Bruno de Souza Lino

They're making progress towards making sure you need a super computer to run their software.

I feel like people don't spend as much money on the full version of Kontakt as they used to in the past, so libraries which require the full version are fated to lose money if they're not priced right.

Knowing these companies, they'll probably not use hardware acceleration, which means your unmixing will be even slower, as Demucs is more hardware intensive. Quality is a bit better than Spleeter but you still don't have the high content above 17k because Demucs also uses the MusDB dataset with some extra songs added into the training. The two mashups I posted in the forum were done using Demucs.

There should be a bunch of Jon Lord presets since version 1.3 when Jordan Ruddess used B3-X live to perform with Deep Purple.

At this rate, Deskew is gonna introduce a new sales format called "Chapter 11."

That's gotta be one of the most meh user interfaces for a plugin I've seen so far. Everything seems out of place and doesn't match.

But then you wouldn't need Audiolens.

If you ignore their blurry interface which only seems to render sharp in a 4k display then yes, Mixbox is relatively unproblematic.

I guess they deserve props for using AI generated video to promote an AI based plugin but....Where are the sound demos?

I would steer away from anything Unison Audio makes, even if they paid me to use their plugins. They're scammers. And will remain like that.

It already is. All targets you capture with it can be acessed in Ozone 10 and Neutron 4.

Probably. I don't have either, so I don't know.

In my opinion, this feels more like damage control than anything remotely resembling customer care and support. I won't be surprised if Deskew also have posts in every other forum or community where negative opinions of their practices formed. Plus companies deserve no props for doing what's essentially their job.

Unless it's a free version of VMR which doesn't require a 45 USD iLok dongle to use, I'm not interested.

They don't have to. Plus a good portion of audio interfaces in the market suddenly become supported by Linux simply because they have to work on mobile devices and, you can't install drivers on those either. The same goes for MIDI devices. Bitwig has a DAW which has a native Linux version as well as Cockos, Tracktion and Harrison. uhe has all their plugins in Linux Native versions. Plus there's the new CLAP format, which has native Linux support as well. It's very easy to spread FUD as well. It may not exist for you, but it exists for other people.

And I managed to get 6 Unfiltered Audio plugins that way.

As mentioned in the other thread, Audiolens is uselss if you don't own Neutron 4 or Ozone 10.

Well, if you happen to be part of Corridor Crew, you'd think you reinvented animation because you used AI to produce bad rotoscoping and it took you 6 months to produce a 4 minute animation, the bulk of that time consisted of training algorithms and tweaking settings. An animation team using modern animation tools would've been done in a fraction of the time.

One thing I'd be careful is with opinions that bash Linux with a clear notion of distros from 1995. Or people that claim Linux to be worse because it's different. There are a lot of those out there.

REAPER, Bitwig and Waveform have the exact same codebase and features on Linux and Windows, so who knows where that statement came from.

Next has more chances of getting a Linux version, but it's up to the people at Bandlab to do it, which I think it's gonna be a 'no.' You're better off going for one of the other DAW who were "dellusional" enough to have a Linux version, like REAPER, Bitwig and Waveform.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHr0VWFGL9c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN35V1U6LqY

The drawbars are just part of the equation. Another thing to consider is Hammond organs don't have a sustain pedal, so you have to think in terms of how an organ player would voice their chords and craw to move into different notes without interrupting the past note. The second important one is how the plugin represents velocity. Hammonds don't have a velocity sensitive keybed (volume is done with a pedal on the pedalboard). Instead they have a 9 contact keybed where each contact is one drawbar. For example, if you have all drawbars out but only press one key lightly, you're only gonna hear the sound of the 1' drawbar. Dig in more and you start hearing the other ones. This is the reason why you see guys like Keith Emerson playing this staccato percussive sound in some scenarios. I don't remember which organ plugins emulate that, but that's also emulated on the digital organs Hammond makes. How they do it involve distributing that feature across different MIDI velocities.

These two are the perfect example of taking extremely reference songs from an artist or band and turning them into the most bland pedestrian thing you can imagine because you are either a sock puppet or lack imagination:

This one comes with a lesson, which is don't cover songs if you don't even know the order the lyrics are supposed to go...Or the lyrics: