unfriendly!!

AFAIK it won't stop as long as you do not change your system! The only difference to X3 or older versions is that Splat needs online authorization for a new or changed system.

IIRC Sonar does not need a phone home connection (I have Sonar installed now for a decade). Once authorized it keeps that authorization on the machine as long nothing is changed! No most software does not require a checkin (I could list easily more than 100 examples), but you're right about the examples above! Furthermore it is a difference if it needs checkin for one time per machine (Cherry/Toontrack) and then keeps authorization or not (like CbB)!

For me a reason could be the authorization. I could accept an ongoing authorization for the free product, but I am not willing to PAY for something like that! It's not future-safe at all, IMHO! But it's also true for me: I have invested so much learning in this DAW that I rather would like to keep it! Other than the authorization it could be that some minor things have been removed/changed that I liked so much (multiple plugin layouts, external plugin manager, Radius stretch methods, the way of comping, ...). We'll see!

Regrettably I cannot run it, because I only have Kontakt 6 (7 required)!

Yes, it is a trend, but still there are a some others! It would make the decision very easy for me, if the new Sonar had a time limited activation (re-activation needed)! Then I will surely pass! (I accepted it for a free product, but would never for a payed one!) I don't think this is the main reason! I am sure it is more this big brother thing a) for the marketing department and b) to force users to new versions! Poor guy! ? I have quite a lot of actual software that does not depend on online nag. The last 2 years I focus my purchases on this! But there are also some companies that are on a black list because of their activation! ? The minimum requirement for me is offline activation (this is also fulfilled with iLok!) and most companies still support this.

It's a pity that most of these K-Player libraries are not available as K-Full version! ? I hate to install with NA and secondly, the Kontakt Libraries panel gets even more overcrowded!