PhonoBrainer

Fun song! Freddy welcome back, if you ever left! You have clearly slapbacked the crap out of guitars and vocals, and I'd say it works. So it's a period piece, welcome to 1959. Very cool that way! I hear the early Beatles ripping this one up. I'd say stellar period-correct guitar work, and thank you for tuning them first. Occasionally, in the back end of the chorus, you have simultaneous slapback going, on vocals, bgv multiples, and guitars. It kind of collapses the frequency spectrum into something narrow-sounding. Do you hear that? Is that "overload" what you are aiming for? Maybe so! The verses are clean, clear, and fun. I think this is one of your better tunes, and you have totally nailed the time machine here. Well done! cheers, -Tom

Your version of this is just great. I think it all hangs on the vocal, and your voice is quite good! Just some opinions from random internet guy: 1) Get to the piano/drums a verse earlier. It's very powerful when they come in, why make people wait? 2) There is an autofocus thing going on with your camera, it's not timed to the beat, and it's distracting and detracts 3) Your visual presentation is great! ( knit cap, glasses, darklit in studio - it looks good!) but the video over the course of its run time is too static. What about some cutaways with some slow dissolve transitions to some nice clips that support the mood? River flowing, a clock tower, dolphins in space - any video or even motion images that support your mood? Seriously, probably not dolphins in space. Your voice is I think perfect for this stripped down version, and tonally how you've captured the guitar is very pro sounding to my ears. The other instruments are great as well. Just take the video itself to version 2.0 . . . I really liked it. cheers, -Tom

Love that main riff. I'd vote for the middle funk kit, only because that snare in the "rock" kit is kind of 2-D and samey. Might be improved with some different processing. I think that "funk" snare is good to go. cheers, -Tom

This is a really cool song! The girl's bgv could come up a little. Can hardly hear it. The strumming guitars down just a bit. Your vocals, yes, up a tad. I like the chords, the piano parts, both elec and acoustic. I like the lyrics a ton. Has a really "up" feel. There are spots where you intentionally break out of the "British Dance Hall" stomp rhythm, and shift for a measure into a traditional 4/4 . I think this breaks the magic you are creating . . . hard to describe . . . 1:37 is an example . . .. could just be one listener's experience. I don't think Landr crushed anything, but hard to know without hearing the "before" picture. If you are happy with the raised noise floor on your bass instruments, lower guitar notes, and bass notes on the piano, then good to go. I'd like to hear your next mix update! cheers, -Tom

I liked the experiment and call it a success. The part two thirds in felt like it could even crossover into hip hop. That said, 8:30 felt a tad lengthy for what was on offer, nice though it was. Blame my short attention span then! cheers, -Tom

Hey Bjorn, nice one! If you didn't mention Scotland, I would have put this in the American West. So I reckon, there's overlap there. Very cool melodies throughout. At :21, I think your guitar wants to change that chord? I dunno. I like how they all go away, and come back! cheers, -Tom

I don't see the link either. Will check back.

I listened to "Bitter" and that's a cool guitar arpegg riff. The mix was really outstanding. A pleasure to listen to. Vocals are a treat. Very fine! I'd comment more, but Life Gets In The Way. cheers, and good luck with the album! -Tom

nice and weird. I liked it a bit more when the drums were minimal, fwiw. The bigger snare sounded too normal and didn't fit the rest of the proceedings. Jesse brings the fun. cheers, -Tom

Thanks for the translation! Very enjoyable, and I prefer those lyrics to many of the more English English ones' I've heard.

Great start. I'll stay tuned. Agree about the hi-hat. I like the descending chords of the "chorus" . . . the main 4 chords in the "verse" are I think kind of expected, don't know if you feel like switching it up a little there. cheers, -Tom

This sounds '80's plus very modern. Love that combo. When your vocal gets to the word "tight" in the lower register, the volume dips on it just a bit. But I can still hear it. The second verse, the snare and all it's perfectly-crafted swoosh! is just as loud or louder than your vocals. But, I still get it. Great tune, mellow vibe, nice break at the end, and a killer mix. Plus a great lead vocal and bgv. This is a winner. cheers, -Tom

Anthony, great piece here. Epic in all the right spots, tension that builds and is released. Mix sounded great. What was the product - insurance? dentures? a Sham-wow? Whatever, very likely their product is unworthy of your fine composition. cheers, -Tom

Sweet Smooth Slow Bossa Strat Nova. Where's my sangria? Love the changes in this. Very clear lead guitar tone. Don't know if you could feature another solo lead instrument other than that guitar all the way through, tasty though it is. Nice one! cheers, -Tom

David, thanks, I know you have discerning tastes, glad you liked it! Dan, many thanks. Hopefully, after a little more cleaning up, the end of this jingle is near.

