Jump to content

e-cue

Members
  • Posts

    863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by e-cue

  1. I’m digging into them now with the demo off their site.

    My hope was that this would allow me to take a stereo track, and extract stems (‘layers’ is the term they use) and use them for immersive mix work.  While it’s impressive what it can pull out, I don’t think it’s good enough for that.  Since, I could likely use it to isolate a track and listen to that to reverse-audio engineer any legacy work that’s being re-released in Atmos or 360RA.  

    When you load a song it, it’s an offline process.  I did a 192k file last night, and it took 18 minutes to process (honestly, still faster than me using izotope most of the time).  If you are looking to grab an element for sampling purposes, I think it’s probably the best I’ve found.  Other than that, I’d roll up my sleeve and turn to RX.  

     

    Oh- and I’m still confused about which version I’m even using and what the difference is between each of them. These cats really need a comparison chart on their site. 

    • Thanks 1
  2. Welp, here’s my take.  

     

    $38?  Cop it.  

     

    Now, I own a ton of Moog hardware and software.  I still have at least a pair of each of their EQs (1/3&parametric).  My biggest gripe is that the “drive” knob on the plug in’s suck total crap.  It does NOTHING until you crank it past 7 o clock.  I contacted PSP about this and they said :

    It was decided that they shouldn’t distort too much. If you run more level into them, they will distort more. In the hardware, when you turn up the drive (which is technically input level), there is compensation that turns the output down by an equal amount. It’s actually a counter-wired dual pot that does this. This compensation is effective only up to a point and will distort if the input level is loud enough. This is why there is no change up to a point and then change afterward. With more input level this will happen earlier on the DRIVE pot.

     

    I feel they got this wrong IMO, and I do “get” how the hardware works.  I even held on to a faulty unit that’s drive was more aggressive.  Furthermore, I very, very often use the MID BAND on the parametric EQ to EQ low frequencies, and to my ears the mid and low band are exactly the same in the plug in.  My hardware could be different, but they’d have to be consistently off.  

     

    They do feel moogsque and at the price point, gripes aside, I suggest the purchase.  I do welcome a Softube or UAD version in the future.  But you won’t see those for $38 for a freakin’ bundle like this, so cop it.  

  3. https://avid.secure.force.com/pkb/articles/Knowledge/Pro-Tools-2023-3-Release-Notes#KnownIssues

    "Dolby Atmos: Tracks are not properly time-aligned by real time bounce to ADM or multi-stem wav (PT-282856)"

     

    Ridiculous that this major bug hasn’t been fixed (and almost every engineer I talk to isn’t even aware of it).  

     

     

  4. 28 minutes ago, Benny Bear said:

    As far as i can tell, because I've just done it, it is free a free update for existing Blue Cat's PatchWork owners (from 2.6) and the offer is if you own any other Blue Cat products. The wording is a little misleading. I used my original email to download V2.65.

    Thanks.  

  5. 5 hours ago, Doug Steinschneider said:

    This works and it allows for more simplicity, but more tonal options would have been nice, since they don't provide you with a separate Leslie plugin.

     

    Am I stupid(er than normal) or... is there no way to pass external audio through the Leslie cab, bypassing the organ?  I can bypass the leslie cab, durr, but not the other way around.  

     

    I suppose it’s possible they omitted this feature, but that would seem extremely short sited.  

    booo!

×
×
  • Create New...