azslow3

Don't hunt "excellently priced" old low-middle interfaces, till you need something special (like having 6+ analog inputs crazy cheap). That will not increase stability nor decrease latency... I am writing from experience (I have several still laying around, 2 in use... but I also have one "real" audio interface 😏).

Written million times, but in short: you may have 2 DIFFERENT general problems (one, another or both...): audio interface need "the next buffer" at the time it starts convert its samples into analog signal. The time is fixed. Absolute "deadline". No matter what is in the buffer, it should be there. Failing so produce cracks/pops and (bad) driver crash, up to interface (hardware) stuck. Any 10MHz DSP beats most "speedy" and powerful PC in that respect. The "power" does not really matter (except my 2x faster driving example... so can have "improving" effect). Reasons of failure there: system (hardware and related software) own "latency", they can simply "lock" the resources and so not allow delivering "in time"; badly written drivers, which fail to deliver even when the system allows. the buffer doesn't get the information you want. I mean it can't be filled with results from all your synths and effects when it has to be sent to the interface. Here the DAW, plug-ins, RAM, disk, so general "power" is required. Since "too long" processing in any plug-in will reduce the "speed". The reasons from (1) also influence (2), the processing can be "too long" just because CPU/memory/disk required for it was just locked by something else. But everything else is also relevant. Note that "CPU load" is not an indication you have/don't have these problems. Except when everything is at 100%, you know your system is definitively "underpowered". With good optimized system (and well written plug-ins... rarely the case...) you may have no problems at 90% or more, but on bad system you may experience problems with 10% (or even less). Cakewalk and all mentioned utilities don't really show you what the problem is. Latency Monitors are great to understand from where SOME problems MAY come, only sometimes they demonstrate from where the problem definitively come. So the only way to be sure is with your concrete project observe what is going on with real-time buffers (1) and what is going on with processing (2). And there is a way to see that, as I have pointed in my first post...

Xeons are server processors, they are designed to work at 100% continuously (assuming cooling system match it, and in ready-to-use towers it usually is). But if Throttlestop significantly improve something, check your Powerplan is correct (also listed). I personally prefer avoid Throttlestop and other "hardcore" tweaks, but it is one of good tools to see what is going on (even so it is not easy to interpret). Till you target latency toward 1-2 ms... not possible with your interface in any case... standard bios settings and Ultimate Powerplan should allow use your system reasonably. So, I repeat, check which bottleneck you hit and them target the reason. You know, an attempt to drive 2x faster can bring you to the destination 2x faster. But that is not the first thing to consider in case you have chosen 10x longer road 😏

If you really want optimize audio performance, and not "I will click here-and-there may be it helps...", you need to understand what is the bottleneck (for concrete system, with concrete project). For "clicking everywhere" approach, I have old but for most staff still valid "checklist": https://www.azslow.com/index.php/topic,395.0.html To understand what is the problem, search "Performance monitor" in my checklist. Once you know what you want/need improve/fix, you significantly increase your chances be successful.

I don't think you need video console... The only connectors are for Fairlight Audio Interface and 1x in each direction MADI (4x in each direction with extender). But I guess no PC will help you to get a single from 2000 Core Audio Tracks, you need a Mac... 😉

They always was. They exist like 20+ years, almost unchanged. But as you can guess, I had to have a good reason to write AZ Controller (MPK Mini was my first surface) instead of using or extending "standard" solutions 😉

There are also "standard" solutions, with "Cakewalk ACT MIDI" and "Generic surface"

I don't have TD-50, but even my simpler module works well over USB. Don't forget to use Roland drivers (even so it may work without). The latency of Roland Audio Interfaces is not the best in the world, but ok to play throw Drum VSTs in the DAW (even so you probably will notice the response is slower). MIDI also works fine in terms of latency, when connected throw quality MIDI input (I mean connecting throw "MIDI to USB cable" for $1 make no sense).

Search for GeneralMidiSMFs in: https://legacy.cakewalk.com/Documentation?product=SONAR&language=3&help=INI_Files.5.html

The proposal was to loop MIDI externally and hope SysEx will be delivered (Aux track recording was just to record audio, inside Cakewalk). I have quickly checked, but it seems like that does not work... Several applications can use ASIO, but only some drivers allow that (f.e. RME). Single application can't use multiple ASIO, that is an ASIO creator (and owner) decision. You can wait for Cakewalk implementation, try to use ReWire or other multi-app tricks... or just switch to another DAW with reasonable MIDI routing, find (or create) Ctrlr (or similar) panels for controlling and proceed with music creation. Cakewalk MIDI editing is nice, but (may be apart from Step Sequencer...) I don't think there is something significantly harder to achieve in other DAWs. MIDI routing and processing are definitively not in the list of Cakewalk advantages (only "workaround" style VST MIDI processing and simply no MIDI routing at all). With the DAW I propose you can: open your Cakewalk project and continue or ReWire / ASIO link Cakewalk to use both in parallel. Sorry, I don't have other proposals...

