-
Posts
2,009 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1,030 ExcellentAbout Shane_B.
- Birthday 05/11/1971
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
The base/default speed for ram on the system I'm looking to build is 5600Mhz max. I can't find 5600 with a decent latency but I did find 6000/CL30. Can the 6000 be safely underclocked to 5600 and will it negatively effect latency?
-
Shane_B. started following Poll, sort of , Do you use a plugin or phase align manually? , rip jesse colin young and 4 others
-
Do you use a plugin or phase align manually?
Shane_B. replied to jesse g's topic in The Coffee House
I've never understood the purpose of phase alignment or how to implement it. Probably should have paid attention during DAW class I guess. Is it a track by track, bus, or master thing? I know my best mixes have always been on all analog, and there's no phase thingamabobs on it, so I never looked in to it on my DAW. -
I looked up his neck of the woods but I can't tell if it was touched by the wildfires or not. He may have had to relocate or is busy helping others with the recovery if it did hit his area. Or the reduction surgery took a toll on him and he's still in recovery.
-
Nice circumvention there Craig. 🤠
-
One of my favorite albums is Song For Juli. Rip.
-
Ain't seen him around in a long time. Last I heard he went in for ***** reduction surgery. Darn thing was too big. Haven't heard from him since.
-
No I didn't. That's weird. I never got a notification there was a reply to that thread. I will check. Thanks for letting me know!
-
End of Windows 10 Leaves PC Charities with Tough Choice
Shane_B. replied to kitekrazy1's topic in The Coffee House
Candy Crush and Angry Bird players would beg to differ either you. 😁 Android is an open source operating system. You can even customize your cell. Apps such as banking require certain security programs running and they will not work if you do though. I work on point of sales systems. Those touchscreen machines they use in restaurants and bars and retail stores. All the ones we sell and service run on Android. -
Still haven't found a solid answer. What I have found is, in the price range I'm looking at I can't find a single mobo that has all the same gen pcie slots and it makes sense after really reading up on it. PCIe 4 has gpu and 1st m.2 slot shared Gen 4, and any others are Gen 3. Gen 5s have shared Gen 5 gpu and 1st m.2 slot and the rest Gen 4. So, what I'll do is get Gen 5 so it's a little future proof for future gpu's and use the Gen 4 m.2 slots for drives. I can't imagine any of it really matters. I've never had a single issue running anything DAW related on my old 6700 except for having to freeze Ozone from time to time.
-
End of Windows 10 Leaves PC Charities with Tough Choice
Shane_B. replied to kitekrazy1's topic in The Coffee House
I recently saw somewhere that they are not backing down on the new hardware requirements, but you can keep it running past EOL by paying MS to keep the security side of it updated so you dont get hacked. No more bug fixes or new features, but you can pay to keep the security side of it up to date. I saw it mentioned in a pc builders youtube video I was watching and I've never heard of that before. So, I don't know if it's true. -
Here's a question I can't find an answer to. If you have a PCIe Gen 5 mobo, you only get one Gen 5 GPU slot and one Gen 5 M.2 Drive slot. The rest are Gen 4, if the mobo even has more than one m.2 slot. The Gen 5 GPU slot and the first Gen 5 m.2 slot are shared and have direct lines to the CPU. If there are any other m.2 slots they are Gen 4 and have their own processor. On every PCIe Gen 5 mobo I've found, if you have the Gen 5 GPU and first M.2 slot filled (Gen 5), your CPU lanes are split between the two slowing them both down. My question is after explaining all that lol, If you have a PCIe Gen 4 only mobo, a Gen 4 GPU and a Gen 4 m.2 drive, does it still get split, or are both directly connected to the cpu equally? I can't seem to find an answer anywhere.
-
I've been doing a lot of reading on these Gen 14 cpus. I definitely don't want to go with the new Ultra cpus. The cost/benefit factor doesn't add up. From what I read they run on a lot less power, but are barely faster than the Gen 14's. I'm leaning toward the i7 now. It has the same amount of P cores as the i9 and faster, which is what's important for daw's. Three interesting things I've read. 1. One of the problems with Gen 14 was bad chips that oxidized on the inside. That's been fixed. 2. All BIOS's overclock them even when set not to. You have to manually set them up and you have to do it immediately. Once they run for a while at the wrong settings they are permanently damaged. That wouldn't be a problem for me because I never overclock and always go in and manually override the cpu and memory swttings to base specs. 3. You can continue to safely use Win 10 after it's end of life. You can buy security updates yearly for it but you only get security updates. No new features or bug fixes. I have an RTX 3060 12GB video card. I only play one game and not very often anymore. I like Fallout. A 3060 is overkill I think for DAW ussage so I think I'll be very happy if I go with the i7. I see no need for the i9. I'll mainly use my PC as a DAW, Word and Excel, and very very light gaming. I do just fine with the light photo and video editing I do with my current i7 6700k so I think I'll be in good shape with the i7 14700k.
-
I posted this in the proper sub forum but didn't get a response, so I'll try here. I'm just beginning to research CPU's seriously for the first time since I built my i7-6700k based system. Its not supported by Win 11 so its time to start looking before Win 10 reaches the end. I see the new Core Ultra chips are the latest, but the benchmarks I'm seeing are basically showing the i9-14900k's are almost equal performance wise and cost far less than the top Core Ultra. The 14900k is older now though. Is there any reason not to consider it for a new build? Ozone 9 Advanced really struggles on my 6700K. Will I see an improvement on a 14900k? Thanks for any input.
-
I'm just beginning to research CPU's seriously for the first time since I built my i7-6700k based system. Its not supported by Win 11 so its time to start looking before Win 10 reaches the end. I see the new Core Ultra chips are the latest, but the benchmarks I'm seeing are basically showing the i9-14900k are almost equal performance wise and cost far less than the top Core Ultra. The 14900k is older now though. Is there any reason not to consider it for a new build? Ozone 9 Advanced really struggles on my 6700K. Will I see an improvement on a 14900k?
-
I'm more of a Down By The River kinda guy. More heartfelt. Less commercial.