chris.r

Oh yes Pettinhouse and also Ilia Efimov, but I don't do Kontakt. Might need to at some point. I'm only Player .

I was looking for one where you could build your own patterns and still keep it sounding realistic, not artificial. I think this is the first one that I could accept the quality. OTS are brilliant for melodic stuff but I'm exhausted from fighting it's pattern sequencer for anything more ambitious there. I was getting desperate to give him an idea for creating a strum oriented library... like this one above . Still missing the spanish and ability for slow strums like in the song ending.

At last. Are there any good known alternatives already?

Would be interesting to see it for Windows but I'm not sure doing it they are going to open the Pandora's box

That I actually can see in a positive light. I like MuseScore and it's brilliant for what price they're asking.

Hi Mark, can you expand on this? How exactly do they differ? In particular, I would expect the lists to be the same, and the envelope to be the same as the old 'chart' view - at least so long as the changes are all jumps. I would like to hear more too. Except that the nodes can serve as a handle that we can drag with mouse now, and the curves, the two was likely the same to me (working same way). Oops... posting at the same time.

Agree and in addition I think it brings much hope for many more and exciting uses in the future. This probably belongs to the feature request forum but can we MIDI learn the Tap Tempo? Also there is some king of reset missing when you'd want to start tapping a new tempo.

Have you been playing with the Arranger Track in this project? IIRC there is some conversion between the Arranger sections and markers possible, if so, you may have encountered a bug. If not, than maybe your keyboard is failing, like Colin suggests.

One hit is one marker while the project is running. Keep the key pressed down for a while and it will eventually turn into series or markers.

Didn't you fall into sleep over your last project with the nose in the 'M' key? LOL joking, the 'M' key is for that A1 marker input, maybe that's how.

Lol, yes they look like a series of markers. Try open the markers view and check there. Maybe it's an offspring related to the Arranger Track and some conversion between the two.

Thanks for confirming. In my post I was relating more to a hypothetical situation where Cakewalk would hiddenly replace an audio device's outputs with another when the previous is not plugged in, as described here: something similar, only with audio devices, happened to me in the past. Unfortunately it took me by surprise and I didn't check the conditions that led to it. But Ronny's right I should open a separate topic. Anyway glad to see MIDI routing issues are being nailed. EDIT: actually I created a thread but it didn't help much.

I was sitting on the fence and while still climbing there I 'accidentally' pushed the Buy button...🙃

I'm going to try this out. Was on a look out for a dark, flat and minimalistic, perfect. Not going to put any pressure on you but... how long until release?

That, I would call a design flaw, rather than bug. I mean, in Windows, is an app not being able to distinguish perfectly between different devices connected? I thought each device has its unique signature number or something. If so, then it should be easy for the DAW to assign an internal number for each respectively... and not mess with the numbers later on.

Happened to me in the past. It resulted in a huge mess to the point I had to reload synths from the scratch. Also I recall Cakewalk somehow managed to swap two physical outputs in a project or template, don't remember exactly. I had two physical devices connected to my Pc, one on the Master bus and another on a send bus, and with time, while disconnecting one of them occasionally for no use, I did end up with the two being swapped permanently and had to reassign it again. How?

😂🤣

I'll eventually get this, but I've also watched some Gullfoss videos and there's nothing to worry about it. Its sound is spot on, best in the market I'd say. And this new live version. My only gripe is with the price! What I like about Smooth Operator is the ability for some serious tone shaping in addition to just subtle resonance taming. Didn't see that in Gulfoss, it always does sound hifi, can't produce bad sound.

How long this sale, anyone? Thx

Ok, so based on the first videos I can easily nominate it for an excellent poor man's Goolfos/Smoothie alternative best candidate... (read: for me!)

I figured out I'd hold off and wait for a GB.

Since we're already off topic I'll just chime in my 50c. The spoken Ctrl+D for duplicate in most other DAWs became such a big part of people's workflow that Cakewalk simply had to adapt to it like there was no option, in trying to catch up with the front line. It was the user demand. I'm for example (a "limited group" long time Cakewalk/Sonar user) very uncomfortable with lassoing events with the right mouse click especially in the PRV since X1, but I had to accept it, there's the good and the ugly about it. Was there a switch in the preferences for legacy mode, sure I'd use it.

What I do is delete one fx by mouse and then just press and hold DELETE on the keyboard. For some reason it won't work without deleting one fx with the mouse prior to just hitting the delete key.

Agreed. I'm playing with the new menu system now and the timing for opening submenus for me is perfect. It helps with keeping it uncluttered and thus making it navigating comfortably. 👍

Interesting. Waiting to see how does it stack up against Gulfoos and Smoothie. Gulfoss has a dark skin so that's already a +1 on start