Mark Morgon-Shaw

Not a bad idea which could be really handy but for the examples you gave you could just select multiple clips ( Ctrl - click ) and then use the Process menu to apply it to all of them in one go. Another option I've used is to get a Stream Deck and program the buttons with macros of the things I use the most. I quite often want to transpose certain midi clips up or down an octave. This can be a bit cumbersome - Process - Transpose - type in the + or - 12 semitones - OK. So I now have a dedicated transpose up or down button that selects all those things for me with a single button press which is much quicker. Would it not be simpler to just set the delay up on it's own bus and then you can send whichever instruments you want to share the same effect. ? I think the basic idea has some merit but like most sugestions there are already ways to acheive the same result in many use cases. We also has the duplicate commmand ( Ctrl-D) to repeat copy/paste of audio and midi clips. I use that all the time but not everyone knows about it.

Yes ! Or subscibe - or rent to own etc. - whichever looks the best option ( I sell SAAS so I have a good understanding of different licensing models )

I remember when it wasn't Mac only - back in the Emagic days..iirc Magix bought the old Windows code and rebadged it as their own DAW

Thanks Noel. Whilst I wasn't specifically citing them as workflow deficiencies when answering the OP, I would argue some of them are workflow deficiencies, some are new feature requests and some of them fall into both categories where a new feature can address an existing workflow issue where it takes more steps to achieve the same outcome in CBB/Sonar than some other DAWs. A prime example of this would be an integrated sampler where swapping out a kick drum sample for example takes seconds to drag & drop and updates the whole song, but currently we may have to delete and replace each sample on the track , or open up the drum replacer and work that way. A new feature that massively enhances the workflow of sample based producers. I'll be interested to see how it works in Next and hopeful that it will make it's way to the new Sonar in due course. Yes there have been many excellent improvements over the past 5yrs, I would add the Arranger to the list too. Amazing really that we have been given these for free. But it also sets the bar moving forward as a paid product and the competition have not been idle either. I always tell people that the best DAW is the one you know. I've used various versions of Cakewalk since the mid 90's and I've never found a good enough reason to switch to anything else. I started out as a complete amatuer but now I make 80 - 100 music library tracks a year which yields a reasonable part time income. I do think it lends me a certain perspective that not all Cakewalk users are privy to such as working to deadlines, making deliverables and just the sheer variety of genres expected of library composers in general. It's a completely different ballgame to when I made music out of pure enjoyment and the demands on the tools become magnified as the workload increases. This is why I will argue endlessly for ( or against ) certain things that I believe will help drive the software to become a more adept tool for those of us working at the coal face of production music. Only in a cumbersome way - see this discussion ( FWIW I wrote my own macro so it's a button on my Stream Deck - better workflow ) This type of thing https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.presonus.dawremote&hl=en&gl=US A proper way of controlling certain aspects of the DAW from a mobile device Thanks for responding Noel, I realise that other Dev Teams may have more resources at their disposal, I think the team have done a great a job since the switch to Bandlab and I hope the switch back to paying for it again will help accellerate the growth of both platforms. When not making music my other gig is IT sales of cloud based packages which includes an element of on site hardware and as part of my role I often have to report back to the Dev Teams and come up with new ideas for features and QoL improvments so I am always happy and comfotable to give feedback and suggestions as someone who also clocks up a lot of hours using CBB .

Yeah they are a good way of trying out new parts or arrangements without affecting the orginal track

Off the top of my head .... 1. Proper sampler / sample based workflow 2. Chord track 3. Easier hardware integration for control surfaces etc 4. Negative offset 5. Bar zero 6. Spatial Audio Ready 7. Remote Control 8. Varispeed 9. Retrospective Midi Record 10. Scale constrain 11. MPE Supprt 12. Bounce/Renderin Place 13. Loudness Metering 14. Updated Browser 15. Scratch Pads

Exactly. This is how you should archive tracks and guard against old plugins not working. Run stems or track outs - then it doesn't matter what happens. You can still reconstruct the track in an editable form. Example from today's session . Everything the Music Library requests so they have some options when working to picture. For those who think that might be a PITA it's much quicker than in the pre-DAW days , we had to make a safety copy of the tape and then write down all the settings for the outboard gear !

Having built up a collection of preffered 3rd party plugins over many years I don't ideally want anything bundled with it as I would never use it, so the option to have it bare bones as possible would be prefereable . Same goes with the bundled instruments which are merely adequate at best, anyone with a basic version of Kontakt will have a much higher quality selection to choose from.

The problem is that varies greatly from individual to individual. I make music income every quarter , just yesterday was notified I earned almost $1k from one of my tracks on a Youtube video which will likely cover whatever the are going to charge for the next 2 - 5yrs .....so whatever they are asking will be well worth it for me perosnally as I've used it for 25yrs, I'm fast and has pretty much everything I need, There are other folks just wanna dabble and make a few songs a year, they are not earning anything from what is essentially a professional grade tool. Those folks likely wouldn't be willing to pay as much as I would as there is no ROI. Maybe this is why they are making Cakewalk Next s well so you have a consumer level package and a Pro level package and pay appropriately based on your needs.

They told us a lot of the cost of "old" Sonar was due to the bundled 3rd party instruments and plugins which is why they were not included with CBB I for one use very little of the bundled plugins , I don't really use the Pro Channel and none of the instruments really cut it for tracks I make for my publishers. I would prefer to be able to pay for a bare bones version with no added "filler" that I will never use and let those that do want it all bundled in pay the extra if they wish.