Mix clarity is great, very sparkly but that bass fills the down low just great. I hear Imogen Heap. So that's sort of like Paul McCartney You have a good voice and the ear candy is way good. Nice mix of the modern with the acoustic guitars. Got any English lyrics? My Urdu is sadly non-existent. cheers, -Tom

James, yes please I could use help with editing out the 1940's hiss on those exposed vocal samples. I have dropped the high eq as low as I could, without killing the vocal.I don't have any "noise reduction" or such fixing plug-ins, denoisers, whatever they are. Maybe that's the next step for this. Thanks for the comments! I'll check out PSB . . . Daryl, thanks and good call on hi-hats. Generally I edit the drums last, and the early push-out was, guess what, minimal drum attention. Time to take a whack at it. And I can't carry T. Dolby's Suitcase, because I'm an Airhead. Love that guy. Thank you, I love you, goodbye. Steve SPAK, thanks so much! The "skills" are mostly high pass filtering everything to above 200 - 300hz, and even the bass gets hpf to above 50-60 hz. Pan crap around a little. Then post it and get good suggestions and hope you randomly wrote a good tune for once. DKirby, thanks for that. There's still some mud down in the mix and the drums need some love, but so far so far. I can't get in to those posh bars or clubs, I don't have the threads. But thanks for the compliment!

What was the 59th version like? Hey, just trying out some of these discount emoji. Plural of emoji, emojii? Your tune is cool and swirly. What's on the master bus? For me some elements are getting smooshed into a two-dimensional plane. Is there a "glue" compressor or something? I dunno. Is there a master bus eq that's removing the highs with an eq? I listened on headphones, and definitely appreciated the panning. Glad to know there are others with 60 versions. Is there less fancy master bus processing on version #15? might be worth a revisit, just to check. Anyway, very nice flow of a tune here. For fun, the next Soundcloud song of yours was "The Promise You Made" - great tune, and mix depth aplenty. A good reference I think for "Flurry68" . . . cheers, -Tom

Inventive and cool in the lyrics department. Love that "U2" style guitar break, but your vocal compilations give it a full originality. Listening on headphones, I wanted a bit more width in the mix, especially in the first couple of minutes. Later on, the panning seems to fill out a bit wider. Perhaps that's my imagination? Just love the originality of this. Authentic songwriting methinks. cheers, -Tom

Johannes Sebastian Cottrell! Enjoyable from the get-go, nothing wrong with the composition or arrangement. You are getting some good advice on string upgrades. Welcome to spending money! There are some forum folk here who really do the symphonic stuff at a very high level, hopefully they can offer you some good advice. One idea - it's a chamber music piece, but I don't hear the chamber. Feed all of those tracks into one chamber reverb preset, don't go crazy with long decay times, and high-pass filter the reverb so that the reverb plug-in isn't returning anything below 500 - 600 hz. Worth a shot. cheers, -Tom

Duuuude! You are famous! That's way cool you sent that in. I used to subscribe to "Recording" and always liked the reviews of people's work. Judging by the studio picture up on the "Recording" website, you have invested some $$$ on room treatment, and I can really hear a clarity in your vocal track that didn't necessarily used to be there. I liked the organ filling quite a bit. The bass guitar is pretty dry, which I think generally is a good call, but here I might want just a bit of delay, room, or chorus. Or not, could go either way. The mix pretty much sparkles. I liked that buzzy panning synth, maybe louder on that when it's featured? cheers, -Tom

Oh my. Can't believe you pulled this off of cassette. Those guitars are played and mixed great. Vocal performance is way cool, I'd push it up in the mix, and for the love of god, push those cheeseball 80's synths down a little. You are frightening the millenials. Perhaps my strong reaction is because I was a keyboard player in an 80's band and I know all those satanically insipid waveforms all too well. The ending has a restart beat? Might check that. Yep, authentic warmth for days, mixed well. Very nice job saving this one! cheers, -Tom

I'm a fan. The second half of the intro, maybe add a organ/B3 noodle to make a longer intro more relevant? I like the guitar tones for their guts and realness. The mix works for me, but it's not cohesive in the reverb dept, as in "Is everyone in the same space?" - that would be not really. It's studio treatment, where the singer has slapback, the drums have a bit of natural stairwell, the guitars are up front. I'm OK with that if it's a good song and vocal performance. Which, this is. Your vocals are good, the vocal arrangement is sweet spot all the way, and the toe tapping factor is 9.9 out of 10. Ending? some beat got skipped? And the last three seconds are the noise floor being compressed up? You might look at that. Is this an album that's already baked and in the can? cheers, -Tom

I'm not watching this: . . . or am I?

Then, most likely, you're also not in Oklahoma, Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, or Southern Minnesota. Too bad, its often very nice there!