Will.

Now you're just rambling a lot of BS and making things up. Cause what that Guy explain in that video on "Pre Roll" is exactly as in these videos I have sent. At this point I believe you do not know what you want and just making up things everytime. No dang difference as he even said he has to go in and out of record by punching it in. I believe you're confusing this with step record. In the millenial morse code of @bdickens RTFM!

Infact: I take back my previous reply about it would beneficial to have it, cause it just dawn on me now, Cakewalk has been doing this way before STOne. I just never use it because i find it of no use. Step.mp4

Pretty sure this applies to you at this point. Cause If you go into the preferences and the metronome TAB what you're looking for is there. Then locate the record TAB and select Auto Punch and make some changes there. Different DAWs = different way of setting things up Just like every country that has its own language. The same goes for DAWS and analog consoles. It does the same thing, but the approach to get there is different.

I think your confusion comes with the pop-up windows in STOne and the Preference Window in Cakewalk. Use the shortcut keys Ctrl-W to toggle between the desired playhead options. Otherwise: Pretty much the same as in STOne and Logic. Roll.mp4

So you have a timing issue? (No disrespect) Cause I get good results on the first take with a count-in. I set a permanent 4beat count-in on one measure before the actual recording starts and nail it then and there. Its less mouse clicks. I just press Alt&R to arm the track and hit R when im ready to record. What ever I want to record - i always make sure it is stuck in my head. Like i've said: I do not see it as a "HUGE" improvement but only as a "Beneficial" option to have for those that finds it difficult to nail things on the first go with a "count-in." PS: I just tested this in CbB and there dont seem to be any difference. What are you actually requesting? I even watched your video.

So you have a timing issue? (No disrespect) Cause I get good results on the first take with a count-in. I set a permanent 4beat count-in on one measure before the actual recording starts and nail it then and there. Its less mouse clicks. I just press Alt&R to arm the track and hit R when im ready to record. What ever I want to record - i always make sure it is stuck in my head. Like i've said: I do not see it as a "HUGE" improvement but only as a "Beneficial" option to have for those that finds it difficult to nail things on the first go with a "count-in." PS: I just tested this in CbB and there dont seem to be any difference. What are you actually requesting? I even watched your video.

I wouldn't go as far as to say its a "HUGE" improvement. Though I hear what you're saying. I've used it before, in fact just recently when a pianist asked for it using logic pro in the main studio. I wouldn't use it myself, i really dont see the point in it - but it would be nice to have the option when collaborating with other producers/beatmakers and when artists from other labels ask for it. But to say it is an improvement - NOPE. It would rather be "Beneficial" to have it as an option available in case it gets asked for.

Yep. Been using it for 10 years. I use mostly dB5meter these days when I'm not in Logic.

? Wear your reading glasses @David Baay ?

What ever happened to AN-879 Analyst? I don't recall having her in X1. Did she come bundled or as a separate purchase? What happen to all these lost plugins? There seems to be plenty i dont recall ever seeing over the years. Was this before the X1 Series?

Even with it being documented - it was the case back then. It had a BUG. I remember reporting this in the old forum where it would grab a pan knob (if it was the last step) before wanting to do the "quick group." It caused a lot of unwanted tweaks, because the last step that was done were still locked in on the previous worked on track or tweaked macro (with that open bracket four corner shape thing.) I believe it is still being used today in CbB, but its unlinked to any mouse movement and key press. So, with that i'll stand firm on this by saying it was in fact a bug even if it was intended to work that way, documented or not. Dont know, it's the OP's statement. By the way: You make it sound like, I said it, by quoting that BS with my name to it. ??? Not cool! My topic on reset all gain to unity like with the faders and this thread are two widely different topics. Dont be an a**!

Well, this was annoying and broken in SPLAT which created a lot of issues for many. Now, it works perfectly as it was intented to work in sonar, but never got to be fixed. Like the above member said: It is now a fully working quick group function that are multi-functioned with sweet benefits to it. Not a stupid idea at all. If you had spend more time trying to figure this out, you wouldve noticed the ability are still there for a multi view pane. It just make more sense to have a single pane view anyway. Bandlab caters for all. Making workflow more streamline. Thousands of bugs that sonar had (like those you've mentioned) were fixed by Bandlab developers who happens to be the old team of Sonar anyway. Wait-What?! Would you look at that, who would have known?

With me, its the plugins. Inserting an effect in a project that was created in the previous update build takes 5 seconds longer. Not sure why, but its not a deal breaker. The client chose that track and she recorded on it. Hooked my laptop up at the label she's signed to and worked with it like that. This was three weeks ago back in Holland. What you need to check for in your situation are your plugin oversampling size settings if you're using any. It causes latency which sounds like what you're experiencing. My experience taught me when ever that happens, I need to isolate and locate the issue. Normally I do this by going through every plugin I have on insert and bypass them one-by-one. When the culprit plugin are located, I normally just replace it with another of the same processing. This happens outside of CbB too. I run Mac in my studio and this happens in Logic and Pro tools too. Its a per project issue. It works fine in one project and in the next one - it creates latency.

