Kawika Posted June 17, 2021 Share Posted June 17, 2021 When using a guitar plug-in and echo -on, there is a very short delay, almost imperceptible, but there. Easiest to hear when I can hear the guitar acoustically and the plug-in sound at an even level. Where or what would be the first place to look to correct this? thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsinger Posted June 17, 2021 Share Posted June 17, 2021 The first place to look is the audio IF. Are you using asio and is your asio buffer as small as possible while still being stable? I normally run at 96 samples, but if I shutdown the lan 64 is stable. Roundtrip latency in CbB is reporting 9.8 msec at 96 samples. Some plugins have more latency than others - linear phase can be pretty bad. Start with no plugins and tune your system and see if it's ok. Then add plugins one by one and see if one is particularly bad. People have different ideas about how much latency is acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scook Posted June 17, 2021 Share Posted June 17, 2021 Yes, audio interface buffers and plug-in delay compensation are the two largest contributors. Fortunately, these are things the user has control over. Except for WASAPI shared which is fixed by the OS, the audio interface buffers are set in preferences or, in some cases, software provided by the interface manufacturer. For 44.1/48K sample rates most find 128 is the largest usable buffer size although some can work with 256. Plug-in delay compensation is determined by the plug-ins on the track/bus requiring the largest buffer setting. If the track with the largest PDC requirement is not the track being recorded, bypassing the effects will reduce the PDC. Since the track being monitored requires FX, the global FX bypass in the Mix Module cannot be used but, individual FX rack/PC module bypass is available. Also PDC may be overridden on the live track using the PDC button in the Mix Module. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 17, 2021 Author Share Posted June 17, 2021 Thanks guys. It is ASIO (Goliath interface). I decreased the buffer in Cakewalk Driver settings to fastest. I will see if that helped. The roundtrip is 3.9 ms 170 samples. Clicking the ASIO Panel states: Safe mode engaged (which makes a big difference in output latency). Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsinger Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 If the buffer is too small you may get clicks and pops. So you may need to make the buffer a little larger depending on whether or not you've optimized your computer for audio performance. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Fogle Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 @Kawika, where are you plugging in your headphones? The current Goliath audio interface has two latency free, direct monitoring, headphone jacks. Generation 3 Goliath HD Audio Interface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 18, 2021 Author Share Posted June 18, 2021 Thanks rsinger. I'll be watchful. Jim, No I was not using headphones. I have wondered about the zero latency for Goliath, as it is printed on their hardware. So it is when monitoring via headphones (good to know)? I think I'm good now: just sliding the buffer all the way to fast worked (from RT 23.3 ms to 3.9 ms). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsinger Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 9 hours ago, Kawika said: Jim, No I was not using headphones. I have wondered about the zero latency for Goliath, as it is printed on their hardware. So it is when monitoring via headphones (good to know)? I think I'm good now: just sliding the buffer all the way to fast worked (from RT 23.3 ms to 3.9 ms). Zero latency is also called direct monitoring - you hear the input to the audio interface, not the output from the DAW so you wouldn't hear any plugins. Glad that worked. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 18, 2021 Author Share Posted June 18, 2021 I may be getting greedy, as there are no issues, currently, but I was wondering : I have 2 buffers chosen in "buffers in playback Que".....and after clicking ASIO Panel I noticed I am in the "safe" mode. Should I keep both as is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsinger Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 (edited) I don't know the answer to that. I have 2 buffers chosen in "buffers in playback Que". The various asio drivers I have don't seem to have a safe mode option. If you want to get greedy you can use higher sample rates. The higher the sampling rate the more samples there are per second so the same number of samples are smaller units of time. Depending on your current sampling rate you could try going up to 96k hz or 192k hz. Edited June 19, 2021 by rsinger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 22, 2021 Author Share Posted June 22, 2021 Thanks on the higher sample rate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 24, 2021 Author Share Posted June 24, 2021 Hi, Back on a quest for least latency. On my antelope Goliath there is a choice between USB and Oven. I don't know if this is relevant to latency, but I noticed with Sonar I was able to use "Oven". With BL it kicks back to USB (and then back to "oven when I'm out of Cakewalk (on youtube for example). Does anybody know what "oven " means in this context? thanks, Kawika Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Base 57 Posted June 24, 2021 Share Posted June 24, 2021 (edited) 13 hours ago, Kawika said: On my antelope Goliath there is a choice between USB and Oven. I don't know if this is relevant to latency, but I noticed with Sonar I was able to use "Oven". With BL it kicks back to USB (and then back to "oven when I'm out of Cakewalk (on youtube for example). Does anybody know what "oven " means in this context? I have an Orion 32+ and I asked Antelope support about this a couple years ago. I forget the technical reason they gave for the difference in the display but the bottom line was to just