Starship Krupa

As a SoundSpot fan I can say that Nebula is absolutely worth installing if you're into messing with modulation. It's a creative tool, as in, when you play with it, you'll find things to do with it that you hadn't thought of. Plus it has the gorgeous SoundSpot UI. MSW2....just got it so I can't say. MSW1 is not a go-to width manipulator for me, but they say that 2 does stereo-from-mono as well as being able to set a lowpass and then mono-izing below the lowpass, a-la Boz' Mongoose. And it has a display that shows you what's going on. And the newer SoundSpot UI look. In my quiver, it's up against the Boz/Joey Sturgis CM one, which is a hard act to follow.

Can verify both feelings of happiness and consternation. Reverb is something I still don't have the best handle on, I'm not far past scrolling through the presets in the hope of finding one that sounds decent on my send bus. Just the fact that Phoenix has jillions of great well-organized presets with descriptive names puts it miles ahead of anything else. For instance, the first professional sounding reverb I got was TrueVerb in a giveaway. Have always loved the way the algo sounds, but it comes with only about a dozen presets with the usual "Medium Hall," "Drum Room," "Cathedral" designations, a complicated interface, and a thick manual that reads like someone's master's thesis.

Open Preferences and scroll down to the Workflow Impediments section and uncheck "Blue Sticky Finger Bar." You had that coming. I believe you're referring to the Inspector. Looks like you undocked it and it's floating around obscuring things that you would rather be inspecting. You can banish it by clicking on the little "X" in its upper right hand corner (not kidding this time, Cakewalk is a Windows app and I went an embarrassingly long time before I realized I could close the Inspector that way), or go up to the Views menu and unselect Inspector, or....well, there's no keystroke to show and hide the Inspector so you have to use the menu command.

Blue sticky answer. Duplicate post.

My favorite is BlueLab's BL Gain. Very simple. But as others have pointed out, Cakewalk does already have a channel gain knob on each strip. It's nice to have something like BL Gain around, though, because you can stick it between plug-ins if needed.

The OP isn't having problems with audio recording. They're getting an audio engine stall with an error message while playing a VSTi. Game audio is actually a demanding application for an audio CODEC, and the Realtek chip has a bit of a starting advantage hardware-wise by being directly connected on the motherboard rather than through a USB port. There is no practical reason that Cakewalk should not be able to play a violin sound through a given sound device without crapping out when a game can play an explosion sound through the same device without crapping out. In my opinion, unless someone is recording audio into their DAW computer, it is not strictly necessary to buy an external device which would be used only for sound playback. The biggest reason not to bother trying to use onboard audio facilities for DAW recording work is that the input is usually a flimsy unbalanced line level 1/8" jack. You'll spend all your time trying not to get it to hum, clip, hiss and cut out. But if you're not recording audio, and plenty of EDM and scoring music is made without ever touching a microphone, you don't need a fancy audio device. I have some suggestions for changing the settings in Cakewalk to help it not drop out when playing virtual instruments. Check in Audio/Playback and Recording and see what Driver Mode you are set to. Cakewalk only allows changing the buffers slider if you are in the WDM/KS or WASAPI/Exclusive modes, so if you are in WASAPI/Shared mode, yes, it will be greyed out. The best mode for running with a built-in sound device is WASAPI/Exclusive. You can achieve lower latency for soft synth playback in that mode, and you can also move the slider to set the latency a little higher to prevent Cakewalk from dropping out.

A tuner would be an excellent addition to the ProChannel modules. In the meantime, my favorite tuner plug-in is Meldaproduction's MTuner, which may be had as part of their Free Bundle.

Ah. I was wondering how the 8.5 stalwarts were feeling about Take Lanes after the recent retooling. Used to see a lot of complaining about the Take Lanes workflow vs. Layers(?) but that seems to have quieted down. Have Take Lanes improved or have the Layers fans just given up for good? So before ProChannel there was a conventional channel strip EQ that was replaced by the Quad Curve ProChannel module. I can see where you would miss that. The ProChannel is an extra click. Usually when I'm using it for simple HP/LP I don't bother to pop open the full interface. And how I wish double-clicking on the graph in the channel strip would pop open the full interface without having to open the ProChannel first. That's a sweet collection of synths. I just make do with a handful that AIR and iZotope put on deep discount. Hybrid 3, Iris 2, Vacuum Pro. I also have a bunch of A|A|S soundsets which I love, great for electronic/ambient. For orchestral sounds, Sonivox' great samples delivered in in crappy UI's. ? And of course whatever free loss-leaders a company is kind enough to offer.

