Promidi

Looks like it. ATM, 4 Studio to 5 Studio is US$149 Maybe try to 30 day trial of 5 Studio. Just hope it does not bork your Installation of 4 Studio. Might have to wait for a sale.

Which version of Melodyne Studio?

I am thinking the OP did see it, tried to log on with the web browser that opened, but it would not activate. Hence the SOS.

In the forum release notes for 2023.09 Build 75, the bakers said that “Version 2023.09 will likely be the last update”. Notice the word “likely” This means that it is unlikely that there will be further updates. However, not impossible. Again, 2024.02 will LIKELY be the last update. Also, 2024.02 will still require activation. See

Note: total of 413GB.

One other issue I have found with track templates is this. If I have a track template with MIDI track routed to a plugin (say to a wah pedal in TH3 or IKM’s Amplitube), the MIDI routing gets lost when the track template is reloaded. Recipe: · Create a SIT with a VSTi · Place an FX plugin in that track’s audio FX rack and enable that FX’s MIDI in. · Create a MIDI track and route that track’s MIDI out to the FX’s MIDI in. · Use the FX’s MIDI learn to create a MIDI mapping from a controller to parameter. · Confirm that moving the slider on the MIDI controller changes the parameter on the FX. I save both the SIT and the MIDI track to a single track template When I insert that track template, the MIDI routing is still present. However, moving the slider on the MIDI controller no longer changes the parameter on the FX. The work around is to turn “MIDI in” on the FX off and on again. Then re- route the MIDI track’s MIDI out to the FX’s MIDI in. After doing that, moving the slider on the MIDI controller changes the parameter on the FX. I have tried this with VST2 and VST3 version of the FX plugin. I have also tried is with other manufacturer’s FX plugins. Same result. This only effects Track Templates. Saving as a project or a Project Templates does retain the MIDI routing to the effect.

Instálelo inmediatamente después de reiniciar la PC. Tenga en cuenta que el método preferido ahora es utilizar el Centro de productos de Cakewalk. https://discuss.cakewalk.com/index.php?/topic/69413-cakewalk-product-center-version-100051/

Slight correction. Windows itself allows multiple ASIO devices installed. Any one Windows program itself cannot have two ASIO devices selected therein. (Which is why the OP's Focusrite ASIO was greyed out in CbB) If you have multiple ASIO devices, Cakewalk can use use one ASIO device. Another program (ORB Studio for eg) can use only one of the other ASIO devices. The two programs can run at the same time using their respective ASIO devices. The only stipulation is same sample rate, bit depth and (I think) buffer size for all ASIO devices.

These days, the currency can be hard drive space..... Even at $US48, the 288GB part is a bit expensive.

Same here.

Just tried it and I am not seeing that behaviour here. Can you give us more information? Are you sure you’re using track FX not clip FX

Which is what I stated.

Ah, that’s why I couldn’t find it in the manual (yeah I know, I actually read the manual). I was searching for the phrase “invert selection” or something like that.

One bug fixed that effects me is that with CbB, MIDI chase did not include any aftertouch events. With Sonar, it does (both Key and Channel). Also, the ability to set a default instrument when you add a SIT is handy too. But as you say, YMMV.

Bringing back some more colour options in Preferences would be nice. Many have been removed in Sonar that are present in CbB.

What happens if, with the selection as shown, and the Smart Tool enabled, while CTRL is pressed, you right drag a marquee around the notes you want to invert the selection of? I tried it here, and indeed, this did invert the note selection within the bounds of the resultant selection marquee.

I have to agree there. I spent a long time making my theme in CbB just how I like it. I would hate to have to give it up - which, it looks like, I will have to.. (The Bakers did say that the new Sonar would not support theming).

At what part of the installation does the error message "This software requires installation of the intelLok(R) device drivers and a reboot before running..." appear? Are you sure “This software” is refering to Cakewalk by Bandlab? If Cakewalk by Bandlab is scanning your plugin folder, and it comes cross a plugin file that requires iLok (or “intelLok” , then I believe this message would appear. There is definitely a file on you PC somewhere that is generating this message. Start looking in your plugins folder. It will ether be a DLL file or (less likely) a VST3 file. Try C:\Program Files(x86)\Steinberg\VstPlugins or any other VstPlugins folder. I can categorically guarantee that Cakewalk by Bandlab itself does not need any form of iLok to install or run.

7.5 seconds from shortcut click to product list appearing here (PC config as per sig). NA 3.90

Update via Izotope Product Portal Updates & Improvements CHANGED Minimum supported macOS version to macOS Monterey ADDED iLok Enterprise support ADDED Support for macOS Sonoma ADDED Support for Cubase 13 and Reaper 7

Interlock? Wasn't this a precursor to iLok? I have never seen CbB needing any form of iLok or Interlock. Check in Control Panel, "Programs and Features" (Start + run appwiz.cpl ) to see if you have any old plugin installed. There must be something on your PC causing this that is outside of CbB’s control. Note: Windows 10 has a known incompatibility issue with really older iLok drivers. They causes a blue screen (even in Windows safe mode. Some older SONiVOX plugins were known to cause this. The only way out of that one (short of a full Windows clean install) is to boot from a CD Windows repair software and change “TKPD.sys” driver from “boot” to “disabled”.

Feels a bit intentional...

What!!?? You didn't rename it instead?

I don't see any ads on YouTube thanks to uBlock Origin.

Another thought I had is that a higher tier of Cakewalk might actually include Roland Canvas VA. Of course, there would have to be some negotiations with Roland to allow this, and what the licence fee from each sale of Cakewalk Sonar to Roland would be.