'Why I don't buy "Analog" EQ Plugins'

[T Boog]

I saw this a while back and thought it was very interesting. And considering it's such a beautiful day, I just thought I'd try to get an argument going between u guys 😁

 

 

[T Boog]

And comps...

 

Just curious if anyone here has any thoughts on these vids. Cheers 🍻

Edited 3 hours ago by T Boog

[Bapu]

He's a very intriguing guy.

[Bapu]

I bought his paid for compressor.  Have not taken it out for a spin.

[craigb]

1 hour ago, Bapu said:

I bought his paid for compressor.  Have not taken it out for a spin.

Shouldn't you leave it inside and compress with it instead of taking it out for a spin Ed? 🤔

 

😜

[OutrageProductions]

Opinions are like A##holes, everyone has one, thinks they're entitled to proclaim it to the masses, and most of them stink thanks to YT.

As an over-educated and practicing Electrical Engineer for over 40 years, I'll state these facts, which obviously only apply to the accurately emulated analog modeling algorithms, most of which one has to pay real money for:

Beyond the EQ curve or compression ratio are factors that are captured from the analog circuitry that are meant to emulate things like Intermodulation distortion, Total Harmonic distortion, slew rate, hysteresis, and transformer ringing, among other stuff that gives a distinct difference (to well trained ears) between, for example, a Dbx 160x and a genuine Teletronix LA2. They actually sound different if done correctly as a plug-in, as they do in the hardware version.

Does the "average" wannabe musician/recordist/content creator know the difference? No. Therefore, it matters to a very slim minority of modern engineers.