Jump to content

apt

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by apt

  1. On 2/13/2024 at 12:51 AM, msmcleod said:

    We've added a new feature to the new Sonar that will allow you to create Articulations that delay notes either positively or negatively ( +/- 1000 ) in either ms or ticks. You can also decide whether to include a note's end time in the delay, or retain its original end time.

    Using articulations rather than a track-wide setting allows you much greater flexibility.   For example, orchestral strings with a slow attack playing legato could have a negative delay on the start time but when you switch to pizzicato, there is no delay.  You could even have different delay times for different octaves if required.

    For simpler cases where you want everything on the track delayed, just draw the articulation over the whole track duration.

     

    Thank you very much! We finally will get this feature in Cakewalk/Sonar! And I'm also excited for the great flexibility!

    Could you please also consider adding a track-wide setting? That would be very useful for those who make orchestral templates. Many instruments just need a constant delay time. With track-wide delay setting, we can just add the delay in the templates and don't need to draw an articulation every time. (Drawing articulations in a template could make it messy)

    Many thanks!

    • Like 1
  2. I'm glad that more and more people are requesting this. :) And thank you Bakers for trying to make this feature available!

    What makes me think it's possible is that many other DAWs, such as Cubase, Studio One, and even Reaper, have this feature, and they are all good to use.

    I don't know how they implemented this feature. But maybe you can take them as references.

    Many thanks.

     

  3. My PC is offline. Now, every time I open Cakewalk, this pop up screen appears and cannot be closed until it counts down to 0...

    QQ20240206175124.thumb.png.1e07d305bad1c25a7e4a181d7df2f87f.png

    I think it's meaningless that I have to wait 20 seconds every time :(

    I know if I'm online I will not see this, but my PC is not able to be online most of the time.

    Is there a way to disable it?

    There are also many other people encountering this:

     

  4. On 11/3/2022 at 1:40 AM, Morten Saether said:

    You can use quick grouping to replace all instances of the same effect in all selected tracks. To do so, hold down the CTRL key while choosing the replacement effect. In order to also replace plugins found inside FX Chains, hold down CTRL+SHIFT.

    Thanks for the update!

    But it's kind of weird that Quick Grouping only works on that new feature, but not on other "more basic" operations on effects, such as plugin on/off, rack on/off and deleting plugin.

    image.png.4569563f5efaa39008881be0200ed90e.pngimage.png.38e3ac1d54ea38d3fe4464d5ae92adba.png

    • Like 3
  5. 12 hours ago, Esteban Villanova said:

    In the meantime this free plugin can be used for negative delay: https://dmgaudio.com/products_trackcontrol.php

    Thanks for sharing! That is a good temporary solution.

    However, such third-party plugins all have a big problem in Cakewalk - they also delay the "input monitoring" signals of the tracks that don't have a nagative delay. This causes a very big latency when recording notes by the keyboard :

    That "Live Input PDC override" option doesn't help. Because it also bypasses the PDC of the existing MIDI data on the recording track, causing that track playing ahead of other tracks...

    So we still hope that Cakewalk can add this must-have feature ASAP. Studio One has just added this in their version 5.2 or so. Now almost every other DAW has this feature!

    Please consider adding this! Many thanks!!

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  6. 19 hours ago, Mark MoreThan-Shaw said:

    I bounce all my orchestral libraries to audio when I'm nearing completion and eyeball the Waveform to get them in the best place.

    You surely can fix all the latency and any other imperfections in the stage of mixing... But nowadays most DAWs have that feature, so many sample libraries now have a quite noticable latency, for several hundreds of milliseconds, in order to get more realistic sound. It is very annoying  to compose and program with that latency, isn't it? :( 

  7. I'm glad that someone else also found it necessary...

    I made this request last year, and I believe there were several requests for this in the old forums many years ago. But unfortunately there's no official reply yet :(

    I'm an orchestral composer and have been using Sonar/CbB for over 10 years. Cakewalk has so many great features that can make my workflow efficient. But it's truly disappointing that this necessary feature has not been added into Cakewalk for so many years, while almost every other modern DAW has it...

    I think many people don't know there is a feature like that, and how much it can speed up their workflow. Therefore not many people are requesting for it...

    @Noel Borthwick @msmcleod Dear Bakers, could you please consider adding this necessary feature for orchestral composers? Thank you very much!

    • Like 1
  8. Could you please consider adding this feature to CbB?

    I think this is a necessary feature in modern composing workflow, and many people including me rely on this so much... There's even a sticky thread in the VI-Control forum titled "Negative Track Delay Database / Spreadsheet"...

    Many other DAWs, like Cubase and Studio One, can do this. I really hope to see this feature in CbB!

    Many thanks!

    • Like 1
  9. 1 minute ago, Terry Kelley said:

    Well, you've posted it in the feature request forum so let's see what the developers say about it. They seriously entertain useful features and improvements.

    Thank you for discussing with me! I've been using Cakewalk for nearly 10 years. I've tried several other DAWs but Cakewalk just fit me best. xD There are only a small number of things which I think could be better.  So I decided to post some FR's and bug reports hoping to help make Cakewalk better.^_^

    • Like 3
  10. 1 minute ago, Terry Kelley said:

    At some point the faders need to be faders and not amplitude modulation at a fast rate. But you are certainly free to want them to act in a specific way. Noel's point about processing load is valid (in my opinion) and should be left to a plugin.