You are correct. What we're basically installing today are just the core updates on the original DAW. I believe this is a way for the developers to track what was worked on and what still needs to be fixed from where the previous company stopped with their developments.

Lol! I give up! It was clear in the OP. Keep saying the same thing. I keep repeating the reason. But, because you're a great guy and an active member on the forum (unlike me ?) I will repeat this again. Question: How long does it normally take your system to load an unmixed 16 channel project without buses or aux tracks in it, because 10 seconds feels already too long for me to wait for just audio tracks to load. If that same project still have its instrument audio tracks as VSTi in it -it takes close to 20 seconds to load (depending on the size of the instruments of course.) I've timed a 32 channel project load with its instruments and aux tracks that took 1m8s (00:01:08) to load. Way-too-Long. The second scenario: A 25 min audio for an episode that crashed the DAW twice in the middle of the export. I had to do a live bounce which took 25 mins. The previous episodes took close to 5mins to export - which in itself is too long. So in order for CbB to make a "physical copy" which you're proposing and suggesting it should; including a want for it -- would be to take the DAW back 20 years with this approach in its project load and SAVING speeds. The loading and save speeds are the reasons why daws and film editors do not do this. They rather came up with a brilliant idea to have the program make a "memory copy" of it. Hence why the project loads and saved projects are 20 times faster today with video and audio in them today. Having the DAW (and video editors programs) to stream the video from its original saved location and path was a brilliant invention and creation with this idea for project load speeds and to save them . This idea first came into creation with Video Programs that does their own audio in their software - such as Sony Vega Pro. DAW creators then tooks this brilliant idea and implemented it in their brands too. So, having the DAW to stream the video from its original path by creating a "memory copy" of the file is a more streamline approach towards workflows and PROJECT SPEEDS. And if this isnt clear enough for you, then I dont know what would be Milton.

I'm looking into smaller monitor resolutions. I just hooked up a copy of Cakewalk in the main Studio from my laptop and at 28 inch 4k - Yikes! Pretty sure i'll be wearing glasses running it like this. Also, because PT and Logic too have their downsides on it. Anyone here running Cake on: 24/27inch 2560x1440 or . . . 23/24 inch 1920 x 1080 Pictures of the console view would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. ☺

As mentioned before without trying to argue this, theres literally just a handful of software that does this and if you think about it - it really doesnt make sense to make a copy of a video file the is already saved on your computer - otherwise every Film Video Editor would have done this, but they dont. Think of file size. (Im repeating myself.) Secondly: Music apps is literally just designed to be as its abbreviation calls them - Digital Audio Workstation. Not D.A.V.W or D.V.A.W (with respect.) Lastly: Have you looked at every Audio File Folders in your saved projects? For every tweak you make - it save multiple copies of the same file you've worked on. It will have to do the same for the Video file. Imagine all that copies of your (minimum) 5GB video file size. What do you think will happen if you have a 70GB video file | or | your 90min video file? Making copies would be ridiculous time consuming taking us back to windows 2000/XP saving speeds, plus a waste of unnecessary space on the drive. There's lots of reasons why these Video editors and Daws dont do it. It just doesn't make sense. Im not trying to rain on your parade here. There's just a lot of factors that comes in to play that prevent this.

I'm a member just like you. My picture size are about the same as yours, but I normally just take a screenshot of the picture I had taken, if I want to upload one, which comes out less than 1MB every time. ☺ Heads up: In case you want to upload a video next time - it should not exceed 4.88MB. ?

Please create one thread when you post multiple stuff next-time. Thanks. ☺

Nope. There are literally just a handful of software in world of programs that actually save the video as a copy within the saved file. Again: a handful software only. Not even the film industries most popular high graphics video editors does this - for reasons such as file size issues and all the other complications that comes with it.

Did you scan for it? Also make sure you have it installer to the correct folder. Program files/common files/vst3 If you do not have the Vst3 installed, look under Program files/VstPlugin folder.

Ah!!! I've re-read the OP. Both should work though. I've done it before.

Normally you want to go to SOURCE CATEGORY (What to Bounce TAB) and choose TRACKS within the Bounce Window to make all the available tracks appear and select the desired one to bounce.

You have to tick both boxes for the Lexicon Mac in the INPUTS and Outputs window seen on this pic here.

Locate the tilde key on your computer keyboard (its the button above the TAB) and bounce the desired files to track.