Jump to content

Soundwise

Members
  • Posts

    943
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Soundwise

  1. 6 minutes ago, Zo said:

    lol @Soundwise was chilling until we fukkk ed up the thread Carlos ....lol she was like "ok guyz , here we go !!!"

    Thks @Soundwise just tested it , it need more meat so 'im tweakin g but at least i have the riff !!!

    It's not a DI riff.  It's processed with the preset. I can make a DI for you. Won't take long, :D

    • Haha 1
  2. 5 minutes ago, Carlos said:

    so there is no truth here

    Exactly!

    22 minutes ago, Zo said:

    You made me try the bad boy and it is indeed better (soundwise ) than the marshall specailly with the 1960 cab

    My demos had expired long ago, so I had to judge by listening to the online reviews. Well, now that I purchased the BST100 license and tried the plugin with Celestion IRs - it's just what the doctor ordered!

    FWIW, I still doubt the MRH810 tracks will have good separation in the mix. At least, easily dialed in.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, Zo said:

    be sure to check Plini from neural dsp !! it has depth and natural tone with a precision that is rare !!

    I don't see a point in checking something overpriced. Sorry, unless they have some sales, I won't even look there.

  4. 20 hours ago, Marshall said:

    It’s you I have to thank Christian, for putting me onto it.  I love my S Gear, but try as I might I CANNOT dial in that clarity across all frequencies and crunch combined that I get from the Nembrini. 

    Nembrini amps undeniably boast the highest details, clarity and response. But, summed together, all these factors make your guitar sound wooly and mashy in the mix. This may be due to the Choptones IRs. Gotta give it a try with other IRs and compare with the real tube heads/preamps I have.

  5. 1 hour ago, Marshall said:

    Well I think I’ll  have to jump on the MRH810 at $27...Only one amp, but it is a really good “next gen” Marshall. 

    Interesting. I'm not impressed by the demo. How do you know it's good?

    Nevermind. It's not the droids tones I'm looking for.

    • Haha 1
  6. When I bought MCabinet hoping it to be a regular IR loader with 6 slots for IRs, I was very surprised and upset it's not what I expected. I requested a refund, but the good folks at Melda refused, saying, "you should've demoed it first" and "we don't do refunds for already registered licenses". So I decided to give this plugin a try and guess what - it's super useful! Now it's my goto virtual cabinet, coupled with Celestion IR library I have. I get excellent results, much better, than what was possible with normal IR loaders, including the WoS.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Great Idea 1
  7. 4 hours ago, abacab said:

    I have found no way to see what sound is assigned to each pad, in each percussion patch, without playing through the range of notes assigned to the kit. Without some sort of drum map I have no idea what I'm working with.

    This Sonivox offers many nice to great sounding instruments, but the poor UX turns people away from using it. The only Sonivox VI I have no complaints about is the Eighty Eight Ensemble piano. All other libraries are ruined by poor programming. What a drag!

    • Like 2
  8. 4 hours ago, Zo said:

    the guy does direct A/B with HW , and he prefered (me too) the HW BUT i started to analyse the plugins and found that i would have certainly equalise the HW aqnd this would have led me super close to amp sim lol also cabinets is all

    That's exactly what I meant by saying, that AT4 is mix ready. 😀

    • Like 1
  9. 8 hours ago, ensonced said:

    ReValver 4 (and 3.5) are pretty good, with RV4 I usually only use the ACT Amp clones as apposed to the other included content, it's kinda like TH-U's Rigs thing except better to my ears, you do need to purchase the ACT Combo module, about $40, but the amp packs themselves are only about $3 each. But I don't fire up ReValver very often, and it's let down a little by it's FX, not as comprehensive or good as say something like Amplitube, which I don't use that much either. Pretty much own everything Amp Sim wise (don't like demoing, would rather purchase and have all the time I need to access, and the ability to revisit any time I feel) Don't think much of stuff like Thermionik, the new Nueral DSP and STL stuff, it's ok, but.

    With regards to things like pick response etc, it's a bit like Clint Eastwoods quote about opinions being lioke a certain part of the human anatomy, some people say ReValver will have it, some will swear Thermionik has it nailed, some will say S-Gear etc, personally I can't say I notice any difference myself, don't notice it particularly lacking anywhere, maybe it has to do with set up, input levels whatever, I don't know, but it's never been anything that has stuck out for me, and by how different people will have different opinions on it, perhaps it's in the air somewhere, as long as your happy with what you use that's the main thing.

    Interesting. Zo asked about my personal experience, I replied and gave my reasons. Don't you think it was rude to generalize my response and compare it with a stinky little hole?  I mean, unnecessarily rude. Yes, some people are more sensitive to the outer world and others are less, to the point they can't tell false from in tune or even black from white. We all are different. Peace!

  10. 11 hours ago, Zo said:

    i understanbd so let's do it like this , witch amp sim waoh'ed you the most at first play and then after honey moon ... (sorry to bother you i'm asking this to all my Gtr friend around lol)

    Did I mention ReValver? Most amp sims sound great nowadays. But only RV4 responds to pick attack like the real thing. Oh, almost forgot! STL Tones (former Ignite amps) make some great stuff. Too expensive for what it offers, but honorable mention nonetheless.

    • Thanks 1
  11. 50 minutes ago, Zo said:

    So you think revalver is better than the chandler ?

    You can try ReValver and see if you like it. All modules are available for demo. Only real limitation is that you can't save your settings for modules that are not licensed. RV4 has a spectacular power amp emulation. It is fully functional with free amps that don't require any purchase.

     

    55 minutes ago, Zo said:

    i want usually from clean to crunch  not crazy drives  

    Full ReValver has lots of great cleans. Even free amps are very usable for that purpose.

  12. 42 minutes ago, Zo said:

    might get le the Chandler

    I have it. AFAIK, the original amp is designed with power amp saturation in mind, which is not the strongest side of most amp sims, including BX (Nembrini) plugins. Only ReValver has got it right. GR5 is close, but not spot on. All other developers use some simplified approximation of power amp impact on the overall tone and feel.

     

    21 minutes ago, Piotr said:

    Alisa, Indeed you are not helping 😛

    Now I desire it even more....

     

     

    • Haha 2
  13. 9 minutes ago, Zo said:

    you knbow its luxury when you buy a bass amp to route you synths in lol

    Jon Lord loved guitar amps!

     

    11 minutes ago, Zo said:

    just got me Bassdude for 5 $ , i'm starting to love this PA sub ...people are selling Pa plugins all over the place

    $5 or $25? Have they got rid of their license transfer fee?

×
×
  • Create New...