Remember that while at least initially the forum regulars skewed heavily toward Sonar Platinum refugees (like you, I believe), Cakewalk by BandLab only ships with the Sonar Professional set of ProChannel modules. So no Concrete Limiter or CA-2A for instance. I started with CbB and therefore am missing a pile of the Platinum Suite plug-ins. All the high-end synths, for instance. Rapture, Dimension, etc. Ultimately, it's up to product management to decide what are good ideas to implement and what to wait on. Most suggestions would improve the program, if only for the person who suggested them. ?Although once in a blue moon we see something like this one guy who came up with the idea of putting advertisements in a splash screen because he was having issues with BandLab Assistant. His logic was, I think, the product of frustration. ? I did not hold back from telling him that I thought his suggestion was a poor one.?

Another visit from Annoying It Can Already Do This Guy: if you go into Preferences/File/Advanced and uncheck Allow Only One Open Project At A Time, you'll be able to open the project you wish to import the tracks from. At that point, you should be able to just drag and drop tracks from the source project to the target project.

To the righteously outraged: the ban was probably due to the petty authority figure in question getting bent out of shape due to Larry's buy and flip thread, not the ferreting out of great deals such as he does here. Still BS, because Our Master of Deals does adhere to the letter of the law, and I'm with him, why open multiple threads, if you want to know what he's selling, click on his thread. Doofus can't tell the difference between someone who wants to try out lots of plug-ins and recoup some of the cost of doing so and a "dealer," as if a dealer would go to all that trouble to sell a few plug-in licenses.? (Oops, good guess!)

I have no ready answer for this. It sounds like Cakewalk is sending a MIDI event somewhere that Cubase isn't. If you look in Cakewalk's Preferences/MIDI/Devices, what is listed?

Pluginboutique has one too. Egad, anyone who doesn't already have a set of sampled orchestral instruments, $20 for the entire Film Score Companion set is....well, if I didn't already have more licenses for Strings, Woodwinds, and Brass than I have computers to put them on, I'd do it immediately. I enthusiastically paid more than that for the licenses for just the Orchestrals, and you add to that the 11G sampled Steinway and 15G of percussion. Any one of the instruments is well worth $20. Just get it.

I notice that in the Piano Roll it works the way you describe, with a simple right click, so it looks as if something got botched. Do you know if this has been reported? If the behavior was changed deliberately or by accident? Did you notice the change with the very first CbB release or later? P.S. Regarding the business model, I've posted at length regarding my speculations, but think of Google Chrome and other freeware programs that tie into other products and services that a company sells. BandLab is a diversified company with many brands, and was already marketing 3 freeware DAW's before they acquired the Cakewalk, Inc. IP. The code was already mature and in place when they bought it (likely at a good price!). It's low overhead, the people who make up the staff are not in one big office, they don't take out big magazine ads, etc. They have larger plans for it that we haven't seen yet, I am sure. We haven't been told because you don't show your hand to possible competitors.

I heartily endorse this.

Sigh. That is a thing, isn't it? So weird. Otherwise, when I was DAW shopping so many years ago, I went with Mixcraft in part because I liked their forum. And I still do. Ask questions, people don't lord it over you, helpful without being condescending, very nice. But suggest something, anything, and it's like you kicked the hornet's nest. When I started using Mixcraft, the Undo/Redo command didn't show what operation you were undoing. Yikes! So I of course suggested that, and I got pushback in the forum. I pointed out that every content creation program I had used for the past 20 years had had that feature and still. Maybe it's because Mixcraft is such a good "starter" DAW, it attracts people who have less experience with how other DAW's work. And maybe they are attracted to niche software in other areas as well, so they don't care much about conforming to industry standards or what else is going on in the marketplace. And not to badmouth the company at all, I have the utmost respect for their attention to quality, but they too have their blind spots in certain areas such as keystrokes. So @kennywtelejazz, sounds like they tried to gaslight you about MIDI file preview and why it shouldn't or couldn't work the way you suggested?

Yes! Up above your list of products, there's a link for Offline Activation. It's kind of a process, I think you have to run each of them and generate a file, which you then upload to the server, which sends you a code, but do it, do it, do it. Especially for stuff like Dimension Pro and Rapture and Linear Phase EQ that BandLab haven't released.

Oh dang. I looked at your other thread and now I realize that this must be what Jerry is talking about. You can get the context menu, but unless you open it with Ctrl, all of those commands are greyed out. From what he says, I guess it didn't work that way in Sonar. Won't know until he reports back.

Jerry's troubles are with running Sonar Platinum. Is Noel going to be interested in a hang dump from Sonar? I've been trying to address his remaining issue with transitioning to CbB, which seems to have been taken care of, so all should be good once he gives it a look.

All I have are licenses for CA-2A and SONAR Home Studio, and I figured out how to download offline licensing keys and complete installers for both of them. Aren't such things available for SPlat-ters? If so, for heaven's sake people, download everything yesterday and get all your offline licensing keys ready to go.

What's the grouping situation with the clips in question? Also, yes, modifier keys are my friends when the Comp Tool gets too grabby. Shift, Ctrl, etc.

