SteveC

I don't think that's the number of plugins but an error code related to loading that SSL plugin.

1 hour ago, Nikita Kapernaumov said:

the main problem is PRV notes' quality of getting almost transparent when not in focus

I thought there was a way to adjust the saturation level for non-focused tracks in the PRV, but if so, I sure can't find it.

Just to add - even if you don't actually need them, using the Note Names option can help delineate where back-to-back notes start (green in the image).

On 1/3/2024 at 1:12 AM, noynekker said:

I believe the freeze feature will always freeze the entire track, with the intention to unload the soft synth and free up some CPU / Latency.

I think that's accurate.   But it sounds like you just want to bounce a section, not freeze the entire track?

You can bounce a section/region of a soft synth, but that requires a split instrument track so that you can record the soft synth's audio track while playing back that section (in real time).  Or, you can route a single instrument to an Aux track, then record the Aux track while playing back that section. 

On 1/4/2024 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Sasor said:

On 1/3/2024 at 10:29 PM, Starship Krupa said:

Re-skinned VST versions of the sonitus fx suite would be yummy as well. There's still Cakewalk IP that BandLab paid for that is (so far) going unused.

There's some plans in the works for some of this, obviously I can't give any details at this time.

Interesting...

Huh... last month I opened a few old *.wrk files in CbB.    Talk about forward compatibility!   🙂

If it's a plain MIDI track simply point its output to the virtual instrument (it should be in the list).

I'd check track lanes to be sure there isn't something in there that's not visible at the parent track level.

On 8/24/2021 at 3:51 AM, scook said:

Reactivation may also be perform without having the DAW connected to the internet as long an there is another machine with internet access, see http://www.cakewalk.com/Documentation?product=Cakewalk&language=3&help=NewFeatures.040.html (this does require BA)

This link seems to work.

On 7/5/2021 at 12:45 PM, Nio Sebez said:

Good job, I like!

Thanks, Nio!    Appreciate it.

On 4/20/2021 at 10:36 PM, Ruralrocker2010 said:

So, obviously you love Kansas, right? Great tune! 

Why yes, yes I do.          Big fan from way back and Kerry Livgren was always an influence.      Thanks!!

Try trimming the (copied) clip before looping it.  

Hmmm... kinda sounds like acoustic jazz techno to me.    😉    That was just... cool.    Layers coming in and out but never busy.   Ya got something here. 

On 4/9/2021 at 6:29 AM, Makke said:

Agreeable music. Liked the melody lines and nice arrangement. Great work!

Thanks, Makke!   Melody is so important so I really appreciate that. 

On 4/8/2021 at 1:24 PM, emeraldsoul said:

Crazy good prog. I'd boost the vocal just a hair, especially that "response" vocal part. Wow those piano runs at the end were killer! Video works a treat. Kudos to the bass player or programmer for keeping up with all of those changes - love it!

 

The typical knock is that prog can get tedious but yours never, ever does. Really well done!

cheers,

-Tom

Thanks, Tom!    Yep, overall vocals bumped up a bit and the response vocals up a bit more too.    The piano runs were just having fun, though that fun did need a little clean-up here and there.   And the bassist says...   thanks!      Fortunately I knew the changes so could keep up.   I may not be a "real" bassist but I'm still heavily influenced by Chris Squire none the less. 

Appreciate it.  I often have a somewhat short attention span with my own songs so like to constantly mix it up.  

On 3/31/2021 at 2:01 PM, jack c. said:

wonderful job recording song/chord changes.bring up voices.jack c.

Thanks, Jack!   I just uploaded a revised version with a slight bump in the vocals.  Appreciate it.

That was really cool...    Solid groove with a catchy melody/lyrics and some quality playing.  And yeah, the instrumental section was awesome.  Loved the visuals too, they kept up nicely.

OK, that was really enjoyable.   Funky, futuristic, retro, cyber - yeah, it's all there.    Y'all got a great sense of humour and it comes through in both sound and video.   You could almost say it's in your DNA...    🙃

Nice...   the sparseness really worked well to help convey the overall feel of the piece.   Very effective.

I like it!   Spacey, yet the furry paws are groovin'.    👍

FWIW, I've used Sennheiser HD280 for years, but they're falling apart so bought these Status 'phones during that last sale.   Personally (isn't it always?) I found them to be a very suitable replacement at a great price.    And they're comfortable, with a detachable straight cable that I find more convenient.

I don't visit here much, but for whatever reason felt the need...    thanks for posting Bapu, and RIP Bill of the Bayou.    Long time poster and great sense of humor.

On 3/31/2021 at 10:39 AM, KurtS said:

OMG! This must have been a lot of work to put together. Great playing, that's a lot of notes.

Thanks, Kurt!   Yes, it did take some time to get everything down.    And yes, there are a few notes in there too. 

On 3/31/2021 at 7:27 AM, Wookiee said:

To me progressive means it is is not mindless pop, it means someone has taken the time to construct a real well thought out piece with more than three chords, or not just I, IV, V.

I like this is a piece worth listening too, nicely done sir. 

Thanks, your Wookiee-ness.    Yep, same for "progressive" here, or at least that's what I shoot for.   I'm glad you liked it.

On 3/29/2021 at 6:15 AM, Bajan Blue said:

A bit of Yes meets Jethro Tull - nicely done indeed

Cool

Nigel

 

Thanks, Nigel!  Hadn't thought of Jethro Tull but now I will...   😉