Jump to content

Byron Dickens

Members
  • Posts

    3,275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Byron Dickens

  1. That is a depreciated, unsupported 32bit plugin. Not worth the hassle.
  2. I believe that before adding a plugin, one should take a long, hard look and decide "do I really need this; is it really adding something necessary, or just more clutter to deal with?" I read your reasoning behind this and quite frankly I think you could accomplish the same result with only one. I know I can. When people use more than one EQ on a track, it is usually to have one as a broader, more creative tool to shape the sound and another in a more surgical role to fit it into the mix better. For example, creating complementary EQ curves to fit bass and kick drum together after shaping the broader sound of each. And this is coming from the guy who layers 6 different synthesizers on top of one another or runs a guitar through a live amp and four different sims.
  3. Not use so many is one. 3 different EQs on a track is unnecessary and overkill.
  4. OMG! No, not logic and reason! Forfend!
  5. Did you change the edit filter back to "clips" from "automation"after you added your envelope?
  6. You have to map your controller to whatever you're controlling.
  7. You wanna know why the mom & pop stores are struggling? That's it right there; not because big corporations are evil.
  8. And like Jack said, be sure to get rid of all the bloatware. No doubt that laptop is packed with it, with about 7 million useless, BS, apps all running on startup.
  9. Why wouldn't the one master volume on the one interface that has multiple speaker outputs accomplish the task?
  10. "I have win7 with update problem" means a problem with updating Win 7. At least according to the way English works. At any rate, not only does MS no longer support W7, neither does CbB.
  11. You asked for input. I gave it: save yourself the headaches and use a device that is designed for what you want to do. You want really what amounts to some version of surround sound. Well, the simple way to accomplish that is with a device that has multiple speaker outputs. People come on here and ask about doing stuff in some back- asswards, overly complicated way. That's fine. If you don't know, you don't know. That's why you ask questions. But what flabbergasts me is that when the practical guy like me who likes to do things the simple way comes around and says " that sounds like a lot of trouble, you could do this simple, easy thing instead and get the same results," they act like I've cast aspersions upon their ancestry.
  12. You beat me to it. I got to thinking and realized well yeah some manufacturers have drivers that let you use identical interfaces together and the driver makes the computer see it all as one interface. So, as far as the computer knows it's only one interface. Trying to kludge Rube Goldberg workarounds together is just going to cause headaches. Why not just make it easy on yourself and get an interface that has enough speaker outputs to do what you want?
  13. Cultures have been "appropriating" one another ever since the first time two different tribes crossed paths.
  14. Too late now, but these things are so much easier when they're taken care of in pre-production.
  15. Short answer: No. Longer answer: that's not how it's done. First, quadraphonic is obsolete. Second if you want to do surround sound, how you do it is with an interface that has multiple outs.
×
×
  • Create New...