Compatible with Jamstix?

I merely wish to go on record as the first to refer to this vapourDAW as.... Music Tripe

Nobody is going to come up with the "definitive perfect DAW for everyone." Nobody (at least nobody in their right mind) is trying any more. We can't look at the music and software market of 2020 with 1997 glasses any more. It's not about becoming or challenging the Industry Standard, it's about carving out a significant enough niche. You're talking about which current DAW's are going to "disappear" if Behringer's vaporDAW ever becomes a reality. Look to the recent past. In the years, yes yearS, plural, since BandLab have had Cakewalk on the market with the freeware subscription license, how many DAW's have failed as a result? People make music in their homes, in small studios, using the tools that feel best to them. Many more people have computing devices and know how to use them, are comfortable with using them. They're used to using media creation software. The market has grown, it's way, way larger, and it's not about what's in all the "professional studios." The DAW that used to be a thing that people used to record and edit audio is now something that is used to compose or create pieces of music out of various pieces that could be samples, MIDI files, loops, live performances. Some programs are stronger in certain areas than others, some programs have idiosyncratic workflows that appeal to a solid but not dominant following. Companies don't have to "own" the market in order to survive if there are now 10X the number of users of DAW's than there used to be. Remember all the wild speculation about what a "game-changer" it was that the mighty SONAR was going to be free as the wind? The "little guys" like Mixcraft and Mu-Lab and Tracktion were pretty much doomed, weren't they? Well, I guess if you like the way that Mixcraft works, as a primary tool for an important hobby, it's still gonna be worth throwing $35 at an upgrade license. I'm saying a lot of things off the cuff here myself, but I'm curious where you are getting that impression about the market being "controlled by a wannabe mindset that needs the most expensive thing that all the famous producers use." Kids you know personally, forums? It's not my perception beyond the usual human herd mentality, everyone always wants what the cool people are using, be it a Strat with a Floyd, a Jazzmaster, whatever tool/toy the people we want to be like are using. Hey, the old Cakewalk forum from early 2018 is on the phone, it wants its obviously well-considered armchair quarterbacking about the software industry back.? I was explaining this kind of thing all the way back then when certain people were just baffled at how a multinational music gear and software company that was already comfortably marketing 3 freeware DAW's (iOS, Android and web-based) and whose established business habits included acquiring and rehabbing famous respected American musical trademarks, and who had multiple other revenue streams and whose principal was the quite personable and switched-on scion of one of Singapore's most successful entrepreneurial families, could possibly survive if they were freeware licensing a zombieware Windows DAW they probably didn't pay terribly much for in the first place. How could it possibly be expected to work? ? BandLab would surely go broke, Cakewalk's quality would surely suffer, because how will you cover the development and support costs with no licensing fees??? Y'know, like how Google failed and their Chrome browser did so poorly in the marketplace because they didn't charge people to use it. Remember? Oh wait, no, they are one of the most wealthy and powerful companies in the world and Chrome is the most popular browser. Hmm. Wait, no, Google has other revenue streams, and Chrome integrates with and promotes them really well. Maybe Cakewalk could be doing something similar for BandLab. Maybe the amount of cash required to keep Cakewalk afloat with the devs and support working in decentralized offices is small enough that just the word of mouth and brand awareness by itself makes it worthwhile. Like how Tostitos pays many millions of dollars to put its name on a college football game and gets paid zero from the ticket sales, yet they keep doing it because it's good for the brand. One kid makes a zillion-seller using Cakewalk and mentions it in an interview and right there is enough brand recognition to pay for the whole shebang.

Oh snap (to note), and since you're a Staff View user, that's one area that has received bupkis in the way of enhancements, so you have less incentive feature-wise to go with CbB. I do suspect that it would address your stickiness issue, though. I promise you'll dig it! I'll personally refund the price of your subscription if you don't think the latest Cakewalk core is an improvement over the last Sonar core. ? To get on the same page with you (although I mostly use Staff View only when I want to print notation or tab), I just called up Staff View and right clicked in the middle of the staff. I get a context menu with 4 sections. The first has Layout, Regenerate Tablature, and Export to ASCII. The second has commands for MIDI plug-ins and quantizing, the third has the fancy processes like Deglitch and Transpose, the fourth has the Fit to commands. If that's the context menu you're talking about, it works with my Logitech Mouseman Marble and my Logitech M305 wireless, and I didn't touch my Ctrl key. When I right clicked holding the Ctrl key I got the same menu. When was the last time you tried CbB to see if they'd corrected it? There have been what, something like 15 updates since BandLab took over? Maybe you got used to something else during the Gibson ownership, but these guys go after bugs as if they had taken their little brothers' lunch money. If this solves both of your issues and lets you use the new program, then I'm really glad I brought it up. Good luck.