AZ Controller is not communicating with Mackie. You have asked it to control the same parameter and Cakewalk sent feedback to Mackie/iCon. That is not happening directly. So, Arturia -> MIDI -> AZ Controller -> API -> Cakewalk -> API -> Mackie -> MIDI -> iCon. You have controlled fader by controlling the volume (to control the volume of the second track, you need to select the second track in the Strip action for the second encoder).

I just can confirm when msmcleod has already written. Communication between different surfaces is not foreseen by Cakewalk, nor support for multiple MIDI inputs to the same surface. Mackie Control and AZController can do the internally, by only for other instances of themselves. But you can use AZController independently with the second surface, with Action list like "Strip <current>"+"FX (by position or name) (parameter by position)"+"Value (encoder)" for each encoder. In AZ Controller there is no separate INI for mapping (so no separate "C4 mapper" like utility), you assign parameters explicitly within preset (but with this approach AZController technically does the same as Mackie Control with INI). If you want follow track/bus focusing, display currently controlled parameter and value somewhere, implement several "banks" of parameters etc., the preset for AZController will be a bit more complicated (but possible to make).

I was doing exactly that in my test, but for some reason MSSupertLooper was not getting sound. Well, as I wrote, probably I was doing something wrong (or just hit some bug after changing settings without stopping transport... I remember that was "no go" for CW all the time I was using it... ? )

I have tried that, these are inputs. And Cakewalk with some plug-ins support sidechain inputs, so they are shown. I have not managed to get the signal there, but may be I was doing something wrong...

(N)RPNs are implemented using CC numbers you have trouble with. You drive MIDI "throw" plug-ins, when plug-in is capable to use (N)RPN, it will most probably block CCs you mention. But that can be plug-in setting.

6,38,98,99,100,102 (also 96, 97) are used for (N)RPN messaged (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NRPN) If something (plug-in) works with (N)RPN, it will not work with individual CCs which are used to implement them. Cakewalk always was not flexible with MIDI routing. But let be realistic, how are you going to use 3 banks of the same finite controls directly to MIDI, so without catch, even if you remember what all these controls are? ? Well, you can assign CCs from different channels. As long as target interpret them channel dependent way, with that you can avoid assigning "reserved" CCs.

All depends what you want to do, preferences, and the type of the track. In general, you can turn off echo for current track with: Strip <Track> <Current> <Inp. Echo> Value <0> (or <toggle>) For MIDI tracks you normally use "automatic echo" on strip selection ("A" on echo button). With Preferences option MIDI/Playback and Recording/Always echo current MIDI track you just need to select the track to echo it, deselected track echo will be auto-disabled. So you don't need to manipulate Echo/Mute for previously selected track (and really you can't when the option is set). For recording, just check you have "Allow MIDI Recording without an Armed Track" enabled (in the same preferences section). So mentioned Actions make sense for audio tracks (f.e. a button to toggle echo for mic or guitar) and in exotic situation for MIDI tracks, when auto-echo can't be used. PS. unlike ACT MIDI and keyboard assignments with CAL scripts, AZ Controller support feedback (f.e. turning LEDs on controller). So if you plan to use AZ Controller, MIDI controllers with LEDs have advantages. Also note if you don't want/need MIDI controller, AZ Controller also support gamepads and phones/tablets (with OSC apps). The last option can be used for feedback only, f.e. to show the name of current track on the phone (useful if you play away from monitor). It can even speak the track name when you change the selection, useful when you are away from monitor and don't want other display ? PS.PS. "MIDI-Shift" with MIDI assignments is used to inform Cakewalk you use a key for control, f.e. with left pedal as shift you can send 88 commands from 88 keys keyboard. But there was more then one reason for me to write AZ Controller instead of using existing possibilities. BTW you can mimic the behavior in AZ Controller (with unlimited number of Shift/Ctrl/etc. modifiers).

Or with AZ Controller (www.azslow.com). After installation (there are videos) and following "Quick start" (https://www.azslow.com/index.php/topic,9.0.html), you will know how to map a button and what is the Action list for control. The action list for your purpose can be: Strip (Track, <First>, +0 or +<other track, counted from zero>) Function "Select strip" For more buttons, practical is "Dup" button on the Options tab. So you just need to re-learn MIDI and adjust "+X" to define more buttons. You can also do track name based selection. For that you will need to define "Software States Set" in the Options tab, like "Tracks" with States "Drum", "GTX", etc. And then adjust "Strip" Action for the button, changing "<First>" to "Tracks" and then selecting f.e. "GTX". That way your button will select "GTX" independent from the position it has.