You're lucky, we have had 2 dead Imacs and a dead MBP...belong to my wife & kids not me. I took them apart and they all overheated and fried the Logic board..which Apple won't sell you. Just poor thermal design to make them look sleek. Give me an ATX case any day. I did just buy my wife an M2 Mac Mini to replace the 2014 model she is still running, to be fair that's done well but I was disgusted at the price of the extra storage...£200 to go from a virtually laughable 256gb to a still small 512gb SSD that costs about £40. The fact they are non-user upgradeable is insane to me. But..she wont' use a PC so what can I do. Thankfully the kids have grown up gamers and all wanted PC's which we built together.

It effectively expires as it's eventually rendered obsolete by O/s & hardware incpompatibility. I mean techinically I still have a licence for Pro Audio 9 but I can't run it with any of the gear I own now. No. Only people that make bad analogies

Awwwww man. I will no longer be able to laugh at my fellow TV composers they tell me how much they spent on their DAWs whilst mine is free. Mind you most of them have crazily overpriced Apple Macs so I can still laugh at that. 5yrs of CBB has been a good run. It was always going to end, I'm just happy that we have the return of Sonar - I hope the industry starts taking it seriously again as a major platform as we've seen our favourite DAW somewhat shunned, no longer mentioned by other manufacturers ( I have an Oxygen Pro keyboard here with a preset for seemingly every DAW under the sun except CBB ) and no longer appearing in Sound On Sound alongside the other DAW columns etc. Whislt I'm not interested in a streamlined DAW that looks to be what Next is I'm happy to pay for a new Sonar by subscription at the right price, it makes me laugh when people say they want to "own" it because you never do - it's just licence. Very much look forward to Cakewalk Sonar and if @Noel Borthwick is looking for beta testers for it then sign me up.

Yeah you can effectively achieve the same by auditioning a new arrangement that leaves out the uwanted sections I guess if you could make Cakwalk skip over an arranger section in the main track view it could be a quicker way to try stuff out than creating a new arrangement.

There isn't a midi cc paramter for slide. You normally have to use pitch bend.

They can be but Folders are more flexible. Imagine sending all your drum parts to a drum buss. You have some drum buss compression happenig that sounds great on the kick , toms and snare but it's ruining your cymbal sound and making them sound washed out. What do you do ? You take the cymbals out of the Drum Buss and maybe route them to the Master Buss instead. If you use busses as stems now, your drum buss is missing the cymbals. If you use folders as well you can keep all elements of the drum track together , route them wherever you need but also Export by Folders when you need stems,

Yes if you could jump between nodes with TAB and CTRL TAB and nudge them with the same NUM PAD keys as you can with midi note that would be helpful. I might also argue that most people can't hear a difference of 0.2db in a full mix so you may have overdone the automation. If you use a hardware controller instead of a mouse and shut your eyes as you ride the levels you'll likely make much bigger fader moves as the eyes tend to trick the ears.

Thank you.

Cakewalk should be right up there with the most popular PC DAWs , I mean come on. It used to be hugely popular and ...and it's FREE FFS. But they lost a lot of ground because of major ommisions like not having a dedicated sampler. The kids that make music now are using audio from Splice etc. and chopping it up. Hip Hop is the biggest music genre on the planet. If you don't cater for those producers they will go elsewhere even if it's free. So I don't the think the Export function working one way or another will make much if any difference to how many users Cakewalk can gain as it will be bigger more headline grabbing benefits that attract them.

I think I may have a year or two on you but I would have thought by now you would have learned. Don't expect the default system behaviour to be changed just because you have poor recall. Well they say mistakes are for learning from not repeating Yes I have to use other software too , I use Wavelab and RX but it doesn't make me forget how Cakewalk works. Cakewalk preceded Adobe Premiere by about a decade....so who's way is right ? Well I imagine it's most of us or we'd never get anything finished I probably use Cakewalk more than the average user but I've never felt delayed or cognitively burdened or I'd probably use something else.

Well it seems like a fairly simple midi buffer , if it doesn't affect those who wouldn't use it and the other DAWs all have it then it seems a sensble addition.

Exactly. Adding things is fine - Removing long established workflows - not fine I've had a couple of features added that I requested too, the lock button on the arpeggiator and I went to some lengths to convince them to add Folders to the Export Module Options which is a real boon for bouncing your stems all in one go. None of these affected any existing workflows and can happily be ignored by those who have no need for them.

One user's design flaw is another's established workflow. Personally I don't see it as design flaw , I see it as a RTFM situation. Sometimes when I buy a new car from a different manufacturer the reverse gear is in a different place. It might be push down and top left to find it...instead of pull up and bottom left on the previous car. Does this mean I should petition the manufacturer to change it because other cars I've driven do it differently ? Or should I just....you know..learn how to drive it the way it's been designed ? You misunderstood. I am talking about logical ( not lexical ) semantics " concerned with matters such as sense and reference and presupposition and implication " Well that is a shame , I export approx 1,000 files a year from Cakewalk and I can't recall the last time it didn't export what I thought it should. I don't use any other DAWs so I don't get confused between them working differently to each other. Maybe that's the key.

Technically it hasn't reinvented anything as it's always worked the same way.