Jump to content

Craig Anderton

Members
  • Posts

    874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Craig Anderton last won the day on September 11 2023

Craig Anderton had the most liked content!

Reputation

1,357 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm not familiar with the 1820, but see it has ADAT I/O. If all you need is more inputs, you can feed the ADAT out from the "expander" interface into the ADAT in of the "main" interface. Sync the main interface to the expander 1820 (it should be the master clock), and you 'll be good to go with ASIO drivers. I think Windows WDM can aggregate interfaces natively, although there may be a little more latency than with ASIO.
  2. ...for at least a while longer. One by one, programs are removing ReWire capabilities. And while this doesn't matter for Sonar, there will likely never be ReWire on Apple Silicon, and I doubt libraries will be created for Windows ARM. So, enjoy it while you can. The original spec was by Propellerheads in collaboration with Steinberg. I wish Reason Studios would release the code into the public domain and make it open source. Then, maybe some enterprising coder could keep ReWire alive.
  3. I don't know how to code, but it seems it would be quite a task to redo the UI to make it scalable. It's something Cakewalk had to do to remain relevant in the increasingly prevalent world of hi-res monitors. Remember all those posts back in the day of "we don't want new features, just fix the darn bugs!"
  4. If you can handle pitch shifts, speeding up/slowing down preserves fidelity the best. When stretching, what happens to the transients depends on how the stretching algorithm is implemented. The same stretching algorithm can exhibit subtly different characteristics in different programs. For example, a program might prioritize preserving attacks as much as possible, and apply stretching after the attack. FWIW, where you place the markers to change tempo also affects the fidelity of stretching-based tempo changes.
  5. Regarding room tuning and such, remember that the level at which you listen to music matters because the frequency response of your ear varies depending on the level. K-System calibration is still useful for calibrating monitor levels.
  6. Don't overlook the ability to render at the existing tempo, then bring the file into Sonar to create tempo changes that help the song "breathe." I did an analysis of several songs' tempo in Sonar, the results are pretty revealing. Please circle back if you need more info on this.
  7. FWIW if you're talking Dolby Atmos, it can render to binaural audio that works well on headphones and earbuds. Of course, it doesn't have the impact a full-blown surround system with a bunch of speakers. However, with so many people listening on headphones, Atmos mixes are a step up. There's a sense of fullness and space you don't get with stereo. Lately I'm posting both Atmos (headphones only) and Stereo (speakers or headphones) mixes on my YouTube channel, like how labels put out mono and stereo versions of the same record during the transition from mono to stereo. The Atmos version gets more clicks.
  8. What people seem most upset isn't about the Artst/Pro/+ split, but that Professional users can no longer buy the addons they bought in the past. The only way to get the addons is through a subscription.
  9. It depends on the company. But there are also niche reasons for subscriptions, like collaborating on a project where you don't share the same software. You can subscribe for just long enough to complete the project. For example, you can buy a perpetual license for Pro Tools Artist. Then you work on a project with someone who uses Pro Tools Studio, and uses features you don't have. You subscribe to Studio for a month or two, and then drop the subscription when the project is done. I believe companies that offer perpetual and subscription options will always have the best model. A big advantage of that model is you can subscribe for a year, but if you find you really love a program, then you can buy a perpetual version. The sense I get from people is that they'll refuse to buy a subscription if it's the only option available. Hey, I'm still using GIMP instead of Photoshop . Paradoxically, I think more people would buy subscriptions if perpetual licenses were also available, because then they'd have a safety ned.
  10. FWIW, when subscriptions first started appearing I did an analysis of outright purchase + paying for updates compared to subscription costs. After several years, it turned out to be more or less the same because updates were less expensive than an initial purchase. The main advantage of a subscription was you had new features immediately instead of having them rolled into an update for which you had to pay. So, a lot of the decision-making process involves how often a company updates their software, and whether you need those updates. Cakewalk has a very good track record in that respect compared to, for example, Pro Tools.
  11. FWIW, Cakewalk is one of the few programs whose MPE implementation handles MIDI guitars with MPE mode (Zivix Jamstik), not just Mono and Poly modes. This is essential for using MIDI guitar with multitimbral instruments. I know, I know...I'm probably the only person here who cares about this. But it's an example of Cakewalk being on top of some things that are missing from other DAWs.
  12. Perhaps another possibility is that Bandlab has bigger fish to fry at the moment.
  13. Here's an example. I did a preset pack for the Line 6 Helix. Subsequently, Line 6 came out with an update that improved many of the cab sounds. I made the changes for my own use, then approached Line 6 about offering a free update to people who had bought the original pack. They had no problem with the idea, but the company they were using to fulfill orders simply had no way to modify a system designed to sell things to new customers to a system designed to give free updates to existing customers and a different version than it had offered originally to new customers. I ended up including the revised presets with my downloadable Helix book. I ran into the same issues with Sweetwater Publishing about offering periodic, free updates to my eBooks. To their credit, they modified their order processing to give users with previous versions free updates, but it wasn't a trivial undertaking. I believe they're still working on how they can modify the system to sell significant updates (e.g., like going from v1.0 to v2.0) at half-price to owners or previous editions. I figured it would be easy to do...wrong. Despite Sweetwater being a technologically hip company, it took them quite a bit of effort to bulletproof the system.
  14. Not just PreSonus - also Universal Audio, Avid, Waves, and Native Instruments, among others. It seems the industry is going in the Burger King direction - "have it your way." The beauty of software is that the Bakers can tweak the model easily over time. Also, I can vouch from personal experience that making backend changes to accommodate different purchasing models can be a nightmare. IMHO the Bakers are doing a fine job of nurturing Sonar and keeping it alive and growing. I don't think there's any question they deserve compensation not only for their current efforts, but for the work put into the program while it was free. It seems the only question is what form that compensation should take.
×
×
  • Create New...