    One of the reasons why I posted this thread is that, this feature is already avaliable to the free-hand tool while drawing envelopes. It's just been introduced in the 2021.6 update:

        image.thumb.png.32f1f77229a87dbb39357a307db4db96.png

    So I think processing load also shouldn't be a problem. Anyway, it's not a bad thing to let smoothing be an optional process and give more freedom to the user, isn't it?

    • Like 1
  11. @Glenn Stanton @Terry Kelley

    Thank you for the advice! 

    But, not only faders can do modulations. Actually I use a breath controller. Recording vibrato with a breath controller is a common thing. It gives much more humanity to the resulting sound.

    I think this "limit" is truly not necessary. It narrows the use of automation in the level of software. IMO, "Real-world faders cannot move that fast" shouldn't be the reason to do this limitation in a DAW. It would be better if this can be decided by the user.

    • Like 1
  12. 27 minutes ago, Noel Borthwick said:

    This is completely normal behavior. What you see when drawing is just a preview of the mouse drawing nodes. The actual recorded automation removes redundancy nodes but the net effect will be the same with fewer redundant nodes because they are converted to curves.

    There is no  reason to have extra nodes and they would use excess CPU.

    Thanks for the reply!

    But usually it removes so many nodes that the recorded envelopes are not accurate, especially when you want to record "vibrato", or some complex, detailed modulation to the synth. 

    I really think it would be better if we can choose to save or not to save CPU. And this feature is already added to the freehand envelope drawing.

    I use "manual" vibrato a lot and also make EDM in Cakewalk.  This is an important feature and I really hope to see it in Cakewalk.

  13. Could you please also add this feature to "automation recording" and "convert MIDI CC to envelopes"? Now the envelopes are always automatically smoothed a lot, and the smoothing cannot be turned off.

        image.thumb.png.61f876fcb11a6f65699e8b46ccfca499.png

    I've mentioned the issues here:

    Thank you!

     

  14. When I record an automation envelope, what I actually draw is something like this: (this is what I see while recording)

    image.png.99da35f279bd78174764626f48bd1de2.png

    But when I stop recording, I get this.

    image.png.885b56f3b7a0a00841ec5842766e9052.png

    It seems that Cakewalk always does a lot of "trunc" to the recorded envelope.

    Usually what we want is like the first image. I have searched a lot but it seems that there is no solution for that yet.

    So my request is a switch (maybe) to turn off the "trunc" process and just leave the recorded envelope alone, or an option to change the "resolution" .

    • Like 1
  15. In many sample libraries it requires a "negative delay" to the midi track (e.g. -100ms).

    For example, using Strings Staccato, there is an "attack" before the "rhythmic start point" of a note. If you simply set the sample start to that rhythmic start point, it would be unnatual. The only way to both keep the piano roll tidy and hear the notes in rhythm, is to apply a negative offset to the midi track.

    But it seems that the "time +" in Cakewalk's midi tracks is by "midi time" (ticks), not by ms.

    image.png.29235ce63c5a051f7c9efc45f2cc3876.png

    In most cases, it's okay to manually convert ms to ticks according to the tempo. But if I have severe tempo changes in the project, the absolute time offset would not be consistent.

    For example, this is a tempo change cueve which is common as a transition between two sections:

    image.png.32a39a1390d4b760d7eea93d65ac4839.png

    If there's a midi track with time offset by ticks, and you do this, the notes that begin at the 8->120 jump would come out much earlier than expected.

    In Cubase and many other DAWs, you can apply an absolute time offset to midi tracks.

    Hoping to see this feature in Cakewalk.

     

    • Like 2
  16. 14 minutes ago, bitflipper said:

    OK, got it. I'm thinking in terms of how I use tempo changes, which are never that severe. It's not just MIDI-driven synths that are affected by fast tempo changes; tempo-synced delays also have problems. So I generally avoid them. On the rare occasions that I do need a drastic tempo shift, I'll build the ritard into the performance and leave the tempo alone. Again, it's just my own way of doing things - all my MIDI parts are played, rarely hand-planted into the PRV.

    But regardless, the answer is still no, you cannot specify offsets in fixed time intervals. Seems that would introduce CPU overhead as the DAW continuously recalculated the number of ticks required to maintain a consistent absolute time. Tempo resolution can be as low as 3 ticks, so you could be recalculating offsets 320 times a second -assuming you haven't changed the number of ticks per second.

    I'd be looking at why MIDI timing offsets were needed to compensate for a sample library in the first place, and if there might be another way to approach it. Many synths let you change the starting point for sample playback, for example.

     It's true that this feature is somewhat not easy to implement... But what made me post this thread was that Cubase and many other DAWs can do this. Maybe I should make a feature request...

    As for why it is needed... For example, using Strings Staccato, there is an "attack" before the "rhythmic start point" of a note. If you simply set the sample start to that rhythmic start point, it would be unnatual. The only way to both keep the piano roll tidy and hear the notes in rhythm, is to apply a negative offset to the midi track.

    Anyway, thank you!

×
×
  • Create New...