Jump to content

dcumpian

Members
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dcumpian

  1. I still use EWQLSO as well as HW strings, because they complement each other quite well. In many ways, even though HW Strings was touted as "next gen", it really fits as more of a part 2 of SO, because the articulations are so different. Both the brass in SO and HW Brass are really well done also.

    However, like you say, I have Ra, Stormdrum, and a few others I can't even remember. I never use them anymore unless I absolutely can't find what I'm looking for in a Kontakt library.

    Dan

    • Like 1
  2. I've used Cakewalk since it was called Twelve Tone Systems. After trying Studio One post-Gibson collapse, I find it hard to justify going back. Sure, there are things I miss, but stability is important. I didn't have a lot of crashes with Platinum, but that was mostly because I had learned over the years what not to do. I treated my DAW like a live explosive, and this relationship worked well for years.

    A lot of the issues that Cakewalk still has really boil down to the way the audio engine interfaces with Windows devices. It is very picky about how a device presents itself, and sometimes counter-intuitive settings will make it work great, until you get the white screen of death and lose something you were working on. CTRL-S is your best friend.

    Dan

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. 14 hours ago, Brian Walton said:

    There can be major differences between plugins in terms of the way they use resources.  

    Try Putting Waves' Abbey Roads Reverb on 20 tracks, do the same with B-Reverb or Rematrix.  Chances are your computer can't handle Abbey Roads, but will have little issue with the Overload pro-channels.  Same basic effect, reverb.  

     

    As for the OP, the Fly out EQ in the PC seem to be very efficient, use them on every channel all the time and don't see big spikes in the resorurce manager.  

    For every plugin where the PC version uses less resources in comparison, there are others that will use less than the PC versions. None of the PC modules are real resource hogs, but if you find that you run into issues, there are simpler EQ's and compressors out there. Once you start down that road though, the PC holds a lot less appeal since you will have plugins scattered all over your tracks.

    Dan

  4. Could be that, could also be stretching artifacts. There are various rendering settings that can improve the quality of the sound. Also, it isn't always necessary to stretch the audio to fit when you use Audiosnap. If you don't stretch the audio, there are no artifacts at all.

    Learning how best to use Audiosnap will take you some time as well as trial and error.

    Dan

  5. Maximum loudness that still allows for conversion to MP3 is right at -.3  That gives the MP3 conversion algorithm a little headroom to work without clipping. However, this level is only good if you have a hard limiter at the end of the processing chain to catch anything over that. A soft limiter will still allow the occasional transient over your set level and that may force you to set a lower level.

    To really get loud mixes (no judgement), it is best to use a clipper (like GClip or KClip) very gently to raise the overall volume before adding a limiter. Finally, never let a single limiter push the volume all the way to the final level unless you are already really close. Instead, stack limiters in series such that each limiter only pushes overall levels by 3 to 4db. That reduces artifacts and "pumpiness".

     

    Regards,

    Dan

    • Like 1
  6. Using AzCtrl, you can enable the transport keys in CbB. That is, unless NI has changed the protocol. It used to be based on the Mackie MCU. I have a MkI S88 that works fine, but I stopped updating the driver when 2.0 came out because I had heard there were issues.

    As far as Komplete Kontrol (KK), it should work. KK is simply a plugin that acts as a VST host. The A25 should be able to communicate directly with KK. For simple parameter controls without loading KK, you can just use midi CC learn to change parameters.

    Dan

  7. Tapsa's got the right idea if you want to build this out as a complete piece, start to finish. There is no shame in writing whatever moves you and deciding later whether it is a verse, chorus or needs to be broken down further. These sorts of happy accidents really are gifts and are a ton of fun to work with.

    Really great start here!

    Dan

    • Like 2
  8. 1 hour ago, Starise said:

    I don't know how you can stick with a project for so long and not get frustrated with the progress causing me to think you are probably one of those methodical thorough types who checks and double checks everything twice. This is actually a great quality to have and shows here in this work. The only thing that bothered me about the mix was the violin didn't seem to be coming out enough. Congrats on this!

    Thank you Tim! Yeah, about 5 years ago I decided to stick with a single song project until it was complete or I toss it altogether. I used to jump from song to song and I ended up with a ton of unfinished crap. Sticking with one song at a time keeps me focused even though it can sometimes be a struggle, lol.

    Dan

  9. 16 hours ago, Kuusniemi said:

    Very nicely structured and a fun journey!

    I have only one niggle and that is that before the beat comes in the compressing/limiting bite a little too hard on the track. There are spots that sound a little crushed (just very minutely). I would let the beginning go a bit more natural than it is now. :)

    Thank you! I used a pusher to get the overall track up in volume before I did my normal finalizing. I think the pusher can get grittier than I'd like and that may be what you are hearing. I usually use GClip/KClip but wanted to try the pusher instead because I do like some of the added harmonics. I just need to play with it some more to really wrap my head around how it works.

    Dan

×
×
  • Create New...