ignore it. When the clock display shows "USB" it is still using the internal (Oven) clock. In addition, the clock source will have no effect on latency. For lower round trip latency, get a thunderbolt card. With USB the lowest I can set the buffer is 128 and that is with small projects. With thunderbolt I can set the buffer at 64 and still run a fairly large project. For me that is all just experimental. My front end is all analog so I don't care about latency. I leave the buffer at 512 and run all the channels and FX that I want. However, round trip latency should have no bearing on the latency of the hardware FX in your Goliath. On 6/16/2021 at 11:30 PM, Kawika said: When using a guitar plug-in and echo -on, there is a very short delay, almost imperceptible, but there. Easiest to hear when I can hear the guitar acoustically and the plug-in sound at an even level. My interface does not have the guitar FX that the Goliath has but it does have some fantastic sounding EQ's and Compressors. So if I run a Bass through a channel on the Orion with comp and EQ and then blend it with the direct signal in my analog mixer there is a very small delay. This just the nature of digital audio. The higher the sample rate is the less noticeable the delay will be. Edited June 24, 2021 by Base 57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfssongs Posted June 25, 2021 Share Posted June 25, 2021 I never monitor off any onboard effect when I do an audio take. All of my guitar effects are before the input and that is where I monitor. If your machine is kind of old as mine is, this is one possible approach. The negative is that the effect is baked in and can't be taken out. On the other hand you could monitor the effect & record a dry out then put the effects in later. I realize this is kind of a low tech solution but it works for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 25, 2021 Author Share Posted June 25, 2021 (edited) 3 hours ago, rfssongs said: Yea, I have done a lot of the following: "you could monitor the effect & record a dry out then put the effects in later." And, trying to get away from that. I do have Thunderbolt, so I will try that. I know they, Antelope, were working the bugs out of the TB-software for the initial Goliath. So TB makes a big difference? Oh and thanks for the "oven" info; appreciate it. I think the key, the exact question (for Antelope) is stated in the Cakewalk help module when you hover over the input echo "Many audio interfaces have an option to do this (input monitoring) automatically at the hardware level." thanks! Quote Edited June 25, 2021 by Kawika Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Bone Posted June 25, 2021 Share Posted June 25, 2021 If you find that temporarily bypassing all effects makes a noticable difference with latency, that means that one or more of the effects loaded into the project, are introducing enough latency to produce noticable lag between playing a note and hearing it. (the FX button on the right of the Transport Module, acts like a toggle, to have all effects either engaged or bypassed). There are some types of effects that are meant for mixing, rather than use in tracking/recording. Linear-Phase effects, which were noted in an earlier post above, and also convolution reverb effects are both notorious for this. A couple of quick and dirty workarounds are to either: Bypass the effects until done with recording and moving on to mixing, or temporarily swap out the effect(s) that need larger buffer sizes to process properly (convolution reverb and linear-phase types), with less resource hungry equivalent effects (different reverb plugin or non linear phase effect), until done with tracking, and then swap the other effects back in, where you can mix with a giant ASIO Buffer Size without needing to worry about the lag in playback, because you are no longer trying to play notes when the lag is present. I hope the above makes sense, and that it helps. Bob Bone 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitflipper Posted June 25, 2021 Share Posted June 25, 2021 ^^^ Well said, Bob. Input/Output buffering isn't the only source of latency. Some plugins necessarily introduce large latencies due to the way they work, and should be applied only after tracking is complete. If you need to add another track late in the mix process, that's the main reason the Global Bypass feature is there. Btw, the reference to "oven" comes from having interface clock circuits literally placed into a warm box to prevent the oscillator from varying due to heat changes. This makes the clock frequency very stable, and is the reason internal clocks outperform even very sophisticated external clocks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 25, 2021 Author Share Posted June 25, 2021 Thanks guys, but I'm not mid-project and therefore have the luxury of experimenting with min variables: Just one track with a midi instrument or one track with guitar plug i.e., S-gear. How do I monitor via the interface thus not engaging the input echo as stated in the Cakewalk help module when you hover over the input echo "Many audio interfaces have an option to do this (input monitoring) automatically at the hardware level" ? thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Base 57 Posted June 25, 2021 Share Posted June 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Kawika said: How do I monitor via the interface thus not engaging the input echo as stated in the Cakewalk help module when you hover over the input echo "Many audio interfaces have an option to do this (input monitoring) automatically at the hardware level" ? This is done in the Goliath's Control Panel. Use it's routing matrix to route your guitar input to one of the FX and then to one of the mixers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawika Posted June 25, 2021 Author Share Posted June 25, 2021 Hey B57, Route to one of the FX?....Even though I'm not using an Antelope Effect? thanks, Kawika Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now