It assumes synth MIDI learning is working, and in OP the problem it does NOT work. In addition it introduce yet another mapping (note "I don't use ACT control because it is a bit complicated" in the OP) and it assumes the DAW has good and stable working MIDI routing (Cakewalk tend to mess it). BC Remote Control has mentioned by you disadvantage... Finally, this plug-in cost almost the same as a DAW which can do way more tricks with controlling on its own and in more easy to follow way (since it can use MIDI and directly parameters, including modulating (also by audio)). With third party extensions or scripts it is possible to do even more crazy things there. ? Sorry, I don't say BC plugin is bad or will not work with Cakewalk, I just claim it is not going to help with discussed topic.

https://www.azslow.com/index.php/topic,206.0.html Some controllers show assigned parameters. NI Sxx controllers have displays for that (M32 has tiny display... it also shows current parameter and value, but it is hard to see). Mackie (and compatible) devices have per control displays. And for all controllers you may have a separate window which shows the layout (at least with "Cakewalk ACT" and AZ Controller). So if you have space on monitor (or a dedicated monitor.... or in case of AZ Controller a phone/tablet with TouchOSC or other OSC client installed...), you can have current "labels" for hardware controls.

Softube Console 1 is to control corresponding mixer strip. For "instruments", there are just 2 DAW independent solutions. For both you run the instrument in a wrapper. One is AKAI VIP and another is NI Kontrol. Both work with combined devices (keyboard + controller). AKAI VIP always was just "an attempt". NI Kontrol is well supported. Long time ago there was Novation Automap (with controllers without keyboard), but that line is not continued. All NI controllers use encoders, for me suboptimal for synthes (no "real" feel). But obvious advantage they are always "in sync" with parameters, so you can switch between banks/synthes without problem. If you don't really want the keyboard, there is M32. Even so it has 32 small keys, it has small size and can be used just as controller. They are almost optimal to control all NI plug-ins. Many third party plug-ins also have NKS support. But if you are serious about using Cakewalk and controller, I recommend as first to give your Launch Control a try with AZ Controller. After following "Quick start" (5-10 minutes), you will be able to use "a hint" from my previous post and have your device controlling one particular synth (may be 20-30 minutes for you). You can also try "Startup preset" (there is Youtube step-by-step video), to try "ACT Dynamic mapping" (another 15-20 minutes). After that, you will probably have the answers on following questions: are you really going to use controllers? do you think encoders will work better then finite knobs for you? do you want spend time making good for you layouts/presets or prefer "ready to go" solutions? And then you can start to think which other device to buy (or not...).

"MIDI learn" inside VST(i) is the thing of that VST(i). If you save the project, but the next time you load it the mapping is gone, that means the plug-in is not saving it. So you need to ask plug-in developers what is wrong, host (Cakewalk) has no influence on internal plug-in MIDI mappings. ACT in general is the only option if internal mapping is not saved by plug-in. ACT is using "Parameters" exposed by plug-in, not sending any MIDI to the plug-in. ACT "Dynamic mapping" can be tricky in terms of "remembering" the mapping (configuration XML files can be "corrupted") and focusing plug-in (you don't need it on monitor, but you need select it and "lock" it, then you can close it, focus other plug-in, etc.). An alternative approach is "Direct parameter control". But in your case it is available throw AZ Controller only (Cakewalk own ACT software use it exclusively for Mackie controllers). I must admit that peace of (my) software is not newcomers friendly (even so in practice, when you know what you should do, the mapping will take less then 10 seconds per control... The action list per control is "Rack <required synth> <parameter>" + Value (with default options for launch control), duplicate N times, MIDI learn and change the <parameter> in Rack action for each knob). The advantage over Dynamic Mapping (and MIDI learn inside plug-in) - you can control different parameters of different synthes/fxes at the same time.

Writing a VST3 from scratch is not an easy task... It is simpler to use frameworks, most common is JUCE: https://juce.com/ Also note that as long as you are (A)GPL compatible (your plug-in is open source or you don't distribute it to anyone), you don't have to pay and you don't need Steinberg registration. But in case you want make it close source, even if you don't ask money for it, you need Steinberg registration: https://steinbergmedia.github.io/vst3_dev_portal/pages/VST+3+Licensing/What+are+the+licensing+options.html and some license for the framework (JUCE is not cheap...). But may be you can do the trick with ReaJS (https://www.reaper.fm/reaplugs/ ). Then you can write processing (and GUI) using JSFX (https://www.reaper.fm/sdk/js/js.php, NOT JavaScript). Tons of scripts are already written. ----- But may be you are looking for Control Surface API, that is completely different from VST (and the only way really communicate with Cakewalk). Then you need https://github.com/Cakewalk ----- The only known Cakewalk API for VST3 is proprietary extension for ProChannel modules. It is not documented. There is no full scale DAW API which can be used from VST(3) plug-ins in Cakewalk (it is not REAPER...).

For this controller specialized solutions should work better then Mackie. Original or alternative.

On original Mackie MCU, there is "Control group" section (at least in Cakewalk layout), which switch between Tracks, Buses (AUX) and Mains. To switch from other devices, they have to send corresponding MIDI message (Note 76, 80 or 81). I don't know if Faderport send them (I don't have Faderport).