Jump to content

MarianoGF

Members
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MarianoGF

  1. Something tells me that, despite we are all speculating about our beloved Sonar and its price, the real future of Cakewalk, the app intended to be one step ahead in the future DAW market, and the one that means the survival of Cakewalk for "next" 15 years, is Next. We should pay a bit more attention about what happens with Cakewalk Next::.

    • Like 5
  2. 55 minutes ago, Noel Borthwick said:

    bias permeates the entire music industry!  

    The n°1 bias Is ProTools. I was tired to hear the ProTools users telling me about its "new awesome features", ignoring Sonar had them since one year before. (For instance AudioSnap, just to mention one) Ignoring even that Sonar existed. Fortunately those days aré gone, now the DAW market is a bit more even (a bit).

    • Like 2
  3. I think Sonar should come from day 1 with many interesting extra features in comparison with CbB. Otherwise, who will spend some hundreds in a program that is exactly the same as CbB but with better GUI? That can lead the users to buy Sonar just when the difference with CbB is considerable (maybe one or two years after its release).

    How much time Sonar could stand being purchased by very few people, because it's almost the same as the free CbB?

    • Great Idea 1
  4. 19 minutes ago, Lord Tim said:

    I haven't seen anything to suggest they'll be taking any effects or instruments away at all.

    Furthermore, in the Sonar thumbnails of the website it appears again the LPhase-EQ. I don't know what to think about that, but have to suppose that it comes back again along with LPhase-Multiband (and hopefully Adaptive Limiter).

    • Like 1
  5. 28 minutes ago, Lord Tim said:

    Do you think they would be using the same graphics, names and even website for the last 5 years if they didn't have the rights? This would have ALL been part of the Intellectual Property.

    No, I'm sure they have the rights (please). But I think that acquiring the brands Cakewalk and Sonar are more than to acquire just the intellectual property (the code).

  6. 9 hours ago, Lord Tim said:

    No you don't if you only purchase their intellectual property, which Bandlab did. They didn't purchase the company at all, just the code to make the program. They also hired the programmers that Gibson fired. But this is 100% a new unrelated company otherwise.

    I understand your point, that's what they said in early 2018. But if you acquire only de code, I don't think you can use the names "Cakewalk" or "Sonar", because that's not part of the intellectual properties. They are brands. But ofcourse I'm not sure, are all doubts I have.

  7. 4 hours ago, gustabo said:

    They didn't acquire the company, they acquired the intellectual property.

    As far as I know, if you acquire the intellectual property (as BandLab said in early 2018), you have the right to use the source code (the app), but not the brand "Cakewalk" neither "Sonar". So I guess that BandLab acquired more than just the intellectual property. But ofcourse I'm not sure at all.

    • Great Idea 1
    • Haha 1
  8. 45 minutes ago, Bruno de Souza Lino said:

    Next - Subscription based with all the stuff from SPlat. Or priced with the good old marketing strategy of diverting your attention away from that so you think you're actually saving money with the subscription.

    I don't think so. I guess Next is a simple app to make music, with easy to use synths, libraries and good sound quality. So similar to BandLab app, that I still can't understand the meaning of its (upcoming) existance.

    • Like 1
  9. Dear staff,
    First of all, thanks for such an awesome work. Cakewalk was never better than today.

    Just let me make an observation into the Export Menu:
    Since  the "Arranger Sections" export parameter is located into WHAT TO EXPORT list, It is implied that only sections of the entire mix can be exported. Nowadays it's not possible in Cakewalk to export sections of separated tracks or busses at once.
    What if the "Arranger Sections" export parameter is relocated to the RANGE list? Simply because sections are a time range concept. That way we can export some sections of separated tracks or busses, and not only of the entire mix.

    Please, tell me if my observation is correct or not.
    Thanks!

    vjITmZS.jpeg        1fa0Hp7.jpeg

  10. 2 minutes ago, John Ritter said:

    the link up top goes to download v2021.04D.  Is that the right link for 2021.09, just not renamed?

    Dear @John Ritter, thanks for using the theme.
    The version is still 2021.04d because the CbB 2021.06 and 202109 updates didn't involve theme changes, so I didn't have to modify it. The only thing I did is to clear that 2021.04d is absolutely compatible with CbB  2021.09.

  11. Hello.
    Sorry, I don't understand why the web installer/updater should be a replacement of BL Assistant. Couldn't them work together? If not, BL Assistant should stop informing Cakewalk updates, cause is very confusing (mostly for new users) to click the green button and see that stucks forever into "Downloading... (0/0)" state.
    Since I like BA, I personally would prefer both updating ways working together, so one can choose.

    Just my point of view.
    Thanks.

  12. 2 hours ago, Starship Krupa said:

    I like doing "theme" themes, and I like this BandLab-themed one.

    Any chance of putting your orange/white art changes into a Mercury-based light theme? Singapore Flowers? 😄

    I found with Nickel Mint/Racing Green and Blue Ice/Midnight Blue that I was able to reuse a lot of button and other art between them.

    @Starship Krupa good idea. Unfortunately I don't think I have these days the time to start and finish a new theme. But I'll consider it for the near future.

    Thanks!

×
×
  • Create New...