Jump to content

PhonoBrainer

Members
  • Posts

    2,629
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by PhonoBrainer

  1. PhonoBrainer

    mind mine

    Well who knows what issues need to be addressed on this one? Mix issues, I mean. What, did you think I meant something else? Guitar tones are nice and clear, and the vocals are guttural yet very discernable. It holds the listener's attention, no problem there. I'd vote for the kick on the left to merge with the kick which I think is on the right, if it's not a low tom right? Perhaps its too conventional for what you want to do here, I get that. Judging by this one, you are mixing things 1,000 times better than a year ago, it's a very clear mix so well done! cheers, -Tom
  2. Anybody know what day it is? These might be a nice addition to my Mark Harmon mutes.
  3. Sell the album just minus that one song, drop that from YouTube? I think your tempo is faster, if memory serves? I would think that would throw the AI off. Or just sell the Google song to . . . Google. There's your money.
  4. Please also let us know when Adobe and Final Cut have sales on tools that will make us win Oscars.
  5. Fun as usual, more than adequate song idearrr! Mixwise, whatever you are using for bass guitar (is it the lower strings on an actual guitar?) Is coming through a bit thick, maybe some eq notches in the bass instrument around 300hz would sling some mud out of the mix? Could be wrong, worth a shot. Digging it though! cheers, -Tom
  6. I do enjoy this! Bass is in a nice pocket. Kudos on the vocals, they kill when they are doubled. Allow me the first to make the complimentary Steely Dan reference. Glad I had the good headphones on for this one! Sweet pan moves at the end. Loved it! Cheers, -Tom
  7. I really enjoy using this, even though the midi export of patterns works about half the time. And wave academy has never issued an update, it's been years now. Sounds great tho.
  8. Great song as usual. Totally not a surprise there. Mixwise, superior tones all around. Love that bass performance, so locked in the pocket with the drums, and you have mixed the AD2 drum kit very, very, very well! Guitar tones are clean yet gritty, perfect. Your best pocket is in the chorus, and the pre-chorus. I think you might check the timing of the guitar that's playing that main riff, especially in the first half of the song. You might slide it back in time just a smidge, it might fit the groove better. As it is (check the first ten seconds) that lead guitar I think is coming in just a hair early. In the first verse, for me, the vocals might be drug back a little as well, but the guitar stood out as early compared to the groove more often. Again, it's the guitar riff part - all of the rhythms and other lead noodles are waaaaay cool. frickin' great tune. cheers, -Tom
  9. Bring it! Love the birds. The sonic backdrop is stellar. I totally zoned out. Marvellous. One mix idea is knocking down the violin a bit when it bursts forth, most of the time it's chill. cheers, - Tom
  10. Ah, close to running out of colors, I see.
  11. Oh Jeeze. Hopefully rescheduled soon.
  12. PhonoBrainer

    Yoga!

    I liked how it started straight and then slowly a shuffle evolved. Or did I imagine that? Sonically rather compelling, not sure how the house picture relates. The filters at the very end were fun! I don't t know how well the yoga studio would react to this lively number ? Thanks for the fun listen!
  13. Suh-weet vocals with bgv's. Maybe I'm naïve too but I don't find the lyrics that twee, and the chord progression seems different enough when you go to that minor chord, very nice indeed. I was hearing the bass guitar come in just a hair earlier than the drums on the beat? Might be worth a check, and the drums of course are super soft in the mix. You might just solo bass and drums, turn the drums up a smidge, how's their timing, is it together? That piano is also plenty busy with the little noodles, nice as they are. Your vocal however never leaves center stage, so nice and up front, I think it's perfect in the mix. Dude, I think it's a great song, I could hear people doing karaoke on a 70's night to this! cheers, -Tom
  14. Is "the sound of life" planned?
  15. Musicians friend had 15% off codes if you create an account there. That's the best deal I could find when I finally upgraded to omni 2
  16. Yea! I get a USB port freed!!! All cause I bought "Whistler", my only VSL library.
  17. Ditto this. Great quality and super easy for those idiosyncratic 80's tom rolls and such.
  18. PhonoBrainer

    Sandra Nye

    Yeah sorry, not a very super specific or useful observation I made! Breathing, as in a bit more upper end eq boosts to add some natural higher frequencies. But it totally matters what snare you are starting with. Is it a live recorded snare? If so you may not have a lot of good upper frequencies to work with. In that case you can play around with adding a clap sample when each snare hits, adding mostly just the upper eq of the clap hit (season to taste). If it's a sample from some drum vst, you might be able to swap that sample out for another that has more sparkle up yonder. Of course if you dig the snare as is, that's easier! ? I was hearing a cool rockabilly/ska vibe and those songs can have some crack on the snare sometimes. Cool tune, looking forward to hearing where it goes . . .
  19. PhonoBrainer

    Sandra Nye

    I listened to both versions, and the song is catchy with a nifty hook on that palm mutey guitar line. The second version is really getting there but you might get that snare breathing a bit more somehow. I think it's wonderful how you are unburying this song and giving it new life. Very cool indeed. cheers, -Tom
  20. He's now my favorite heretic and I hope he got paid. If he really really played that thing as only he could, the machine would be smoking in two minutes.
  21. Ore some old guy actually trying to comprehend Battery 4
  22. Glad I caught this. It's a great song and mixwise, it's unusual to hear such low-end clarity across bass, kick, and lower register guitar strings. Wonderful! It's kind of a crime not to have supporting bgv's on this. Really, really good!!! cheers, -Tom
  23. 2,000 samples per note. Again, 2,000 samples. Per note. Wtf? Even if that's across a few articulations, at a number of velocities, with a few round robins? Seems like overly deep. I dunno. Back to my cave.
×
×
  • Create New...