Zo

Amen !

Ahhaaahh ouf thk , i was like 99 he ened up paying twice ... uk must have brexited out of their mind lol So yep this lib seems a piece of art ...

There was a known issue with one vst3 colponent of it lessing sonar plugin names .... so the solution was to erase this component until they solve it ... I did .

197 ? Tell me that this is a tipo or you went for the full library. Not this solo violon ...

Strange people tend skip or underestimate that interfacing will impact what you get from a product ... this is why th3 and thu have been slept on ( by the majority ) until slate put the light on em , not the best interface to deal with ... ik should also think about updating the browsing thing and the interface , as well as the routing .... i ve spent literally like 2 weeks on offtimes to make presets on bothbjust to skip the headache of variety and interfacing ...

i swear i was about to post that because in my mind , you sleep sometime !!! lol dope deal , i think they're counter attack to spitfire violon thingy ?

just saw this at JRRSHOP ...to make it even more difficult lol ...choose one .... ahahaha !!

Rsize of GUI , now we're talking ,testing here , makes the whole experinece diff !!, why didn't they released this from scratch like that ?

articulations : Fingered Legato Bowed Legato Portamento Legato Runs Arpeggios Spiccato Staccato Tremolo Trills Molto vibrato

The first thing i made with Amplitube (and my other amp) is to match them with my gain staging , and resave all patches i liked and new ones in studio one presets manager , and yep i remeber this issue , not only this amp but several other "artist named collection" witch is because i think they're were'nt consistant gain wise

didn't watched the video but this says it all ./...what he prefers other the real thing is the diffrence in tone , not the quality , right !!! and this diff is mic'ing , cabinet ect ....even listening to your real amp in it's cabinet vesrus amp sim in you monitor is like night and day ....

Guyz sorry for the tipô , was on my ipad .... anyway you get my point ... the conclusion is that we have superbe tools didffre,ts taste adn the most important : different wayz to perceive things due to our brain (ears are only transmitting infos) oh yep @Carlos on one exemple the soldano in TH3 sounded crap on solo and the best in mix lol ...go figure

Guyz what you describes is exactly the probem : Any small move , from a 0,2 eq move to a 5 mm mic move , is amplified like craaazy with amp I don t even talk about overdrive and disto box added to the chain , add to this cabinets , mic sampling ect... So unless you get the exact same sound , you can not judge to signal , period , the only thing you gonna hear is difference in tone .... or like you stated differences in higher freq register due to the design , i know mebrini and pa filters a lot high freq , a lot of amp sim does that , this results on what i said to a friend like a feeling of lo fi in the mix versus a real amp ... So my point is , if you guyz fire a marshall and another marshall and just say this one is superior because you prefer the sound , it s just irrelevant , i m amazed how different a SAME amp can sound presets from presets just with small moves ...due to what i explained before ... So how did i made my statement : i opened each amp and did the sound i ve found the best for the song ... one is orange , one is soldano , one is fender , one is randall ect ...did a blind test and the orange came several time at first ... and when in another exemple i needed more depth to compete with for exemple with the membrini and neutal dsp (thks mainly to their cabinet impulses witch is imho where they shine ) i succed to have even more depth with the cabinet section in amplitube ... So at the end , i m not saying this is better than that , i m saying ´ this one is no better than that .... The fact that one amp sim leads you to a sound you label "good" faster than another , is what counts and it has nothing to due with faithfull emulation but more with design (interfacing and algo design ) some gain structure are linear , other are not , some eq's are linear some are proporionaly Q'ed , some deafult setting are already eq differently to let you play with eq and feel smoother that competition ect ...

I hate you all lol .... so i was cooling , then i clicked on this thread ..tested mebrini , then teste neural dsp , then cabinet talk , went STLtones , downloaded cabintes then i'm trying every of their amps ....? EDIT : my conclusion is simple , the more i try other stuff the more i think Amplitube is fantastic .... yep other stuff are great but nothing i can't achieve with amplitube , its strengthy might be it's cons : choices / versatibility

you rock , i'm also liking the torpedo ..a friend has an amp sim from them (HW) and it's a serious piece .... (and he hates plugin sim lol )

Does this comes with good IR ? http://www.igniteamps.com/

You can just tell me what ir loader and where to get good ir ....

ok that's the small detail you get on annoucement on the wayyyy under ...written super small .... what are you using , all my friend tell me about tnot using built in cab but ir loader and this celeston name comes a lot !

ahahahah i swear i tested on it from scratch ...lol i was tchating also with a friend on Fb ...lol

lol @Soundwise was chilling until we fukkk ed up the thread Carlos ....lol she was like "ok guyz , here we go !!!" Thks @Soundwise just tested it , it need more meat so 'im tweakin g but at least i have the riff !!!

try also this impulse as start on the red neck !!

yes check this out : start from here , this amp is indeed precise and beefy at the same time

On a technical side ,guyz analyse the space around the voice , that ambience ...is to study !!

check this line

lol ok now i understand , i hate those tones ...it's just taking of any articulation , it's like painting a piant with BIgggg brushes if you know what i mean ....i'm more a Monnet guy